Anjali Tyagi v. State of Uttarakhand

employee in the firm namely M/s Octagon Builders & Promoters Pvt. Ltd. on a consolidated salary of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only. On

29.09.2017, she resigned from the said 1 assignment and thereafter t h e petitioner has no relationship with day-to-day affairs of the said firm.

4. The petitioner applied for bail in all 105 cases, the reference of which has been given in the relief clause of the petition, which are reproduced as below: S.No. Case Crime No. 477 of 2023

1. Under Sections Police Station 420 & 120B of IPC, Bahadrabad, Distt.Haridwar

2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 486 of 2023 488 of 2023 490 of 2023 491 of 2023 492 of 2023 496 of 2023 497 of 2023 505 of 2023 538 of 2023 563 of 2023 281 of 2019 211 of 2024 217 of 2024 223 of 2024 392 of 2023 401 of 2023 403 of 2023 404 of 2023 408 of 2023 409 of 2023 428 of 2023 429 of 2023 454 of 2023 456 of 2023 141 of 2024 493 of 2023 171 of 2024 173 of 2024 494 of 2023 459 of 2023 460 of 2023 463 of 2023 464 of 2023 475 of 2023 430 of 2023 435 of 2023 436 of 2023 437 of 2023 438 of 2023 441 of 2023 442 of 2023 445 of 2023 448 of 2023 451 of 2023 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 2 -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do-

46. 47. 48.

49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 73. 74. 75. 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. 81. 82. 83. 84. 85. 86. 87. 88. 89. 90. 91. 92. 93. 94. 95. 96. 97. 98.

99. 100. 452 of 2023 453 of 2023 410 of 2023 411 of 2023 412 of 2023 413 of 2023 414 of 2023 415 of 2023 416 of 2023 417 of 2023 419 of 2023 423 of 2023 424 of 2023 425 of 2023 426 of 2023 191 of 2024 192 of 2024 197 of 2024 199 of 2024 201 of 2024 203 of 2024 205 of 2024 209 of 2024 210 of 2024 165 of 2024 166 of 2024 174 of 2024 181 of 2024 187 of 2024 188 of 2024 189 of 2024 146 of 2024 147 of 2024 148 of 2024 149 of 2024 150 of 2024 151 of 2024 152 of 2024 153 of 2024 154 of 2024 156 of 2024 131 of 2024 138 of 2024 139 of 2024 140 of 2024 143 of 2024 158 of 2024 160 of 2024 161 of 2024 162 of 2024 164 of 2024 275 of 2019 Complaint Case No.273 of 2019 24 of 2024 32 of 2024 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420, 427 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 of IPC 420 of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 3 -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- 35 of 2024 37 of 2024 43 of 2024 128 of 2024 133 of 2024 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC 420 & 120B of IPC -do- -do- -do- -do- -do- The Sessions Court, Haridwar enlarged the

101. 102. 103. 104. 105.

5. petitioner on bail by separate orders in 105 cases and in one case i.e. in relation to Case Crime No.329 of 2018 Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has granted bail to the petitioner by order dated 01.12.2023 in First Bail Application No. 2546 of 2023.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was the salaried employee and she resigned much earlier from the firm in the year 2017 and she is unable to arrange separate sureties for all the cases.

7. Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State submits that in relation to Case Crime No.329 of 2018, wherein the present petitioner has been implicated for the offence under Section 2/3 of Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Co-ordinate Bench of this Court granted bail to the petitioner and therefore, seeking common sureties including Case Crime No.329 of 2018 amounts to seeking modification of the order dated 01.12.2023 passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in First Bail Application No.2546 of 2023.

8. In response to this, learned counsel for the petitioner confined his relief only in respect of the cases mentioned in relief clause except the case in relation to Case Crime No. 329 of 2018 and submits in remaining cases, the petitioner may be permitted to furnish common sureties. He further submits that in relation to Case Crime No.329 of 2018, the petitioner will abide by the terms and 4 conditions as stipulated by this Court in the order dated 01.12.2023.

9. For submitting common sureties in respect of all the cases, in which the petitioner has been directed to be released on bail, the learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance upon a judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh decided on 29.10.2018 in Special Leave to Appeal(Crl.) No(s). 8914-8915 of 2018. He submits that since the petitioner is involved in all the cases as mentioned in relief clause, the petitioner be permitted to execute a personal bond and two common sureties. Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State has no objection on this.

10. After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for parties, the petitioner is permitted to execute a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) and the same bond shall hold good for all the cases as mentioned in relief clause along with two sureties of the like amount, which shall also hold good for all the cases in relief clause except the case in relation to Case Crime No. 329 of 2018.

11. Accordingly, the present C528 Application is disposed of. SS (Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.)

25.03.2025 5