Ravindra v. Mr. K.S. Bora, Deput y Advocat e General, wit h
Case Details
find no infirm it y in t he im pugned j udgm ent t hat calls for int erference.
8. I t is set t led law t hat in an appeal against t he j udgm ent of acquit t al, ordinarily t he finding of acquit t al should not be upset unless it is found t hat t he sam e is t ot ally perverse and som e im port ant piece of evidence, which m ight have result ed in t he convict ion of t he accused, has not been considered by t he t rial court . I n t he present case, no such evidence has been point ed out .
9. Consequent ly, t o appeal refused. Leave pet it ion dism issed. Governm ent appeal also st ands dism issed accordingly. ( Su b h a sh Up a d h y a y , J.) ( M a n o j K u m a r Ti w a r i , J.) 1 6 .7 .2 0 2 5 Pr PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aeab1 98d462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052DF6 FCA58C67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR