Smt. Devli Devi v. State of Uttaranchal
Case at a glance
- Bench
- PRAFULLA C PANT
Outcome
Bail granted
Let the applicant be released on bail
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
Smt. Devli Devi W/o Shri Darban Lal @ Fukya Lal R/o Village Gwad P.S. Gopeshwar District Chamoli. ...........Applicant Versus State of Uttaranchal ...........Opposite Party ___________________________________________________ Arising out of Crime No. 115 of 2006 Under Sections: 498 A, 304 B I.P.C. and section ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act. P.S.: Gopeshwar District: Chamoli. ___________________________________________________ Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J Heard Shri R.P. Nautiyal, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. Applicant- Smt. Devli Devi, who connection with crime No. 115 of 2006 relating to offence under Sections 498 A, 304 B I.P.C. and section ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, P.S. Gopeshwar, District Chamoli, has sought her release on bail. From the perusal of the First Information Report, it appears that before the death of the deceased, she was taken by her in-laws to the hospital and it is not clear which of the three accused caused injuries on the person of the deceased. The applicant is a woman. In the above circumstances, considering that the applicant is woman, in the opinion of this Court, she deserves bail. Let the applicant be released on bail on executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopeshwar. Dt. 18.09.2006 S (Prafulla C. Pant, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Let the applicant be released on bail
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.