✦ High Court of India · 02 Sep 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 02 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
02 Sep 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,038 words

learned Senior 1. Mr. T.A. Khan, Counsel assist ed by Mohd. Shafy, learned counsel for t he pet it ioner.

2. Mr. Raj eev Singh Bisht , Addit ional C.S.C. Ut t arakhand. learned t he St at e of

3. Pet it ioner was appoint ed as Pat wari ( Revenue Sub- I nspect or) in Dist rict Tehri Garhwal vide order dat ed 03.02.2001. He was subsequent ly t ransferred from t o Dist rict Dist rict Dehradun by Divisional Com m issioner, Garhwal Division, vide order dat ed 23.01.2008. Tehri Garhwal The next prom ot ional post t o 4. is Revenue Revenue Sub- I nspect or I nspect or and before prom ot ion, one has t o undergo requisit e t raining. I n Dist rict Dehradun, a select list was prepared of candidat es, who were nom inat ed undergoing t raining. Since pet it ioner ’s nam e was not included in t hat list , and according t o him , persons, who were appoint ed as Revenue Sub- I nspect or aft er him are also nom inat ed for t raining, t herefore, pet it ioner has approached t his Court seeking t he following reliefs: - ( i) To issue a writ order cert iorari quashing t he list dat ed 28.03.2025 ( Annexure no. 1 t o t his pet it ion) , issued by t he respondent no. 2 for t he purpose of t raining of Revenue I nspect or of 18 t h Bat ch. ( ii) To issue a writ order or direct ion in t he t he of m andam us direct ing nat ure respondent s t o include t he nam e of t he pet it ioner in list of eligible candidat es issued on 28.03.2025 and provide his t he t raining of Revenue I nspect or 18 t h bat ch like ot her candidat es and place his nam e in t he list of in accordance of his dat e of candidat es subst ant ive appoint m ent i.e. 03.02.2001 and t he respondent s be furt her direct ed t o t he post of prom ot e Revenue I nspect or in accordance wit h his dat e of his subst ant ive appoint m ent i.e. 03.02.2001. t he pet it ioner t o

5. I t is not in disput e t hat select ion for t raining is t o be m ade on t he crit eria of seniorit y subj ect t o rej ect ion of unfit .

6. A count er affidavit has been filed by Dist rict Magist rat e, Dehradun in which it is m ent ioned t hat pet it ioner sought t ransfer from Dist rict Tehri Garhwal t o Dist rict Dehradun, which was accept ed by Divisional Com m issioner, and in t he order, passed by Addit ional Dist rict Magist rat e ( Adm inist rat ion) , Deharadun on 10.03.2008, specifically m ent ioned t hat since pet it ioner ’s t ransfer t o Dehradun is on his request , t herefore, he would be placed at t he bot t om of t he seniorit y list in Dist rict Dehradun. The order passed by Addit ional Dist rict Magist rat e is enclosed as Annexure – CA2 t o t he count er affidavit . it was t his Court Learned St at e Counsel has drawn list of t he

7. at t ent ion of candidat es, who are nom inat ed Revenue enclosed as Annexure – CA3 count er affidavit . I nspect or Training, which t he t o t o

8. Perusal of t he said list indicat es t hat Revenue I nspect ors, appoint ed in Dist rict Dehradun upt o May 2007, alone have been nom inat ed for t raining. By virt ue of order dat ed 10.03.2008, passed by Magist rat e Dist rict Addit ional ( Adm inist rat ion) , Dehradun, pet it ioner cannot have any grievance against nom inat ion appoint ed in Dist rict Dehradun upt o May, 2007. persons, who

9. The subm ission m ade by learned Senior Counsel for t he pet it ioner t hat pet it ioner was appoint ed as Revenue Sub- I nspect or in 2001 and he was t ransferred, not on request but in public int erest t o Dehradun, get s belied by t he docum ent cont ained as Annexure – CA2 t o t he count er affidavit . Counsel

10. Learned Senior pet it ioner could not subst ant iat e his allegat ion t o pet it ioner in Dist rict Dehradun have been nom inat ed for t raining. persons j unior t hat t here 11. Thus, int erference in t he m at t er. Accordingly, t he writ pet it ion is hereby dism issed. fails and ( M a n o j K u m a r Ti w a r i , J)

02.09.2025 Aswal NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a08b08d136951 2ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DACF4F4610C1FE 58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments