OF TRIPURA AGARTALA CRP No. 16 of 2023 · Tripura High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of as not pressed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
- Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 s. 24
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 127
Judgment
Operative part
Shri Mithun Chowdhury Smt. Shilpi Bhowmik (Chowdhury) Versus .........Petitioner(s) .........Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s) : : Mr. Suman Bhattacharjee, Advocate. Mr. Samar Das, Advocate. HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. APARESH KUMAR SINGH 28/07/2023 Order The instant petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was preferred by the husband aggrieved by the order passed under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 by the learned Family Court, West Tripura, Agartala in connection with T.S. (Divorce) 565 of 2021 granting cost of litigation of Rs.10,000/- and Rs.2,000/- as monthly maintenance in favour of the respondent-wife. Petitioner was aggrieved by the grant of monthly maintenance at the rate of Rs.2,000/- per month. He has been paying Rs.7,000/- per month by virtue of an order passed under Section 127 of the Cr.P.C. However, Mr. Suman Bhattacharjee, learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions, does not seek to press the instant petition. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of as not pressed. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (APARESH KUMAR SINGH), CJ Pijush MUNNA SAHA Digitally signed by MUNNA SAHA
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of as not pressed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — s. 24; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 127.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.