Pooj a Bhat t v. Ravindra Bhat t The brief fact s of t he case are t hat

SA N o . 6 6 o f 2 0 2 5 H o n ' b l e Ra k e sh Th a p l i y a l , J. 1. Mr. B.S. Adhikari, learned counsel for t he appellant . 2. Mr. Devesh Upret i, lear ned counsel for t he r espondent . 3. The inst ant second appeal has been preferr ed by t he plaint iff/ appellant Ravindra Bhat t against t he j udgm ent and order dat ed 27.03.2025 passed by t he learned Dist rict Judge Cham pawat in FA No. 10 of 2023 Pooj a Bhat t vs. Ravindra Bhat t . The brief fact s of t he case are t hat t he 4. present t he appellant m arried wit h respondent on 07.05.2019, however, due t o som e differences in bet w een bot h of t hem , t hey ar e due t o w hich living separat ely and t hen t he pr esent appellant filed a suit for divorce under Sect ion 13 1 ( 1A) of Hindu Marriage Act w hich was allow ed on 08.11.2023 decree was prepar ed on 20.11.2023. 5. Being aggrieved wit h t he j udgm ent and decr ee passed by t he t rial court in t he t he divorce suit defendant / wife Sm t . Pooj a Bhat t preferr ed first appeal bearing FA No. 10 of 2023, which was allowed on 27.03.2025 and t he j udgm ent and decree passed by t he t rial court was set aside. Now being aggrieved wit h t he j udgem ent passed by t he first appellat e court t he inst ant second appeal has been pr eferred. Though, t he second appeal has not yet 6. t he how ever, pendency, bot h t he part ies have resolved t heir disput es am icably by ent ering int o a writ t en com prom ise on 30.10.2025, and as per t he com prom ise t he pr esent appellant agree t o pay a lum p sum am ount of Rs. 21 lakh t o t he r espondent / wife t owar ds full and final set t lem ent of m aint enance by way of t he appellant , adm it t ed, filed by divorce during t hat t hat Judge 969261 t he Civil favour of proceedings for confirm at ion of dat ed no. dem and 29.10.2025, issued by St at e Bank of I ndia, Cham pawat Branch t he respondent - Pooj a. I n t he com prom ise, it is also agr eed t hat t he appellant shall ret ur n all goods belonging t o t he r espondent . 7. I n para- 4 of t he com prom ise it is also agreed t hat bot h t he part ies apply befor e t he High Court t he decree of divorce dat ed 20.11.2023 passed ( Senior Division) Cham pawat in Fam ily Case No. 157 of 2021 t he dissolut ion of m arr iage by m ut ual consent m ay at t ain finalit y. I n para- 5 it is also agr eed by t he 8. t hey wit hdraw all civil and part ies arising crim inal m at rim onial disput es and have undert aken not t o init iat e any fut ur e lit igat ion in respect t her eof. 9. The copy of com prom ise is also filed along wit h I A No. 01 of 2025 signed by bot h t he part ies as w ell as t he counsel for bot h t he part ies. 10. Since, now t he part ies have set t led t heir disput e w hich is r eflect ed fr om t he writ t en com prom ise dat ed 30.10.2025 and bot h t he part ies are also pr esent before t his Court and t his Court also int eract w it h each of t hem and t hey also subm it t hat t hey have set t led t heir all disput es and as such t he inst ant appeal be disposed of by set t ling aside t he order of t he first appellat e court by confir m ing j udgm ent and decree passed by t he t rial court wit h slight m odificat ion t hat t he divor ce is grant ed in bet w een bot h t he part ies in t erm s of of t he com prom ise ent er ed bet ween bot h of t hem on 30.10.2025. 11. Mr. B.S. Adhikari also handed over t he draft of Rs. 21,00,000/ - t owards per m anent respondent / wife dat ed alim ony 29.10.2025 phot ocopy of w hich is also placed on record. He also apprise t o t his Court t hat all belonging t o t he r espondent has already been handed over which has been adm it t ed by t he r espondent . t he t he t o I n t he inst ant second appeal subsequent 12. developm ent , t hat t he part ies have set t led int o t heir disput e by way of ent ering com prom ise disposed of in t er m s of t he com prom ise and t he j udgm ent and order passed by t he first appellat e court t he j udgm ent and decree passed by t he t rial court is m odified by t reat ing t he sam e t o be based upon com prom ise ent ered bet w een t he part ies and divorce grant ed by t he t rial court is t reat ed t o be divorce by way of m ut ual consent . is set aside and t he Nahid (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)

10.11.2025