✦ Tripura High Court

OF TRIPURA AGARTALA B.A No. 16 of 2022 · Tripura High Court

OF TRIPURA AGARTALA B.A No. 16 of 2022INDRAJIT MAHANTY

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

Bail application stands disposed of as withdrawn

Judgment

Operative part

Shri Gouranga Datta on behalf of custody accused Shri Suman Datta The State of Tripura ----Applicant(s) Versus -----Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. J. Bhattacharjee, Advocate, Mr. S. Ghosh, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ratan Datta, P.P. HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. INDRAJIT MAHANTY 08/07/2022 Order Heard Mr. J. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the applicant and Mr. Ratan Datta, learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. This is an application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of bail filed by the applicant Shri Gouranga Datta on behalf of accused Shri Suman Datta arrested on 08.04.2022 in connection with Baikhora P.S. case No.2022/BKR/010 under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C)/25/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Learned counsel for the applicant drew the attention of this Court to an order dated 20.04.2022 whereby the bail application of accused Suman Datta came to be rejected in view of pendency of investigation. Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that several other applications have been moved from time to time but all have been turned down. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State, on the other hand, submitted that in the case at hand charge-sheet has been submitted against all accused persons on 30.06.2022. Since charge-sheet has already been submitted, the present bail application is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to move a fresh bail application before the learned trial Court and if such an application is filed, the learned trial Court would do well to consider the same expeditiously on its own merit in accordance with law. The copy of the charge-sheet submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor shall be kept on record. Bail application stands disposed of as withdrawn. (INDRAJIT MAHANTY), CJ Pulak

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Bail application stands disposed of as withdrawn

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — ss. 20(b)(ii)(C), 25, 29.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Tripura High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. OF TRIPURA AGARTALA B.A No. 16 of 2022). ← Search more judgments