M/s Reading & Bates Drilling Co v. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Dehradun
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
this Court, this appeal is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Income Tax Act, 1961 s. 9(1)(ii)
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In Commissioner of Income Tax- and another Vs. Sedco Forex International Drilling Co. Ltd. and connected cases reported in (2003) 264 ITR 320, a Division Bench of this Court held that the payment of Salary for “off period” was income earned in India, i.e.…
- Para 44. Following the above mentioned judgment of a Division Bench of this Court, this appeal is dismissed. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 28.09.2005 (Cyriac Joseph, C.J.) 28.09.2005 A
Judgment
M/s Reading & Bates Drilling Co. as agent of Mr. Fritz Verlinden C/o Nangia & Company, B-57, Soami Nagar, New Delhi- 110 017 Versus The Commissioner of Income Tax, Dehradun. Miss. Krishi Shukla/Dr. Udyog Shukla, Advocates for the appellant. Mr. S.K. Posti, Advocate for the respondent. Coram: Hon. Cyriac Joseph, C.J. Hon. J.C.S. Rawat, J. JUDGMENT CYRIAC JOSEPH, C.J. (Oral) …Appellant ….Respondent
This appeal is filed against the order dated 26.03.2004 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘F’, New Delhi in I.T.A. No. 1525/Del/2000. The appellant is the assessee. The dispute relates to the Assessment Year 1997-1998.
The substantial question of law raised in the appeal is as follows: Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal erred in law in holding that the “off period” salary paid to the appellant was liable to tax in India.
In Commissioner of Income Tax- and another Vs. Sedco Forex International Drilling Co. Ltd. and connected cases reported in (2003) 264 ITR 320, a Division Bench of this Court held that the payment of Salary for “off period” was income earned in India, i.e., for services rendered in India under Section 9(1)(ii) and that “off period salary” was taxable under section 9(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Operative part
Following the above mentioned judgment of a Division Bench of this Court, this appeal is dismissed. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.) 28.09.2005 (Cyriac Joseph, C.J.) 28.09.2005 A
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: this Court, this appeal is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Income Tax Act, 1961 — s. 9(1)(ii).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.