R/o Village Badangarhi, Alwar, Raj v. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of

Renu Shrimali D/o Laxmi Kant Shrimali, Aged About 51 Years, R/o 705, Shahi Apartment, Sector-13, Ayad (Rural), Udaipur, Raj.

14. Dr. Annapurna Sharma W/o Pradeep Sharma, Aged About [2025:RJ-JP:6562] (2 of 8) [CW-19009/2024] 42 Years, R/o D-8-A, Ashirwad Nagar, Roop Sagar Road, Sobhagpura, Udaipur, Raj.

15. Dr. Indra Singh Chouhan S/o Pratap Singh Chouhan, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Dholiya, Pali, Raj.

16. Dr. Chhavi Kumari Joshi D/o Roshan Lal Joshi, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Nandwel, Udaipur, Raj.

17. Dr. Kamlesh Kumar Tank S/o Jamna Lal Tank, Aged About 35 Years, R/o House No- 58, Bhil Mohalla, Village- Dhola Ka Dhaneriya, Dhaneriya, Udaipur, Raj.

18. Usham Vaishnav D/o Laxminarayan Vaishnav, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Ward No. 14, 253 B, Chaman Colony, Chaksu, Jaipur. Raj.

19. Jaishree Chundawat D/o Samundra Singh Chundawat, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Bangala Basti, Koshithal, Bhilwara, Raj.

20. Dr. Shyo Chand S/o Prabhu Ram, Aged About 41 Years, R/o 22, Rwd-B, 25 Rwd, Rawatsar, Hanumangarh, Raj.

21. Dr. Sunita Nimawat W/o Bhagwati Lal Nimawat, Aged About 42 Years, R/o 177, Amba Mata Scheme, Shastri Circle, Udaipur, Raj.

22. Shyam Lal Meghwal S/o Har Lal, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Meghwalo Ka Mohalla, Wasni Khurd, Udaipur, Raj.

23. Dr. Govind Lal Sargada S/o Kaliya Sargada, Aged About 40 Years, R/o New Colony, Mukam And Post- Chitri, Cheentri, Dungarpur, Raj.

24. Dr. Kamal Kumar Ameta S/o Arvind Kumar Ameta, Aged About 43 Years, R/o 1- Gayatri Nagar, Dholi Mangri (In Front Of Transport Nagar), Pratapnagar, Vtc- Bedwas (Rural), Po- Zinc Smelter, Sub-Dist.-Girwa, Udaipur, Raj.

25. Dr. Rama Ameta W/o Anil Ameta, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Kulmiyo Ka Chouraya, Vallabhnagar, Udaipur, Raj.

26. Ganesh Lal Patel S/o Punja Ji, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Vtc- Dhakarda, Po- Sagtara, Sub Dist. Sarada, Dist.- Udaipur, Raj.

27. Dr. Indu Tiwari W/o Deshbhandu, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Bartu Mohalla, Village Bhil, Tehsil - Bhim, Dist. Rajsamand. Raj.

28. Pankaj Nath Yogi S/o Sukha Nath Yogi, Aged About 26 [2025:RJ-JP:6562] (3 of 8) [CW-19009/2024] Years, R/o Sabalpura, Asind, P.o. Darawat Co, Dist.- Bhilwara, Raj.

29. Prakash Suthar S/o Ramkaran Suthar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village- Gajsinghpura, Jodhpur, Raj.

30. Dr. Hukma Ram Khakhal S/o Suja Ram Khakhal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Khakhalo Ki Dhani, Village- Barwala Nagaur.

31. Ravi Kumar Meena S/o Shivcharan, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village And Post- Jhareda, Karauli, Raj.

32. Gajraj Singh S/o Kedar Lal Jat, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village- Kunsay, Raipur, Sawai Madhopur, Raj.

33. Ashok Kumar Sharma S/o Rugani, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Village - Badangarhi, Alwar, Raj. ----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. Commissioner, College Education, Shiksha Sankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.150/2025

1. Rekha Tailor W/o Shailendra Mohan Tailor, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 86, Chaumukha, Panwaliya, Tonk, Raj.

2. Gopal Lal Dheru S/o Mishri Lal Dheru, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Karati, Bandwara, Dist. Ajmer, Raj.

3. Dr. Babita Sharma W/o Puneet Kumar Awasthi, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village And Tehsil- Nadouti, Karauli, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. Commissioner, College Education, Shiksha Sankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur. ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:6562] (4 of 8) [CW-19009/2024] S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.275/2025

1. Dr. Deepesh Yadav S/o Mangilal Yadav, Aged About 41 Years, R/o 2 C 2, Housing Board Colony, Jhalawar, Jhalawar City, Rajasthan.

2. Dr. Ravindra Modi S/o Chandmal Modi, Aged About 37 Years, R/o House No. 65, Sai Villa, Kalidas Colony, Jhalawar, Rajasthan.

3. Dr. Ankita Nagria W/o Ashok Kumar Mobiya, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Kumhar Mohalla, Govt. College Ke Piche, Ward No. 6M. N. 187, Jhalawar, Rajasthan.

4. Bal Chand Regar S/o Ram Lal Regar, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Borda Baran, Bilendi, Rajasthan.

5. Dr. Neelam Gupta W/o Hemant Khandelwal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o House No. 3 K 10, Dadabadi Extension, Narsia Ji Jain Mandir Road, Kota, Dadabadi Kota, Kota, Rajasthan.

6. Dr. Renu Sharma W/o Mahesh Kumar, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Gayatri Mandir Ke Pass, Gayatri Nagar, Kherliganj, Atru, Baran, Rajasthan.

7. Dr. Beenu Sharma W/o Ashok Kumar Sharma, Aged About 46 Years, R/o 50, Lodha Moahalla Ditiy, Jheenta Pura, Jhalawar, Rajasthan.

8. Dr. Hemlata Vaishnav D/o Vishnu Das Vaishnav, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Vishvkarma Automobiles, Savita Colony, Nimbahera, Chittaurgarh, Rajasthan.

9. Dr. Rohit Kumar S/o Shiv Lal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o House No. 350, Gadhemau, Kasimpur, Katra Kasimpura, Fatehpur, Uttar Pradesh.

10. Dr. Sher Singh S/o Nirbhai Singh, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Gali No. 3, Rangpur Road, Shiv Mandir Ke Samne, J.p. Colony, Kota Jn., Kota, Rajasthan.

11. Shilpa Karuirya D/o Manoj Kumar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o G-557, Bombey Yojna, J. K. Nagar, Udyog Puri, Kota, Rajasthan.

12. Dr. Ravi Kumar Verma S/o Hori Lal Verma, Aged About 43 Years, R/o 653, Mahaveer Nagar -2, Keshavpura, Vigyan Nagar, Kota, Rajasthan.

13. Mukesh Kumar Verma S/o Madho Lal Verma, Aged About [2025:RJ-JP:6562] (5 of 8) [CW-19009/2024] 43 Years, R/o Badoli, Baroli, Balunda, Deoli, Tonk, Rajasthan.

14. Banshidhar S/o Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Gram Dholas, Laxmangarh, Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. Commissioner, College Education, Shiksha Sankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sankalp Vijay for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 14/02/2025

1. Since common question of facts and law are involved in all these three petitions, hence with the consent of counsel for the parties, these matters are taken up for final disposal and are being decided by this common order.

2. For convenience the prayer mentioned in SB Civil Writ Petition No.19009/2024 has been taken into consideration, which reads as under:- “(I) Action of the respondents by which they are not allowing petitioners to continue their posts of college lecturers under vidya sambal yojana in respective colleges in respective subject may kindly be held illegal and arbitrary. [2025:RJ-JP:6562] (6 of 8) [CW-19009/2024] (II) By Appropriate writ of direction the respondents may kindly be directed to allow petitioners to continue on the post of college lecturer under vidya sambal yojana in respective colleges in respective subject for next academic session 2024-2025/next academic semester further academic sessions/semesters and also directed to respondents not to terminate services of petitioners till availability of vacant post in any Govt. College in State of Rajasthan in subject of petitioners. (III) Any other relief which this Court may deems fit and proper be granted to the petitioners.”

3. By way of filing this writ petition, a prayer has been made to continue the petitioners as College Lecturer under the Vidhya Sambal Yojna and not to replace them from another set of contractual employees in pursuance of the advertisement dated

21.01.2025.

4. During the course of arguments, it is apprised to this Court that the similar controversy involved in this petition, came before this Court in the case of “Ram Chaturvedi & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.” (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1474/2023) and the said controversy has been set at rest with the following directions:- “(i) Respondents while engaging the Guest Faculty in the session 2023-24 in various colleges/universities under the Raj-CES under Vidya Sambal Scheme, shall give preference to engage the petitioners who have already rendered services as Guest Faculty in this scheme in the previous sessions/years, at previous place of posting or nearby place obviously subject to availability of vacancies in the previous [2025:RJ-JP:6562] (7 of 8) [CW-19009/2024] college/university or nearby place as well as after considering the satisfactory services of petitioners. (ii) Petitioners who have been engaged as Guest Faculty in the previous sessions shall not be dislodged/replaced from its previous place with fresh appointment of Guest Faculty, subject to availability of vacant post and need of engagement. (iii) After re-engagement/adjustment of the petitioners i.e. previous Guest Faculty in the Vidya Sambal Scheme, against vacancies for the year 2023-24, the remaining vacant posts of previous years, and on the new vacancies accrued in session 2023-24 may be filled by the fresh aspirants in accordance with the criteria of selection prescribed in the scheme. (iv) It is made clear that petitioners who were already engaged in the previous sessions and are willing for appointment/engagement in the present session 2023-24 in the Vidya Sambal Scheme, are required to apply afresh pursuant to advertisement issued by respondents and his/her re- engagement in the Vidya Sambal Scheme for session 2023-24 would be governed by terms and conditions of the scheme and shall not create any additional equity/claim which is not available in the scheme.”

5. In the aforesaid case of Ram Chaturvedi (supra), the Coordinate Bench of this Court has issued directions to the respondents to give preference to engage the co-petitioners, who have already rendered services as Guest Faculty in this scheme in the previous sessions/years.

6. Since the controversy involved in these writ petitions has already been set at rest in the case of Ram Chaturvedi (supra), this Court finds no valid reason to take a different view. [2025:RJ-JP:6562] (8 of 8) [CW-19009/2024]

7. In view of the above, these writ petitions stand disposed of with direction to the respondents to give preference to the petitioners by making appointment in pursuance of the advertisement dated 21.01.2025.

8. Stay applications and all pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. Karan/217-219 (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J