✦ Uttarakhand High Court

Pankaj Sharma v. State of Uttaranchal

No. 127 of 2005B C KANDPAL

Case at a glance

Judgment

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arising out of Case Crime No. 472 of 2004 Under Section 307 I.P.C. P.S. Jwalapur District Haridwar Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. By the court The applicant has applied for bail in case crime No. 472 of 2004 under Section 307 I.P.C. registered at P.S. Jwalapur, District Haridwar. Heard Sri Navneet Kaushik learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record. The applicant alleged to have caused the injuries on his mother, Kunti Devi. The record shows that mother of the applicant Kunti Devi sustained the injuries during the course of the occurrence. Subsequently, she filed a criminal complaint before the court of competent jurisdiction stating therein that she was in fact assaulted by Paras Chauhan, Ashu Chauhan and Sushil Chauhan and in that complaint case, the statement under Section 200 Cr.P.C. has been recorded. Keeping in view the complaint field by the injured, Kunti Devi and her statement under Section 200 Cr.P.C., I find it is a fit case for bail at this stage. Let the applicant Pankaj Sharma be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M. concerned.

19.02.2005 ASWAL (B.C. Kandpal, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Uttarakhand High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. No. 127 of 2005). ← Search more judgments