✦ High Court of India · 26 Sep 2025

The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP vs Connected With

Case Details High Court of India · 26 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
26 Sep 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,116 words

: Mr. Dheeraj Singhal Mr. Dushyant Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 26/09/2025 S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12289/2025:- [2025:RJ-JP:39894] (2 of 6) [CRLMB-12289/2025]

1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicants-accused Mahadevi W/o Chhitariya, Bejanti W/o Prakash and Shreemati W/o Ramveer seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.306/2025 dated 09.09.2025 registered at P.S. Sadar Dholpur, District Dholpur for the offence under Sections 190, 191(3), 121(2), 132, 109(1), 285 of BNS and Section 3 of PPD Act.

2. Learned counsel for the applicants submit that the applicants, have been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against them is complete and they are no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicants-accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. The applicants do not have any criminal antecedents. He also submits that the applicants undertake not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time.

3. Learned counsel for applicants-accused submitted that applicants-accused are female and are in custody since long and trial will take its time and from tomorrow, there is Navaratra and Vijayadashmi Festival and for celebrating the said Festivals with family members, the applicants may be enlarged on bail.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications and submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants-accused. [2025:RJ-JP:39894] (3 of 6) [CRLMB-12289/2025]

5. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties.

6. Having considered the submissions advanced on behalf of both parties and upon perusal of the material available on record, the Court finds that the grounds raised in support of the bail application, coupled with other facts such as absence of any apprehension regarding absconding of applicants- accused, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses, it is justified to grant of bail.

7. Thus, the instant bail applications filed on behalf of applicants-accused Mahadevi W/o Chhitariya, Bejanti W/o Prakash and Shreemati W/o Ramveer, are hereby allowed and the applicants-accused are ordered to be released on bail with condition that each of the applicant would furnish a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicants-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicants-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. [2025:RJ-JP:39894] (4 of 6) [CRLMB-12289/2025] (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicants-accused shall be liable to be canceled.

8. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12623/2025:-

1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Ramdeen S/o Lahore seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.306/2025 dated

09.09.2025 registered at P.S. Sadar Dholpur, District- Dholpur, for the offence under Sections 190, 191(3), 121(2), 132, 109(1), 285 of BNS and Section 3 of PPD Act.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant, has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant-accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. The applicant does not have any criminal antecedents. He also submits that the applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time.

3. Learned counsel for applicant-accused submitted that general allegations were made against all persons and no specific role is attributed against present applicant and from tomorrow, there is Navaratra and Vijayadashmi Festival and for celebrating [2025:RJ-JP:39894] (5 of 6) [CRLMB-12289/2025] the said Festivals with family members, the applicant may be enlarged on bail.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications and submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant-accused.

5. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties.

6. Having considered the submissions advanced on behalf of both parties and upon perusal of the material available on record, the Court finds that the grounds raised in support of the bail application, coupled with other facts such as absence of any apprehension regarding absconding of applicant-accused, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses, it is justified to grant of bail.

7. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Ramdeen S/o Lahore, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail with condition that applicant would furnish a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. [2025:RJ-JP:39894] (6 of 6) [CRLMB-12289/2025] (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicants-accused shall be liable to be canceled.

8. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /217 & 40-S(Court No.19)

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments