✦ High Court of India · 31 Jul 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 31 Jul 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
31 Jul 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,055 words

Acts & Sections

Ms. Suraiya Naaz, learned counsel, holding brief of Mr. Lalit Sharm a, learned counsel for t he applicant s.

2. Mr. B.N. Maulakhi, learned Deput y A.G. alongwit h Mr. Akshay Lat wal, learned A.G.A. for t he St at e. present Crim inal set t ing- aside

3. The Misc. Applicat ion under sect ion 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by t he applicant s for quashing sum m oning 20.12.2016 passed by learned Judicial Magist rat e, Rudrapur, Dist rict Udham Singh Nagar in Crim inal Case No. 14816 2013 under sect ion 498- A, 323, 504 and 506 of I .P.C & 3/ 4 of Dowry Prohibit ion Act , 1961. t he

4. Learned counsel for t he applicant nos. 1 and 2 are brot her- in- law and applicant no. 3 is m arried sist er- in- law of respondent no. 2/ com plainant . Learned counsel furt her subm it s t hat applicant no. 2 is a st udent , whose dat e of birt h is 01.01.1998 and applicant no. 3, who is sist er- in- law of t he com plainant was m arried fift een years ago on 06.05.2010 and aft er m arriage, she was residing at her m at rim onial house at Baheri, Dist rict Bareilly. The allegat ions levelled against t he applicant s in t he FI R were vague. Learned counsel would furt her subm it t hat t he m at t er arises out of m at rim onial discord.

5. Per cont ra, learned counsel for t he St at e subm it s t hat t he evidence collect ed was placed before learned court below, which, aft er applying it s j udicial m ind, right ly sum m oned t he applicant s t o face t rial under t he said sect ion. t he learned counsel

6. Heard part ies available on record. perused t he t he m at erial

7. Taking int o t he fact t hat ot her m ain co- accused have been acquit t ed in t he t he applicant s have been t rial and charged wit h t he sam e- self offence as t he ot her co- accused, no fruit ful purpose would be served if t he applicant s are sent t o t he Trial Court for facing sim ilar t rial in which ot her m ain co- accused are acquit t ed on sam e charges on t he basis on sam e fact of evidence.

8. The Hon’ble Suprem e Court in a cat ena of j udgm ent s, has consist ent ly held t hat in m at rim onial disput es where levelled only specific allegat ions are against t he husband and m ot her- in- law, and t he m ain accused are subsequent ly crim inal acquit t ed, proceedings against t he rem aining co- accused serves no useful purpose. cont inuat ion The Hon’ble Suprem e Court in t he 9. case of ‘St a t e o f H a r y a n a v . Bh a j a n La l , report ed in A I R 1 9 9 2 SC 6 0 4 , has held t hat crim inal proceedings can be quashed if t hey am ount t o abuse of t he process of law or are based on vague or om nibus allegat ions. I n t he case of ‘D a r a La k sh m i N a r a y a n a o f Te l a n g a n a ’, report ed in ( 2 0 2 5 ) 3 SCC 7 3 5 , t he Hon’ble Apex Court reit erat ed t hat crim inal proceedings against in- laws wit hout specific allegat ions am ount t o m isuse of t he legal process. v . St a t e

10. I n t he present case, t he allegat ions m ade in t he com plaint are vague and do not disclose specific act s of cruelt y or dem and of dowry against t he present applicant s. I t appears t o be a case of ent ire over- im plicat ion wherein t he husband has been fam ily of crim inal unnecessarily dragged subst ant ive wit hout proceedings m at erial. int o t he

11. I n such circum st ances, allowing t he crim inal proceedings t o cont inue against t he applicant s would be an abuse of t he process of law. Therefore, t his Court is of t he considered view t hat it is a fit case t o exercise it s inherent j urisdict ion under Sect ion 482 Cr.P.C. t o secure t he ends of j ust ice. is allowed. Consequent ly,

12. Accordingly, t he present crim inal m isc. applicat ion filed under Sect ion 482 Cr.P.C. t he sum m oning order dat ed 20.12.2016 passed by learned Judicial Magist rat e, Rudrapur, Dist rict Udham Singh Nagar in Crim inal Case No. 14816 2013 under sect ion 498- A, 323, 504 and 506 of I .P.C & 3/ 4 of Dowry Prohibit ion Act , 1961 and t he ent ire proceedings arising out from it , are hereby quashed. Ujjwal (Alok Mahra, J.) 31.07.2025

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments