Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Party Name : THE S.D.O (CIVIL) & 3 ORS. Vs SMT. SARASWATI GHOSH (BISWAS) & 11 ORS. HON''BLE MR JUSTICE S.C.DAS Heard learned counsel, Mr. D. Chakraborty for the appellant-petitioners and learned senior counsel, Mr. S.M. Chakraborty, assisted by learned counsel, Ms. P. Chakraborty for respondent Nos.2, 4, 9, 10 & 11. By this application filed under Order XLI Rule 3-A of CPC the appellant-petitioners prayed for condoning the delay of 107 days in preferring RSA No.61 of 2012 challenging the judgment and decree dated 21.04.2012 passed by learned District Judge, North Tripura, Kailashahar, in Title Appeal No.09 of 2010. The reason for the delay has been assigned by the appellant-petitioners in paragraphs 3, 4, 5 and 6, which is supported by affidavit. No written objection filed on behalf of the respondents. Learned senior counsel, Mr. Chakraborty fairly submits that delay may be condoned subject to payment of some cost. I am satisfied with the reason assigned and, hence the delay is condoned subject to payment of a cost of `500/-(rupees five hundred). CM Application accordingly stands disposed of. Download Date: 8-05-2017 16:05
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.