✦ Uttarakhand High Court · 22 Jun 2006

RT CH Cr . . . Pr ad eep Ku m ar v. Pr ad eep Ku m ar & ot h er der sect

C S WAT7 min read

Case at a glance

Decided
22 Jun 2006
Bench
C S WAT

Judgment

1.

Hear d lear n ed cou n sel f or t h e p ar t ies an d p er u sed t h e r ecor d.

2.

Th is is a pet it ion u n der sect ion 4 8 2 Cr . P. C. t o q u ash an d set aside t h e im p u g n ed or der s dat ed 2 1 . 2 . 2 0 0 5 an d 3 . 2 . 2 0 0 6 p assed b y t h e Op p osit e Par t y No. 1 in case No. 3 of 2 0 0 3 Har i Moh an Kap oor Vs Pr ad eep Ku m ar & ot h er s u n der sect ion 1 4 5 cr . P. C. , Police st at ion gan g Nah er Roor k ee, d ist r ict Har id w ar 3 . Br ief f act s f or t h e d isp osal of t h is pet it ion ar e t h at a p r oceed in g s u n der sect ion 1 4 5 Cr . P. C. w it h r eg ar d t o t h e cer t ain im m ov ab le p r oper t y w er e in it iat ed b y t h e Su b D iv ision al Mag ist r at e. Af t er r ecor d in g t h e ev iden ce t h e lear n ed Mag ist r at e p assed t h e im p u gn ed or der on 2 1 . 2 . 2 0 0 5 an d ap p oin t ed a r eceiv er Man oh ar Lal Sh ar m a, Ad v ocat e an d d ir ect ed t o r em ov e t h e illeg al p ossession on t h e sp ot an d h an d ov er t h e p ossession t o t h e r eciv er Sr i Man oh ar Lal Sh ar m a. I t w as f u r t h er d ir ect ed t h at t h e im p u g n ed or d er w ill b e ef f ect ed on ly af t er t h e d isp osal of t h e w r it p et it ion p en d in g in t h e Hig h Cou r t an d h an d ov er t h e p ossession t o t h at p er son in case t h er e is an y or der p assed b y t h e Hig h Cou r t .

4.

Th er eaf t er an ap p licat ion w as m ov ed t h at som e ot h er per son m ay b e ap p oin t ed as r eceiv er an d v id e or der d at ed 3 . 2 . 2 0 0 5 Ex ecu t iv e Of f icer of Nag ar Palik a, Roor k ee w as ap p oin t ed as Su p u r d gar in p lace of Sr i Man h oh ar Lal Sh ar m a. Th e or der passed b y t h e lear n ed Su b D iv ision al Mag ist r at e is r ev isab le u n d er t h e p r ov ision s of Code of Cr im in al Pr oced u r e. I f ot h er ef f icaciou s r em ed y h as been p r ov id ed u n der t h e Cod e of Cr im in al Pr oced u r e t o seek t h e r em ed y in v olv in g in h er en t p ow er s u n der sect ion 4 8 2 Cr . P. C. is n ot av ailab le t o t h e par t ies. I n t h is case t h e ot h er ef f icaciou s r em ed y of r ev ision w as av ailab le t o t h e ap p lican t an d , as su ch , t h e pet it ion is d ev oid of m er it an d is liab le t o b e d ism issed .

5.

Th e pet it ion is d ism issed. Th e in t er im or der , if an y , is v acat ed.

6.

All t h e pen d in g m iscellan eou s ap p licat ion ( s) in t h is case, if an y , sh all st an d d isp osed of accor d in g ly . 22nd Ju n e, 2 0 0 6 Sh iv ( J . C. S. Ra w a t , J. )

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Uttarakhand High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments