✦ Uttarakhand High Court

Kundan Singh v. Under Sections

SECOND BAIL APPLICATION No. 777 of 2006PRAFULLA C PANT

Case at a glance

Outcome

Bail refused

The Second Bail Application is rejected with the observation

Judgment

Kundan Singh S/o Late Sri Pan Singh R/o Village Bhahati Gaon Tehsil Berinag, District Pithoragarh ……..Applicant State of Uttaranchal ………...Opposite Party Versus Arising out of Crime No. 01 of 2005 Under Sections: P.S.: Berinag District: Pithoragarh 304-B/498 A I.P.C. & ¾ Dowry Prohibition Act. Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J Heard Shri M.S. Pal, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Nandan Arya, learned A.G.A. for the State on this Second Bail Application. Applicant- Kundan Singh, who is in jail in connection with crime No. 01 of 2005, relating to offence punishable under Sections 304-B/498 A I.P.C. & ¾ Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, P.S. Berinag, District- Pithoragarh, has sought his release on bail. The earlier bail application was rejected by this Court on merits on

Operative part

25.01.2006. No new ground is made out at this stage. It is argued that applicant is in jail for almost one year. Since no new ground is made out in the Second Bail Application, the same is liable to be rejected. The Second Bail Application is rejected with the observation that the trial court is directed to proceed and decide the case, as expeditiously as possible. Dt. 02.11.2006 S (Prafulla C. Pant, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The Second Bail Application is rejected with the observation

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Uttarakhand High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. SECOND BAIL APPLICATION No. 777 of 2006). ← Search more judgments