RT CH Cr . . . Pr ad eep Ku m ar v. Pr ad eep Ku m ar & ot h er der sect
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 22 Jun 2006
- Bench
- C S WAT
Judgment
Hear d lear n ed cou n sel f or t h e p ar t ies an d p er u sed t h e r ecor d.
Th is is a pet it ion u n der sect ion 4 8 2 Cr . P. C. t o q u ash an d set aside t h e im p u g n ed or der s dat ed 2 1 . 2 . 2 0 0 5 an d 3 . 2 . 2 0 0 6 p assed b y t h e Op p osit e Par t y No. 1 in case No. 3 of 2 0 0 3 Har i Moh an Kap oor Vs Pr ad eep Ku m ar & ot h er s u n der sect ion 1 4 5 cr . P. C. , Police st at ion gan g Nah er Roor k ee, d ist r ict Har id w ar 3 . Br ief f act s f or t h e d isp osal of t h is pet it ion ar e t h at a p r oceed in g s u n der sect ion 1 4 5 Cr . P. C. w it h r eg ar d t o t h e cer t ain im m ov ab le p r oper t y w er e in it iat ed b y t h e Su b D iv ision al Mag ist r at e. Af t er r ecor d in g t h e ev iden ce t h e lear n ed Mag ist r at e p assed t h e im p u gn ed or der on 2 1 . 2 . 2 0 0 5 an d ap p oin t ed a r eceiv er Man oh ar Lal Sh ar m a, Ad v ocat e an d d ir ect ed t o r em ov e t h e illeg al p ossession on t h e sp ot an d h an d ov er t h e p ossession t o t h e r eciv er Sr i Man oh ar Lal Sh ar m a. I t w as f u r t h er d ir ect ed t h at t h e im p u g n ed or d er w ill b e ef f ect ed on ly af t er t h e d isp osal of t h e w r it p et it ion p en d in g in t h e Hig h Cou r t an d h an d ov er t h e p ossession t o t h at p er son in case t h er e is an y or der p assed b y t h e Hig h Cou r t .
Th er eaf t er an ap p licat ion w as m ov ed t h at som e ot h er per son m ay b e ap p oin t ed as r eceiv er an d v id e or der d at ed 3 . 2 . 2 0 0 5 Ex ecu t iv e Of f icer of Nag ar Palik a, Roor k ee w as ap p oin t ed as Su p u r d gar in p lace of Sr i Man h oh ar Lal Sh ar m a. Th e or der passed b y t h e lear n ed Su b D iv ision al Mag ist r at e is r ev isab le u n d er t h e p r ov ision s of Code of Cr im in al Pr oced u r e. I f ot h er ef f icaciou s r em ed y h as been p r ov id ed u n der t h e Cod e of Cr im in al Pr oced u r e t o seek t h e r em ed y in v olv in g in h er en t p ow er s u n der sect ion 4 8 2 Cr . P. C. is n ot av ailab le t o t h e par t ies. I n t h is case t h e ot h er ef f icaciou s r em ed y of r ev ision w as av ailab le t o t h e ap p lican t an d , as su ch , t h e pet it ion is d ev oid of m er it an d is liab le t o b e d ism issed .
Th e pet it ion is d ism issed. Th e in t er im or der , if an y , is v acat ed.
All t h e pen d in g m iscellan eou s ap p licat ion ( s) in t h is case, if an y , sh all st an d d isp osed of accor d in g ly . 22nd Ju n e, 2 0 0 6 Sh iv ( J . C. S. Ra w a t , J. )
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.