Shakambari Devi v. State of Uttarakhand
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
Bail application is allowed accordingly
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
……..Opposite party _________________________________________________________ Arising out of Case Crime No. 89/2010, U/Ss 304-B IPC PS Dhumakot, District Pauri Garhwal _________________________________________________________ JUNE 15, 2010 HON’BLE DHARAM VEER,J. Heard Mr. DCS Rawat, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is mother-in-law and is an old lady ailing with serious disease. He further argued that no specific allegation has been made against her. He also submitted that co-accused Vinod Singh Rawat @ Vinu has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 17.5.2010 and the present applicant is also entitled for bail on the basis of parity. Having heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the parties; perusal of the contents of FIR; in view of the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting upon the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. Let the applicant Shakambari Devi be released on bail on her executing a personal bond and furnishing of two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. Bail application is allowed accordingly. (Dharam Veer,J.)
15.6.2010 PRABODH
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Bail application is allowed accordingly
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.