Sri Raval Hamendra Kumar v. Cont. Cas
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 215
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 s. 12
Judgment
Sri Raju Laskar & Ors. ………..Petitioner(s) Sri Raval Hamendra Kumar, IAS & Ors. Versus …………..Respondent(s) Cont. Cas(c) 83 of 2024 Sri Nayan Barman & Ors. …………Petitioner(s) Sri Raval Hamendra Kumar, IAS & Ors. Versus …………..Respondent(s) Cont. Cas(c) 87 of 2024 Smt. Smritikana Datta & Anr. ………….Petitioner(s) Sri Raval Hamendra Kumar, IAS & Ors. Versus …………..Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s) : : Mr. A. Bhaumik, Advocate. Mr. S.S. Dey, Advocate General. Mr. D. Sarma , Addl. Govt. Advocate. Ms. A. Chakraborty, Advocate. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD
06.11.2024 ORDER Heard Mr. A. Bhaumik, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. S.S Dey, learned Advocate General assisted by Mr. D. Sarma, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate appearing for the respondents-State. [2] These present Contempt Petitions have been filed under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for drawing up contempt proceeding against the respondent-contemnors for willful and deliberate disobedience and disregard of the specific directions of this Court dated 22.02.2024, 04.03.2024,
04.03.2024 and 04.03.2024 passed in W.P.(C) No141 of 2024, W.P(C) No. 152 of 2024, W.P (C) No. 159 of 2024 and W.P (C) No. 163 of 2024. Since the subject matter involved in the writ petitions are similar and due to non- compliance of the orders of these writ petitions, these instant contempt petitions have been filed, thus the same are taken collectively for disposal in a common order. [3] When the case is called, Mr. S.S Dey, learned Advocate General appearing for the respondents-State submits before this Court that in compliance with the orders passed by this court as stated herein above, a draft Cabinet Memorandum has been prepared and placed to the concerned Higher Authority on 19.10.2024 for placing the matter before the Council of Ministers for finalization of the issue. Learned Advocate General also submits that after approval of the Council of Ministers the benefits will be provided to the petitioners. Since, the steps have already been taken by the respondents to comply with the orders of this court, this court is of the view that the instant contempt petitions be closed. [4] Accordingly, the Contempt Petitions are closed. However, it is made clear that in the event, if the petitioners are further aggrieved, it is open for them to take steps in accordance with law, if so advised. JUDGE Paritosh
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.