Mr. Mehboob Rahi, Advocate for & Anr. v. State of Bihar’ & Anr.
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ALOK MAHRA
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Learned State Counsel has no objection on the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the above, the writ petition 5. is disposed of with a direction to the Station House Officer, Police Station Kotwali Jwalapur, District Haridwar Investigating…
Judgment
Mr. Mehboob Rahi, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Additional Advocate General along with Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
By means of present writ petition, petitioners seek to quash the F.I.R., details whereof are given in the prayer clause.
During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the concerned Station House Officer to follow the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, passed in ‘Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and Another’, reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273, before he proceeds to arrest the petitioners.
Learned State Counsel has no objection on the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the above, the writ petition 5. is disposed of with a direction to the Station House Officer, Police Station Kotwali Jwalapur, District Haridwar Investigating Officer to follow the guidelines formulated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in ‘Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and Another’, reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273. (Alok Mahra, J.) Vacation Judge
22.01.2026 Ujjwal
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.