Jaipal v. State of Uttaranchal
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Jaipal S/o Sri Dharam Pal @ Gajju @ Gajadhar R/o village Nithadi P.S. Chand Pur Dehat District Bulandsahar, U.P. Vs. ---Applicant. State of Uttaranchal ----Respondent. Arising out of crime No. 658/2001 U/Ss 18/20 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 P.S. Kotwali City District Haridwar By the Court Hon’ble Irshad Hussain, J. Heard Sri Parikshit Saini learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. and perused the record. The applicant –accused was on bail in this case but on a date fixed he absented himself. It transpires that he was in jail at Aligarh in connection with some other case. He had been released on bail in the case pending at Aligarh. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case the applicant-accused is admitted to bail. The applicant-accused Jaipal shall be released in crime no. 658/2001, under sections 18/20 N.D.P.S. Act, P.S. Kotwali City, District Haridwar on his executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Haridwar. Dated 28.5.2004 ISB (Irshad Hussain, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — ss. 18, 20.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Uttarakhand High Court, on 28 May 2004. The bench was IRSHAD HUSSAIN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.