Judgment · High Court · 2004
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Arbitration Act, 1940 s. 19
Judgment
from Allahabad High Court. None appears parties. By the present appeal the appellant has challenged the order 6-2-1999 by which the application under Section 19 of the Arbitration Act 1940 was rejected. It appears by lapse of time the 2nd appeal has become infructuous and is dismissed. However liberty is given to the parties to apply for recalling in case cause of action still survives. (Rajesh Tandon J.) 1-10-2004 M.K.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration Act, 1940 — s. 19.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Uttarakhand High Court, on 01 Oct 2004. The bench was RAJESH TANDON.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Uttarakhand High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AO No. 837 of 2001).
← Search more judgments