) Chief Engineer Bareilly Zone, Sarvatra Bhawan Station Road Bareilly Cantt v. M/s Marshall Corporation Ltd. 2 Chowrandge Approach Calcutta
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
The Civil Revision is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Arbitration Act s. 30 and 33
Key paragraphs
- Para 9797. The Civil Revision is dismissed. No order as to costs. (RAJESH TANDON J.) 18-9-2004 M.K.
Judgment
Heard Sh. Nand Prasad learned counsel for the revisionist and Sh. Arvind Vashisth learned counsel for the respondent. By the impugned order, he has challenged the order dt. 26-5- 1998 by which interest has not been awarded at the time of disposal of the application No. 30 or 33 of the Arbitration Act. By the present application the interest has been allowed. Aggrieved against the order, present revision has been field. I find no infirmity in the order. The objections Under Section 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act has already been rejected on 12-5-
Operative part
The Civil Revision is dismissed. No order as to costs. (RAJESH TANDON J.) 18-9-2004 M.K.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The Civil Revision is dismissed
Which court decided this case, and when?
Uttarakhand High Court, on 18 Sep 2004. The bench was RAJESH TANDON.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.