Review Application No. 490 of 2012 · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
application is allowed
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. 47 r. 1
Key paragraphs
- Para 20122012. Instant review application has been moved on behalf of the State to review my judgment and order dated 27.4.2012 and to decide the case on merit. I have perused the grounds mentioned in the application and these grounds are not such grounds as envisaged…
Judgment
Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. G.D. Joshi, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. D.C.S. Rawat, Advocate for the petitioners. Mrs. Vijayalakshmi, Brief Holder for the State. This is Delay Condonation Application No.6443 of 2012, for condoning the delay in filing the review application. Cause shown is sufficient. Delay condonation application is allowed. Delay is condoned. Also heard on the Review Application No.490 of
#2012. Instant review application has been moved on behalf of the State to review my judgment and order dated 27.4.2012 and to decide the case on merit. I have perused the grounds mentioned in the application and these grounds are not such grounds as envisaged under Order 47 Rule 1 of C.P.C. Furthermore, this Court has dealt with all the arguments in detail and has decided the writ petition on merit. The review application is accordingly dismissed. All pending applications also stand disposed of. (B.S. Verma, J.) 20.11.2012 Rajni
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: application is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. 47 r. 1.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.