State Education Department ors v. Connected

: Mr. Jai Prakash Gupta Mr. Govind Gupta Mr. Tanmay Dhand Mr. Akshit Gupta Mr. Vijay Pathak (4 of 6) [CW-8574/2012] Mr. Satyapal Poshwal Mr. Deepak Pareek Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Naveen Dhuwan Mr. R. D. Meena Mr. Rakesh Kumar Saini Mr. Vinayak Joshi Mr. P. Singh Mr. K. C. Sharma Mr. Mahesh Chand Gupta Mr. Anil Jain Mr. Mahendra Singh Mr. Dharmendra Jain Mr. Nitish Bagri Mr. Manish K Sharma Mr. Vikash Kabra Ms. Ritu Somani Mr. D. K. Bhardwaj Mr. Sandeep Pathak Mr. Anil Kumar Mr. Zakir Hussain Mr. Vinod Goyal Mr. Sunil Saini Mr. C. P. Sharma Mr. Harendra Singh Ms. Nidhi Khandelwal Mr. Sanjay Mehla with Ms. Sunita Mehla Mr. Timan Singh Mr. Karan Pal Singh Mr. Mahipal Kharra Mr. G. S. Gouttam Mr. Rakesh Kumar Saini Mr. Sanjay Khedar Mr. Surendra Singh Mr. Rahunandan Sharma Mr. Saransh Saini Mr. N. K. Songara Mr. Ravi Jangir Ms. Sudesh kasana Mr. Pradeep Kalwaniya Mr. B. R. Rana Mr. Kuldeep Kumar Sharma Mr. Laxmi Kant Malpura For Respondent(s) : Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, AAG Mr. M. F. Baig Mr. Kesar Singh Shekhawat, AGC Ms. Namita Parihar, Dy. G. C. Ms. Manju Joshi, AGC Ms. Sara Parveen for Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG (5 of 6) [CW-8574/2012] Ms. Karishma Soni for Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, AGC Mr. Pawan Pareek HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 04/04/2025 Vide order dated 16.01.2025 passed in SBCWP No.13880/2024, categorical directions were spelled out for the registry to list the matters pertaining to old/stale recruitments/appointment processes before the Court. In compliance of the aforementioned directions registry has listed a bunch of matters before the Court under class Code 515 which pertain to recruitment and appointment. It is clarified that the present order qua the petitions herein and the petitions connected with the lead petition henceforth, the orders passed now onwards shall be treated as a part and parcel of the further orders and the judgment shall be made applicable on mutatis mutandis basis. Learned counsel for the respondent-State has apprised the Court with the fact that subsequent to the impugned recruitment(s), fresh recruitment processes have taken place, and as on date no seats are lying vacant (in majority of petitions), as per the relevant Rules moreover, the waiting list(s) has/have also lapsed. Therefore, the instant petition(s)/ a number of petitions from the instant bunch of matters have rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioners has refuted the aforementioned averments therefore, in the interest of justice, an (6 of 6) [CW-8574/2012] opportunity of 7 days is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioners to substantiate the contentions/refusal made by him/them, and place on record the relevant documents. Considering the ratio passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Shankaran Dash Vs. Union of India reported in (1991) 3 SCC 47 and State of Orissa & Anr. Vs. Raj Kishore Nanda & Ors. reported in (2010) 6 SCC 777, this Court is of the view that if the aforementioned are not complied with, the instant petition(s) shall be dismissed as rendered infructuous. Let these cases be listed on 02.05.2025 under the head of “Recruitment Matters”. Pooja /63-150 (SAMEER JAIN),J