Balaji, Sikar Road, Jaipur v. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur Through Its
Case Details
Judgment
1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur Through Its Chairman, State Agriculture Management Institution Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur.
2. Director, Department Of Treasury And Accounts, Rajasthan, Vit Bhawan, A-Block, Jyoti Nagar, Janpath, Jaipur-302005.
3. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government Secretaritat, Jaipur.
4. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretary Jaipur.
5. The Revenue Board, Through Its Registrar, Ajmer ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15486/2024 Rashmi Kanojiya D/o Shri Dori Lal Kanojiya, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of B-23, Data Nagar, Jattiya Hills Ajmer-305001 Versus ----Petitioner
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur
5. The Director, Treasury And Accounts, Jaipur The Revenue Board, Through Its Registrar, Ajmer Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur Through Its Secretary, Rajasthan Agriculture Management Institute Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur-302018 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15935/2024 ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:35339] (2 of 9) [CW-15294/2024]
Divya Kumari D/o Shri Deepak Kumar W/o Shri Govinda Kumar Gupta, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of 9A, Pratap Nagar-2, Tonk Phatak, Jaipur-302015 Versus ----Petitioner
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
5. The Director, Treasury And Accounts, Jaipur. The Revenue Board, Through Its Registrar, Ajmer. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur Through Its Secretary, Rajasthan Agriculture Management Institute Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur- 302018 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17510/2024 Vimal Kumar Meena S/o Jabbhu Lal Meena, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Bhadkya, Post Beejalpur, Tehsil Karauli (Raj.) ----Respondents Versus ----Petitioner
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Director, Department Of Information And Public Relations (Dipr), Jaipur, Rajasthan
2. Chairman, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur, Rajasthan
3. Chairman, Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministerial Services Selection Board, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17901/2024
1. Deepak Bansal S/o Shri Subhash Chandra Agarwal, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 1, Udhyog Nagar Vistar, Road No. 8 Ke Samne, Vkia, Sikar Road, Jaipur
2. Rameshwar Prasad Meena S/o Shri Gopal Lal Meena, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Village Hariyana, Dhani Berka, Post Khanwas, Tehsil Lawan, District Dausa
3. Dinesh Kumar Meena S/o Shri Bhagwan Sahay Meena, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village Shri [2025:RJ-JP:35339] (3 of 9) [CW-15294/2024] Ramgopalpura, Post Neemla, Tehsil Andhi, Jaipur
4. Neeraj Meena S/o Shivram Meena, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Village Post Chandera, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa-303509 ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur
2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur
3. The Director, Treasury And Accounts, Jyoti Nagar, Lalkothi, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302007
4. The Revenue Board, Through Its Registrar, Basant Vihar Ajmer 305001
5. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board Jaipur, Through Its Secretary, Rajasthan Agriculture Management Institute Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur-302018 ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18576/2024 Sachin Agrawal S/o Shri Surender Kumar, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Near Police Station Chohtan, District Barmer- 344702 (Raj.) Versus ----Petitioner
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.
5. The Director, Treasury And Accounts, Jaipur. The Revenue Board, Through Its Registrar, Ajmer. Raajsthan Staff Selection Board Jaipur, Through Its Secretary, Rajasthan Agriculture Management Institute Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur- 302018 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 215/2025 Himanshu Roy S/o Shri Rajendar Kumar, Aged About 30 Years, ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:35339] (4 of 9) [CW-15294/2024] Resident Of H.no. 433, Gali No. 4, Baba Ramdeo Mandir Ke Pass, Indra Colony, Sri Ganganagar (Raj.) Versus ----Petitioner
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. The Director, Treasury And Accounts, Vitt Bhawan, Janpath, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4. The Revenue Board, Through Its Registrar, Gokhale Lane, Opp. Collectorate Office Basant Vihar, Todarmal Marg, Civil Lines, Ajmer, Rajasthan 305001
5. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur Through Its Secretary, Rajasthan Agriculture Management Institute Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur-302018 ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 269/2025 Preeti Nagar D/o Shri Brij Mohan Nagar W/o Shri Akash Nagar, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of H.no. 6-S-3, Mahaveer Nagar Vistar Yojna, Kota (Raj.) Versus ----Petitioner
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur
2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.
5. The Director, Treasury And Accounts, Jaipur. The Revenue Board, Through Its Registrar, Ajmer. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur Through Its Secretary, Rajasthan Agriculture Management Institute Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur-302018 ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 277/2025
1. Dheerendra Kumar Nagar S/o Shri Daya Krishan Nagar, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Nearby Narsingh Sr. Sec. School, Sarovar Nagar, Itawa, District Kota. [2025:RJ-JP:35339] (5 of 9) [CW-15294/2024]
2. Tosif Raza S/o Mohammed Saddiq, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of 187, Khatiyon Ka Mohalla, Ratakot, Bijai Nagar, Ajmer.
3. Pratibha Sharma D/o Shri Krishan Kumar Sharma, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of 71, Swarn Vihar-Ist, Opp. Parvatipuram Kunhari, Kota.
4. Rahul Kumar Meena S/o Shri Mohan Swaroop Meena, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Kakruwa, Tehsil Roopwas, District Bharatpur.
5. Aashirvaad Sharma S/o Shri Dinesh Kumar Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of A-29, Agrawal Nagar, Behind Gulkandi Dei Sr. Sec. School, Gangapurcity, District Gangapurcity.
6. Jitendra Kumar Meena S/o Shri Girraj Prasad Meena, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village Alooda, Pos Jeerna, Tehsil Nadoti, District Gangapurcity.
7. Nirmala D/o Shri Dala Ram W/o Shri Dhiraj Kumar, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 125, Sainik Basti, Nagaur.
8. Ashutosh Yadav S/o Shri Dinesh Kumar Yadav, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Mukam Post Jaisinghpura, Tehsil Virat Nagar, District Kotputli-Behror.
9. Satyendra Pal Singh S/o Shri Mohan Lal Jatiya, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Laxmi Nagar, Village Devkhera, Alwar.
10. Nisha Yadav D/o Shri Mange Ram W/o Shri Pradeep, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Vpo Ghaseda, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur
2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur
5. The Director, Treasury And Accounts, Jaipur The Revenue Board, Through Its Registrar, Ajmer Rajasthan Staff Selection Board Jaipur, Through Its Secretary, Rajasthan Agriculture Management Institute [2025:RJ-JP:35339] (6 of 9) [CW-15294/2024] Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur-302018 ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 304/2025 Kalpana Lamba D/o Shri Rajendra Singh Lamba W/o Late Shri Jitendra Moond, Aged About 41 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 21, Street No. 2, Loharu Road, New Colony, Pilani (Raj.) Versus ----Petitioner
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.
5. The Director, Treasury And Accounts, Jaipur. The Revenue Board Through Its Registrar, Ajmer. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur Through Its Secretary, Rajasthan Agriculture Management Institute Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur- 302018. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 971/2025 Parvinder Kour D/o Gurmeet Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ward No.01, Village Dungarsinghpura, P.o. Ganeshgarh, District Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioner
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, Finance Department, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Treasury And Accounts Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumil Kumar Chechi & Mr. Sumit Khandelwal in S.B. CWP No. [2025:RJ-JP:35339] (7 of 9) [CW-15294/2024] For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sandeep Maheshwari with Ms. Bhavana Ladha Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG Mr. Aditya Godara in S.B. CWP No. Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Umesh Choudhary for V.D. Gathala, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 03/09/2025
1. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the above matters were heard finally and are being decided by this common order.
2. The issue involved in the present cases is whether holding the degree of B.Tech can be treated as sufficient qualification for holding the post of Junior Accountant and Tehsildar Revenue Accountant pursuant to advertisement dated
20.06.2023, whereas the aforesaid advertisement prescribes possession of RS-CIT Certificate as the necessary qualification in addition to the academic qualification mentioned in the advertisement.
3. Vide order dated 27.03.2025, this Court directed the Principal Secretary, Finance Department, and Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel, to provide a consolidated decision/opinion regarding whether the B.Tech degree can be considered equivalent to an RS-CIT Certificate or falls under the eligibility criteria vis-a-vis instant selection process.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that, in compliance with the order dated 27.03.2025, a Committee was [2025:RJ-JP:35339] (8 of 9) [CW-15294/2024] constituted, and meeting of the Committee was convened on
10.06.2025. After considering all the factors, it was decided in the meeting that degree of BE/B.Tech in any branch of Engineering is equivalent to RS-CIT, and the candidate’s eligibility should be determined accordingly. In the application filed on behalf of respondent No. 1 and 3, it has been mentioned that the Committee had treated the computer subjects in all/some semesters of different streams at both Graduation and Post- Graduation levels as equivalent to RS-CIT, and recommending that candidate’s eligibility be determined accordingly.
5. In the said meeting dated 10.06.2025, Committee has also taken a conscious decision to hold that the candidates possessing computer concept certificate (CCC) issued by the NIELT are also equivalent certificates to that of RSCIT certificate. As such, persons holding the CCC are also eligible for the aforementioned recruitment examination.
6. In the light of above decision taken by the respondent- Government itself, it is declared that degree of BE/B.Tech and CCC shall be considered as sufficient qualification for determining the eligibility of the candidates wherever the requirement is to possess certificate of RS-CIT.
7. In light of above, the writ petitions are allowed with the direction to treat the petitioners as eligible for participating in the recruitment process for the post of Junior Accountant and Tehsildar Revenue Accountant, pursuant to order dated
20.06.2023. The result of the petitioners is directed to be declared. In case, names of the petitioners are found at [2025:RJ-JP:35339] (9 of 9) [CW-15294/2024] appropriate place in the merit list, appointment orders be issued in favour of the petitioners with all consequential benefits.
8. Hence, the writ petitions are allowed. NEERU/124-125-126-127-128-129-132-133-134-135-141 (ANAND SHARMA),J