✦ Uttarakhand High Court

Ram Singh v. State Of Uttarakhand & Ors.

WRIT PETITION MISC. SINGLE No. 459 of 2026PANKAJ PUROHIT

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of accordingly. AK (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 25.02.2026 2

Judgment

---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. I.D. Paliwal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the State. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. According to the petitioner, he is landless agricultural labour belonging to scheduled caste community, who is entitled to allotment of land under Section 198 of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (for short “ZA & LR Act”).

2.

In this writ petition, petitioner contend that a huge chunk of land, which was declared surplus in proceedings under U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960, is available for allotment to weaker sections of society, however, claim of the petitioners for such allotment, is not being considered.

3.

Learned State Counsel, per-contra, submits that since petitioner is not the only persons eligible for allotment under Section 198 of ZA & LR Act and there are thousands of other eligible persons, therefore, 1 petitioner’s claim for allotment shall be considered as and when the exercise of allotting the land is undertaken.

4.

The writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to consider claim of the petitioner for allotment, whenever the exercise of allotting land under Section 198 of ZA & LR Act is undertaken. District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar is directed not to divert the surplus land for purposes not permitted by law.

5.

Pending application, if any, stands disposed of accordingly. AK (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 25.02.2026 2

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Uttarakhand High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. WRIT PETITION MISC. SINGLE No. 459 of 2026). ← Search more judgments