Sushil @ Chiku v. State of Uttaranchal
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
Considering this the bail application is allowed
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 302, 307
Judgment
Operative part
Arising out of case crime No.167of 2002 U/s 302/ 307 IPC. P.S. Gangnahar Roorkee District Haridwar Hon’ble Irshad Hussain J. By the Court Heard Sri Navneet Kaushik learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. The applicant-accused was not named in the F.I.R.. After about five months his name was told by one of the co-accused to the police. Considering this the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Sushil @ Chiku S/o Ruda Mal be released in crime no. 167/2002 under sections 302,307 I.P.C. P.S. Gangnahar Roorkeet District Haridwar on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Haridwar.
21.10..2003 ISB (Irshad Hussain J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Considering this the bail application is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 302, 307.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Uttarakhand High Court, on 21 Oct 2003.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.