S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13855/2025 v. Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14172/2025
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SAMEER JAIN
- Neutral citation
- 2026:RJ-JP:12555
Provisions considered
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 s. 483
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ss. 61(2), 112(2), 318(2), 318(4)
- Information Technology Act, 2000 s. 66D
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicants Naveen Singh Rajpoot S/o Shri Jitendra Singh Rajpoot, Gograj S/o Kanhaiyalal, Vikash Kumar Saini S/o Shri Moolchand Saini, Ashok Nagar S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad & Banwarilal Kumawat S/o…
Judgment
Vikash Kumar Saini S/o Shri Moolchand Saini, R/o Ward No. 06 Neta Wali Dhani, Police Station Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan (Presently Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu). State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp Versus ----Applicant ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14421/2025 Ashok Nagar S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad, R/o Regrow Ka Mohalla Dhodsar Police Station Govindgarh, District Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu). State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp Versus ----Applicant ----Respondent [2026:RJ-JP:12555] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13855/2025] S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14541/2025 Banwarilal Kumawat S/o Shri Dewaram, Resident Of Badhal, Police Station Renwal, District Jaipur. (Accused Presently Confined In District Jail, Jhunjhunu) Versus ----Applicant The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arun Singh Shekhawat Mr. Kunal Sharma Mr. Ishan Mishra Ms. Rashmi Meena Mr. Naman Gurjar for Mr. K.K. Bhinda Mr. Arpan Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 25/03/2026
The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicants. The accused-applicants were arrested in connection with FIR No. 222/2025 registered at Police Station Nawalgarh District Jhunjhunu for the offence(s) under Sections 318(2), 318(4), 61(2), 112(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of IT Act.
Learned counsel for the applicants have submitted that the applicants are young persons, aged approximately in the range of 25-30 years. It is further submitted that the charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter and that the trial will take its own time to conclude. [2026:RJ-JP:12555] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13855/2025]
Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that there exist multitude of complaints registered against the applicants on the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal (Registered through No.1930). It is further submitted that there also exist numerous financial transactions which established the nexus of the applicants to the alleged cyber crime.
Having heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, considering that the applicants are young persons, aged approximately in the range of 25-30 years; that the charge- sheet has already been filed in the matter, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicants and enlarge them on bail.
Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicants Naveen Singh Rajpoot S/o Shri Jitendra Singh Rajpoot, Gograj S/o Kanhaiyalal, Vikash Kumar Saini S/o Shri Moolchand Saini, Ashok Nagar S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad & Banwarilal Kumawat S/o Shri Dewaram shall be enlarged on bail provided they furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- each with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. JKP/30-34 (SAMEER JAIN),J
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.