✦ High Court of India · 13 Oct 2025

9096 I N TH E H I GH COURT OF UTTA RA K H v. Counsel for t he

Case Details High Court of India · 13 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
13 Oct 2025
Length
1,026 words

Mr. Vikas Kum ar Guglani, Advocat e. Mr. Akshay Lat wal, Assist ant Governm ent Advocat e. Mr. Rishabh Bisht , Advocat e. The present Applicat ion has been filed under Sect ion 528 of t he Bharat iya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhit a, 2023 for quashing t he ent ire proceedings of Sessions Trial No.78 of 2024, “ St at e of Ut t arakhand Vs. Raj kum ar Kakkar alias Raj u and Ot hers” , pending before t he court of I I I rd Addit ional Sessions Judge, Rudrapur, Dist rict Udham Singh Nagar. 2 . According t o t he First I nform at ion Report , t he applicant s along wit h ot her co- accused persons beat t he respondent no.3, t he brot her of t he respondent 1 no.2- inform ant and t he respondent no.4, t he fat her of t he inform ant . A fire was also opened at t he inform ant . But t he said fire did not hit him . 3 . The cognizance has been t aken t he offence of Sect ions 147, 148, 149, 307, 452, 323, 504, 506, 120B, 269, 270 read wit h Sect ion 34 of t he I ndian Penal Code, 1860 against t he applicant s- accused Chand Babu alias Chand Khan, t he applicant no.2, Sat yendra Kum ar, t he applicant no.3, Nirwail Singh alias Bunt y, t he respondent no.5 and Sanj eet Singh alias Sunny, t he applicant no.6. The cognizance has been t aken for t he offence of Sect ions 147, 148, 149, 307, 452, 323, 504, 506, 120B, 269, 270 read wit h Sect ion 34 of t he I ndian Penal Code, 1860 and Sect ion 3 read wit h Sect ion 25 of t he Arm s Act , 1959 against Monu Khan, t he applicant no.1 and I kbal Khan alias Jahid, t he applicant no.4. 4 . Heard Mr. Vikas Kum ar Guglani, learned counsel for t he applicant s, Mr. Akshay Lat wal, learned Assist ant Governm ent Advocat e t he respondent no.1 and Mr. Rishabh Bisht , learned counsel for t he respondent no.2- inform ant , 3 and 4- inj ured. 5 . All t he Applicant s- accused are present t hrough video conferencing. They are ident ified by Mr. 2 Vikas Kum ar Guglani, Advocat e. The respondent no.2- inform ant , respondent no.3 and t he respondent no.4, t he inj ured, are present t hrough video conferencing. They are ident ified by Mr. Rishabh Bisht , Advocat e. 6 . According t o t he privat e respondent s, t he respondent no.3 and t he respondent no.4 had received sim ple inj uries. They ( privat e respondent s) have com pounded t he said offences. They have set t led t heir t he disput es wit h t he applicant s. Now, t hey ( applicant s and t he privat e respondent s) are living peacefully and in harm ony. They have filed a Com pounding Applicat ion ( I A No.01 of 2025) and affidavit s wit h t heir free will and wit hout any pressure. The privat e respondent s have request ed t o quash t he ent ire proceedings of t he said Sessions Trial No.78 of

2024. 7 . The said request has been opposed by t he respondent no.1 on t he ground t hat t he said offences are non- com poundable. 8 . The applicant s and t he privat e respondent s have set t led t heir all t he disput es and now, t hey are living peacefully and in harm ony. Considering t he t ot alit y of t he m at t er, t his Court is of t he view t hat ends of j ust ice would be m et if t he ent ire proceedings 3 of Sessions Trial No.78 of 2024, “ St at e of Ut t arakhand Vs. Raj kum ar Kakkar alias Raj u and Ot hers” , pending before t he court of I I I rd Addit ional Sessions Judge, Rudrapur, Dist rict Udham Singh Nagar, are quashed qua t he applicant s. 9 . Result ant ly, t he present Applicat ion, under Sect ion 528 of t he Bharat iya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhit a, 2023, is allowed and t he ent ire proceedings of Sessions Trial No.78 of 2024, “ St at e of Ut t arakhand Vs. Raj kum ar Kakkar alias Raj u and Ot hers” , pending before t he court of I I I rd Addit ional Sessions Judge, Rudrapur, Dist rict Udham Singh Nagar, are hereby quashed qua t he applicant s. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A LOK K UM A R VERM A , J. Dt : 13.10.2025 Neha NEHA BISHT DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=6f1c15b6305912b3f008e9a4a8038ee7326b08b 2d0e018b01be753f014836d27, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=3D89DC33779FB9677068452F32DE6BA9 60BFE64D819EE44CA9CCE487B2FE0F92, cn=NEHA BISHT 4

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments