Manas Kum ar Hazra v. Union of I ndia and Ot hers) By t he said j udgm ent
Case Details
prot ect ed. Pet it ioner challenged his reversion by filing original applicat ion before Cent ral Adm inist rat ive Tribunal which has been dism issed by t he im pugned j udgm ent .
3. Learned Tribunal has dism issed t he original applicat ion by holding t hat since pet it ioner has not challenged t he eligibilit y condit ions for prom ot ion as Charge Man Grade- I I , which provide t hat diplom a in engineering m ust be recognized by AI CTE ( All I ndia Counsel for Technical Educat ion) , t herefore, no relief can be grant ed t o pet it ioner.
4. Adm it t edly, diplom a awarded t o pet it ioner by Janardan Rai Nagar Raj ast han Vidyapeet h ( deem ed) Universit y, Udaipur ( Raj ast han) was not recognized by AI CTE and it was sim ply approved by I ndira Gandhi Nat ional Open Universit y ( I GNOU) . The recruit m ent rules applicable for t he post of Charge m an Grade- I I are on record as Annexure No.CA2 t o t he count er affidavit filed by respondent nos.2 and 3.
5. Rule 2( i) of t he said Rules known as I ndian Ordnance Fact ories Group “ C” Supervisory and Non- Gazet t ed Cadre ( Recruit m ent and Condit ions of 2 Service) Rules, 1989 as am ended in 2003 provides t hat one m ust possess t hree years diplom a or equivalent qualificat ion cert ificat e t he respect ive field duly affiliat ed by AI CTE. I t is not in disput e t hat AI CTE is t he regulat ory body for t echnical courses, including degree and diplom a courses in engineering.
6. Since t he diplom a possessed by pet it ioner was not recognized by AI CTE, t herefore, learned Tribunal right ly held t hat qualificat ion possessed by pet it ioner do not m eet requirem ent of t he applicable recruit m ent Rules, t herefore, t here is no scope for int erference wit h t he order whereby pet it ioner’s prom ot ion was wit hdrawn.
7. Learned counsel for pet it ioner subm it s t hat Hon’ble Suprem e Court in t he case of Or i ssa Li f t I r r i g a t i o n Co r p o r a t i o n Li m i t e d Vs. Ra b i Sa n k a r Pa t r o a n d Ot h e r s report ed in ( 2 0 1 8 ) 1 SCC 4 6 8 while declaring t hat wit hout AI CI TE approval, B.Tech Degree obt ained t hrough dist ance m ode is not valid, gave one opport unit y t o such candidat es t hose were enrolled in B.Tech Course bet ween 2001 t o 2005. He subm it s t hat said j udgm ent was only qua B.Tech Degree holders and t here was no observat ion m ade in respect of diplom a holders in Engineering.
8. Per cont ra, Mr. Pankaj Chat urvedi, learned counsel appearing for t he em ployer subm it s t hat in t he aforesaid j udgm ent , Hon’ble Suprem e Court disapproved t he pract ice of issuing degree/ diplom a in Engineering courses t hrough dist ance educat ion m ode, wit hout class room t eaching. He subm it s t hat even if 3 Hon’ble Suprem e Court was not expressly dealing wit h diplom a courses in t he said j udgm ent , however, rat io of t hat j udgm ent shall apply t o diplom a courses as well t he candidat es who obt ained diplom a t hrough dist ance educat ion m ode from Janardan Rai Nagar Raj ast han Vidyapeet h ( deem ed) Universit y, Udaipur ( Raj ast han) , which was not recognized by AI CTE, cannot be t reat ed as eligible. He furt her point s out t hat Hon’ble Suprem e Court was dealing wit h a B.Tech degree awarded by t he sam e universit y in t he aforesaid j udgm ent .
9. Be t hat as it m ay, since recognit ion by AI CTE is one of t he condit ions of eligibilit y as per t he recruit m ent rules applicable for t he post of Charge m an Grade- I I and adm it t edly pet it ioner’s diplom a is not recognized by AI CTE, t herefore, learned Tribunal was j ust ified in not int erfering wit h t he order of reversion passed against t he pet it ioner.
10. Thus, we do not find any good ground t o int erfere wit h t he im pugned j udgm ent . The writ pet it ion fails and t he sam e is dism issed. ( Su b h a sh Up a d h y a y , J.) ( M a n o j K u m a r Ti w a r i , J.) 11.08.2025 SS SUKHBANT SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=71978f9c61bfde0ba69967c787b1764ea7bc7dd129a8a 6380d49b1885e628615, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=2D8B71B8D8E345F6B7F95B1DD4FB4BEBD2B7D 72C42261361AED33172F152148D, cn=SUKHBANT SINGH 4