COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA Crl. Petn. No.5 of 2025 Sri Chandan Debnath v. The State of Tripura
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
As such, the instant petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
Judgment
5). Mr. Ajoy Singham, Chairman and Managing Director of Spicejet of 319 Udyog Vihar, P.S-Gurgaon, Hariyana, Pin-122016. 6). Mr. Anurag Bhargava, Independent and Non-Executive Director of Spicejet, of 319 Udyog Vihar, P.S-Gurgaon, Hariyana, Pin-122016. 7). Mr. R. Sasiprabhu, Independent and Non-Executive Director of Spicejet, of 319 Udyog Vihar, P.S-Gurgaon, Hariyana, Pin-122016. 8). Shiwani Singha, Non-Executive Director of Spicejet, of 319 Udyog Vihar, P.S-Gurgaon, Hariyana, Pin-122016. 9). Mr. Mahatav Singha of Spicejet, of 319 Udyog Vihar, P.S-Gurgaon, Hariyana, Pin-122016. .........Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Debesh Chandra Roy, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Raju Datta, Public Prosecutor. HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. APARESH KUMAR SINGH 12/02/2025 Order Heard Mr. Debesh Chandra Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Raju Datta, learned Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State.
Petitioner has once again approached this Court under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C as the further investigation in respect of Agartala PS. Case No. 293/2018 have not been completed despite order dated 20.12.2022 passed by this Court in Crl. Petn. No.59/2022. Earlier the police had submitted final form showing the case to be on mistake of fact. On protest by the informant- petitioner, the learned trial Court vide order dated 01.10.2020 directed further investigation. Since investigations were not being concluded in time, petitioner had approached this Court in Crl. Petn. No.59/2022. However, despite a specific order passed in the said case, investigation has not been completed till now. Therefore, petitioner has once again approached this Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. Mr. Raju Datta, learned Public Prosecutor has on written instructions submitted that the investigating officer has submitted a final report (civil in nature) in the instant case before the learned Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Tripura, Agartala.
Operative part
It is submitted that therefore, this Court may not be required to pass any further orders in this regard. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that liberty may be granted to the petitioner to raise an objection, if so advised, to the latest final form submitted by the agency. Accordingly, liberty is granted to do so. As such, the instant petition is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (APARESH KUMAR SINGH), CJ Munna MUNNA SAHA Digitally signed by MUNNA SAHA
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: As such, the instant petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.