✦ Uttarakhand High Court

UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Civil Transfer Application No.51 of 2025 Dr. Priyadarshni Mishra v. Dr. Priyadarshni (“the case”) from the court of Judge, Family Court, Nainital

Transfer Application No. 51 of 2025RAVINDRA MAITHANI

Case at a glance

Bench
RAVINDRA MAITHANI

Outcome

Allowed

Transfer application is allowed

Provisions considered

Judgment

Present : Ms. Reema Rana, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Anup Kumar Verma, Advocate for the respondent. JUDGMENT Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) By means of the instant transfer application, filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the applicant seeks transfer of Civil Suit/Case No.80 of 2025, Dr. V.K. Mishra Vs. Dr. Priyadarshni (“the case”) from the court of Judge, Family Court, Nainital to the court of Judge, Family Court, Haldwani.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is staying in Haldwani, whereas the respondent has filed a divorce suit in Nainital; the applicant has to take care of a child, who is physically handicapped, it is inconvenient to her to travel to Nainital to attend the proceedings.

4.

Learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the respondent is agreeable, if the case is transferred to Haldwani.

Operative part

5.

Transfer application is allowed. 2

6.

Civil Suit/Case No.80 of 2025, Dr. V.K. Mishra Vs. Dr. Priyadarshni is transferred from the court of Judge, Family Court, Nainital to the court of Judge, Family Court, Haldwani.

7.

Let a copy of this order be sent to both the courts. Sanjay (Ravindra Maithani, J.)

19.12.2025

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Transfer application is allowed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 24.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Uttarakhand High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Transfer Application No. 51 of 2025). ← Search more judgments