WRIT PETITION NO. 1983 (S/S) OF 2005 v. State of Uttaranchal

Sri N.S. Pundir, learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Sri N.S. Pudnir and Sri Ashish Rawat, Learned Counsels the petitioners and Learned Standing Counsel respondents. By the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the candidature of the Petitioners as Siksha Mitra or give preference under Siksha Mitra Scheme in Primary School of Naugaon Block. Briefly stated, Petitioners No. 1 &2 were initially appointed an Anudeshak by the respondent No.3 in the year 1992 under the scheme issued by the then U.P. Government in the year 1997 & petitioner No. 3 was also appointed an Anudeshak by respondent No. 3 under the above said scheme. They continued till 09.03.2000 as Anudehsak at Block-Naugaon District Uttarkashi. Petitioners have further submitted that in the year 1975, the then U.P. Government created a new Scheme “Anopcharick Siksha” according to which instructor Anopcharick will be given appointment for every Gram Shabha for giving basic education to the students of rural area who cannot go to school for receiving the primary education. After the creation of State of Uttaranchal, the Anopcharick Siksha Scheme has been abolished by the State of Uttaranchal and created a new scheme namely Sarva Siksha Abhiyan and the service of Anudeshak in all over State were terminated and they were assured that in newly created scheme they will be adjusted but till date inspite of such assurance the respondents have not adjusted the present petitioners. In the year 2001, the State of Uttaranchal issued a Scheme of Siksha Mitra, this was amended in year 2004 & 2005. According to this scheme such candidates who posses graduate degree and are the domicile of Uttaranchal and are residing in that Gram Shabha of Gram Panchayat or block will be considered for appointment as Siksha Mitra and State of Uttaranchal has appointed hundreds of Siksha Mitra but the services of Anudeshak who were removed on the basis of abolition of old scheme and creating of new scheme have not been regularized. Moreover, no preference has been given to the Anudeshak who were removed due to the creation of new Scheme known as Siksha Mitra. In this regard, Petitioners have approached the concerned authorities but all in vain. The petitioners are residing in Naugaon block and have domicile also and further several seats are lying vacant in many Primary Schools. The petitioners have preferred the writ petition No. 1740 (S/S) of 2005 (Smt. Chandra Kala Vs. State of Uttaranchal and others) which has been finally disposed of by this Hon’ble Court on

25.11.2005 on the same terms and conditions of the order by this Court on 14.09.2005 in Writ Petition No.1678(S/S) 2003 [Km. Seema Chamola and others Vs. Stateof Uttaranchal and others) passed by this Hon’ble Court, it has been held as under:- ^^izR;qRrj izfr 'kiFki= esa ;kphx.k us dFku fd;k gS fd ;kph la01 Lukrd ijh{kk mRrh.kZ gS vkSj mldh fu;qfDr 1-10-1989 dks vuqnsf’kdk ds in dh x;h Fkh A ifj’knh; izkFkfed fo|ky;ksa esa f’k{kd ds in ij fu;qfDr dh vgZrk b.VjehfM,V mRrh.kZ j[kh x;h Fkh A ;kph la[;k 2 dh fu;qfDr 01-09-1988 dks dh x;h Fkh vkSj o"kZ 1989 esa dk;Z NksM+us ds mijkar fnukad 16-08-1996 ds iqufuZ;qfDr vkns’k ls og fujarj dk;Zjr gS A ;kph la[;k 2 ijkLukrd gS vkSj og ifj"knh; izkFkfed fo|ky; esa f’k{kd ds in ij fu;qfDr ikus dk vf/kdkjh gS A ;kph la[;k 3 Lukrd ijh{kk mRrh.kZ gS mls ekg twu 1996 esa iqufuZ;qfDr nh xbZ] ijUrq mlus ;g dgdj dk;Z djus ls jksdk x;k fd og fookfgrk gks x;h gS A blh izdkj ;kph la[;k &4 Lukrd ijh{kk mRrh.kZ gS vkSj og Hkh o"kZ 1991 ls ifj’knh; izkFkfed fo|ky; esa f’k{kd ds in ij fu;qfDr ikus dk vf/kdkjh gSA ;kph la[;k &4 dh tUefrfFk 20-09-1968 gS vkSj o"kZ 1991 esa og 23 o"kZ dk gks pqdk gSA ;kfpdk esa mldh vk;q 20 o"kZ vuqekur% vafdr dh x;h gS A ;kph x.k fu;r O;oLFkkvksa ds vuq:Ik ch0Vh0lh0] ftyk 'kSf{kd ,oa izf’k{k.k laLFkku ds vraxZr izf’k{k.k ys jgs gSa A ;g Hkh dFku j[kk x;k gS fd ;kphx.k ls mudh fu;qfDr ds mijkar fujarj dk;Z fy;k tk jgk Fkk A ;kphx.k ds dk;Z dh izd`fRr va’kdkfyd ugha gS A ;kphx.k us ifj’knh; izkFkfed fo|ky;ksa esa f’k{kd in ij fu;qfDr ikus gsrq vko’;d izf’k{k.k izkIr dj fy;k gS vkSj vuqns’kd dk dk;Z ifj’knh; izkFkfed f’k{kdksa ds vuq:Ik gS] ijUrq blds ckotwn ;kph x.k dks izkFkfed f’k{kdksa ds inksa ij lek;ksftr ugha fd;k tk jgk gS A lkFk gh ;g Hkh rdZ fn;k x;k fd 'kklukns’k fnukad 22-11-1995] ftls ;kfpdk ds lkFk layXud&14ds :i esa layXu fd;k x;k gS] ds vuqlkj mRrjkWpy ds ifj’knh; izkFkfed fo|ky;ksa esa izf’kf{kr vH;kfFkZ;ksa ds miyC/k u gksus ij fu/kkZfjr ;ksX;rk okys vizf’kf{kr vH;fFkZ;ksa dks fu;r osrueku ij f’k{kd ds in ij j[ks tkus dk izkfo/kku fd;k x;k gS vkSj bl izdkj ls fu;qDr f’k{kdksa dks 5 o’kksZa ds varxZr fu/kkZfjr izf’k{k.k iw.kZ djuk gksxk vr% bl 'kklukns’k ds vk/kkj ij Hkh ;kphx.k izkFkfed fo|ky;ksa esa lgk;d v/;kid ds in ij fu;qfDr ikus ds iw.kZ vf/kdkjh gSa A ;kphx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ fn;k gS fd ;kfpdkdrkZvksa us foxr 10 o"kksZa ls Hkh vf/kd le; rd vuqns’kd@vuqnsf’kdk ds in ij dk;Z fd;k gS vkSj os 'kS{kf.kd l= 2001 rd dk;Z dj pqds gSa A o"kZ 2001 esa mRrjkWpy 'kklu }kjk vukSipkfjd f’k{kk ds LFkku ij loZf’k{kk vfHk;ku ds varxZr 6 ls 14 o"kZ ds cPpksa dks f’kf{kr djus gsrq vizf’kf{kr f’k{kk fe=ksa dh lsok,sa yh gSa ijUrq 'kklu us iwoZ ls gh dk;Zjr vuqns’kdksa dks oafpr fd;k gS] ftUgSa fd foxr 10 o"kkZs ls Hkh vf/kd f’k{k.k dk;Z dk vuqHko gSa A mDr ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa ;g U;k;ksfpr ,oa lehphu gksxk fd ;kphx.k viuh foxr lsok lEcU/kh ifjfLFkr;ksa dks bafxr djrs gq, funs’kd] csfld f’k{kk mRrjkWpy ’kklu] nsgjknwu dks viuk la;qDr izR;kosnu ¼bl fu.kZ; dh lR;kfir izfrfyfi lfgr½ vkt dh frfFk ls 15 fnu ds varxZr izLrqr djsaxs vkSj funs’kd ls ;g vis{kk dh tkrh gS fd mDr izR;kosnu izkIr gksus ds ,d ekg ds Hkhrj] bl rF; dks n`f’Vxr j[krs gq, fd ;kphx.k tks fd iwoZ ls gh izf’kf{kr gSa vkSj ftUgksaus yEch vof/k rd vuqns’kdks ds in ij dk;Z fd;k gS] ;kphx.k ds izR;kosnu i= ij lgkuqHkwfriwoZd fopkj djrs gq, izR;kosnu dk fuLrkj.k djsaxs vkSj ’kklu }kjk vukSipkfjd f’k{kk ds LFkku ij loZf’k{kk vfHk;ku ds varxZr 6 ls 14 o"kZ ds cPpksa dks f’kf{kr djus gsrq vizf’kf{kr f’k{kk fe+=ks dh lsok,sa ysus dh tks ;kstuk dk;kZfUor dh x;h gS mlh ;kstuk ds vk/khu ;kphx.k ds vH;FkZu ij fopkj djsaxs vkSj fy, x;s fu.kZ; ls ;kphx.k dks lwfpr djsaxs A ;kfpdk mDr funsZ’k ds lkFk vafre :i ls fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gS A mHk;i{k viuk&viuk O;; Lo;a ogu djsaxs A** In the above facts and decisions, the respondents are directed to dispose of the representation of the Petitioners within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order in accordance with law. Consequently, writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

09.03.2006 Jain (Rajesh Tandon, J.)