Jai Sharma v. State of Uttarakhand
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
Let the accused-applicant be released on bail on executing a
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 127, 147, 323, 325, 427, 452, 504, 506
Judgment
Operative part
Arising out of Crime No. 3/2008 Under Section 2/3 Gangster Act. P.S. Clamentown,, District Dehradun. ________________________________________________________ Hon’ble J. C. S. Rawat, J. Heard Mrs. Pushpa Joshi, Advocate for the applicant, Mr. Nandan Arya, Assistant Government Advocate for the respondent- State & also perused the record. The learned counsel for the applicant contended that as per the gangchart, there are four cases against the accused-applicant which are Crime No. 08/2001 u/s 323, 504 & 506 IPC, Crime No. 10/2001 u/s 323, 504, 506, 452, 427 IPC, Crime No. 88/2002 u/s 147, 325, 504, 506, 452, 427 IPC & Crime No. 27/2006 u/s 127, 323, 506, 325 IPC; the accused-applicant has been released on bail in all the cases; copy of bail order has been filed as Annexure-3 to the bail petition; and there is no rebuttal on behalf of the respondent-State to this fact. The learned A.G.A. did not dispute the factual aspect that the accused-applicant has been released on bail in all the cases. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case in totality, it is a fit case for bail. Let the accused-applicant be released on bail on executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Special Judge concerned. Dated 24.10.2008 V.K. (J.C.S. Rawat, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Let the accused-applicant be released on bail on executing a
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 127, 147, 323, 325, 427, 452, 504, 506.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Uttarakhand High Court, on 24 Oct 2008. The bench was C S RAWAT.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.