Liladhar Swami v. Through Its Registrar General
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. We are of the view that insofar as the case of the petitioner is concerned, the same stands concluded as the writ petition was [2025:RJ-JP:329-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-16697/2024] dismissed and the SLP filed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court was also dismissed. Even review…
- Para 44. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ SANJAY KUMAWAT/RAJAT/36
Judgment
The High Court Of Judicature For Rajasthan, At Jodhpur Through Its Registrar General.
The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary To The Government, Law And Legal Affairs Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Javed Khan with Ms. Nishita Gambhir For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.K. Maloo, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Harsh Pratap Singh Ms. Aditi Vats on behalf of Mr. Bharat Vyas, AAG HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 03/01/2025
2. Heard. By way of this petition, the petitioner seeks to reopen the merits of an enquiry and the order passed in disciplinary action on the ground that in a subsequent decision of this Court in the case of Miss Seema Jain Vs. The Rajasthan High Court & Anr. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10126/2016, decided on
07.07.2023), it has been held that issuance of charge-sheet was bad in law.
We are of the view that insofar as the case of the petitioner is concerned, the same stands concluded as the writ petition was [2025:RJ-JP:329-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-16697/2024] dismissed and the SLP filed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court was also dismissed. Even review petition and curative petition have also been dismissed. Therefore, this petition is not maintainable.
Operative part
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ SANJAY KUMAWAT/RAJAT/36
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.