✦ Uttarakhand High Court

JUD GE’ S ORD ERS BA 1 st N o .3 Ehasan v. St at e of Ut t arakhand ’ sh i sh

A I NAITHANI

Case at a glance

Bench
A I NAITHANI
Neutral citation
2026:UHC:1578

Outcome

Bail granted

Accordingly, bail application is allowed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. Accordingly, bail application is allowed. It is directed that the Ehasan, who has been accused in FIR/Case Crime No.87 of 2026, dated 18.02.2026 under Sections 3, 5, 11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 at Police Station Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar, be…

Judgment

Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the Applicant.

2.

Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned DAG, Mr. Pramod Tewari, learned AGA assisted by Mr. Vikash Uniyal, learned Brief Holder, for the State of Uttarakhand.

3.

In the High Court of Uttarakhand, the present case arises from Bail Application filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking regular bail for the Applicant - Ehasan, who has been accused in FIR/Case Crime No.87 of 2026, dated 18.02.2026 under Sections 3, 5, 11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 at Police Station Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar. The Applicant languishing jail since

18.02.2026.

4.

Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the Applicant has made out a case for bail.

Operative part

5.

Accordingly, bail application is allowed. It is directed that the Ehasan, who has been accused in FIR/Case Crime No.87 of 2026, dated 18.02.2026 under Sections 3, 5, 11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 at Police Station Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond with two reliable sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned court. The Applicant shall cooperate with the trial proceedings and shall not misuse the liberty granted to him. Nit esh/ ( A sh i sh N a i t h an i , J.) 1 1 .0 3 .2 0 2 6

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, bail application is allowed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 483; Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 — ss. 3, 5, 11.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Uttarakhand High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments