✦ High Court of India · 03 Jul 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 03 Jul 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
03 Jul 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,083 words

Mr. Vipul Painuli, learned A.G.A. for t he St at e of Ut t arakhand.

3. Mr. Ankit Rana, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Ankur Sharm a, learned counsel for t he Respondent Nos. 2 t o 4.

4. The present applicat ion under Sect ion 528 of t he Bharat iya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhit a, 2023, has been filed on behalf of t he Applicant s against Respondent No. 2 seeking quashing of t he charge sheet dat ed

31.10.2022, t he sum m oning order dat ed 10.10.2023 and t he ent ire proceedings of Crim inal Case No. 1308 of 2023, “ St at e of Mangeram and Ot hers,” for offence punishable under Sect ions 147, 149, 323, 504 and 506 of t he I ndian Penal Code, 1860, pending in t he Court of t he learned Addit ional Chief Judicial Magist rat e, Laksar, Dist rict Haridwar.

5. Along w it h t he present applicat ion under Sect ion 528, a j oint Com pounding Applicat ion ( I .A. No. 1 of 2025) has been filed and signed by t he part ies, duly support ed by t heir separat e affidavit s, wherein it is st at ed t hat t he part ies have ent ered int o a com prom ise and request t hat , in t his light , t he m at t er m ay be com pounded.

6. As per t he order sheet dat ed 30.04.2025, t he Coordinat e Bench direct ed t he part ies t o appear before t he Secret ary, Dist r ict Legal Services Aut horit y, Dist rict Haridwar on 05.05.2025, who, in t urn, would t ake t heir Aadhaar Cards for ident ificat ion and also verify and aut hent icat e t he cont ent s of t he com pounding applicat ion by recording t heir st at em ent s. Furt her direct ions were m ade for subm it t ing t he report of t he learned Secret ary, Dist rict Legal Services Aut horit y, Dist rict Haridwar before t he next dat e of list ing.

7. Today, Applicant Nos. 1 t o 6- Mangeram , Sonit Kum ar, Rahul Kum ar, Sm t . Daya Devi, Kum ari Kom al and Hari Singh appearing t hrough conferencing before t he Court and are duly ident ified by Mr. Vaibhav Singh Chauhan, Advocat e. Respondent Nos. 2 t o 4- Neeraj , Sm t . Pooj a and Sachin are also appearing t hrough video conferencing before t he Court and are duly ident ified by Mr. Ankit Rana, Advocat e.

8. Heard learned counsel for t he part ies and perused t he m at erial available on record.

9. I n light of t he legal principles laid down by t he Hon’ble Apex Court in Gi a n Si n g h v s. St a t e o f Pu n j a b , ( 2 0 1 2 ) 1 0 SCC 3 0 3 , and D i m p e y Gu j r a l v s. Un i o n Te r r i t o r y o f Ch a n d i g a r h , Tr a n sf e r Pe t i t i o n ( Cr i m i n a l ) N o . 1 1 5 o f 2 0 1 2 , d e ci d e d o n 0 6 .1 2 .2 0 1 2 , t his Court holds t hat crim inal proceedings m ay be quashed if t he m at t er has been am icably set t led bet ween t he part ies and t hey are inclined t o rest ore peace and harm ony.

10. Per cont ra, t he learned St at e Counsel raised a prelim inary obj ect ion, cont ending t hat som e of t he offences are non- com poundable.

11. Considering t he overall fact s and circum st ances of t he case, t his Court is of t he v iew t hat t he ends of j ust ice would be m et by quashing t he ent ire proceedings of Crim inal Case No. 1308 of 2023, “ St at e of Mangeram and Ot hers,” for offence punishable under Sect ions 147, 149, 323, 504 and 506 of t he I ndian Penal Code, 1860, pending in t he Court of t he learned Addit ional Chief Judicial Magist rat e, Laksar, Dist rict Haridwar.

12. Accordingly, t he Com pounding Applicat ion allowed. The ent ire proceedings of Crim inal Case No. 1308 of 2023, “ St at e of Mangeram and Ot hers,” for offence punishable under Sect ions 147, 149, 323, 504 and 506 of t he I ndian Penal Code, 1860, pending in t he Court of t he learned Addit ional Chief Judicial Magist rat e, Laksar, Dist rict Haridwar, are hereby quashed.

13. The Crim inal Miscellaneous Applicat ion filed under Sect ion 528 of t he Bharat iya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhit a, 2023, is accordingly disposed of. ( A sh i sh N a i t h a n i , J.) 0 3 .0 7 .2 0 2 5 Shiksha SHIKSHA BINJOLA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3410ef86ae41ec9fbabcd5dba6b3a2c24b5aa08b09c12f21822fbd4 0bf639b1c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=FD80A2D028949381C52796A542D7FF0A9BED00E67B5283 D205F18FE29BDF5DD9, cn=SHIKSHA BINJOLA

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments