Rajasthan v. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary

Judgment

8. Manish Kumar Rachhouya S/o Prabhu Dayal, Aged About [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (2 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]

23. 32 Years, R/o 31-B, Ambedkar Nagar, Kartarpura Phatak, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Divyank Dhumas S/o Surat Ram Dhumas, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Chhipo Ka Mohalla, Phooliya Kalan, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan. Sulochana Dhumas D/o Surat Ram Dhumas, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Chhipo Ka Mohalla, Phooliya Kalan, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan. Saral Saini D/o Jagdish Mali, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Nainshukh Ki Baghiya, Jinshi, Ward No. 4, Tonk, Rajasthan. Arpit Singhal S/o Rameshwar Prasad Gupta, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Agrasen Colony, Gangapurcity, Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. Ajay Kumar S/o Kanhaiya Lal Bagdi, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Behind Bagdi Bhawan, Nehru Nagar, Shri Nagar Road, Ajmer, Rajasthan. Anil Acharya S/o Shankar Lal Acharya, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Shiv Colony, 100 Feet Road, Raj Nagar, District Rajsamand, Rajasthan. Asish Patanwal S/o Lallu Lal Mahawar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Opposite State Ware House, Choudhary Colony, Agra Road, Dausa, Rajasthan. Ravikant Sharma S/o Bhairu Ram Sharma, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Pataliyo Ki Dhani, Jaipur Road, Thanagazi, Alwar, Rajasthan. Saroj Kumari D/o Het Ram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Dinarpura, Post Katrathal, District Sikar, Rajasthan. Devashish Dasaya S/o Heera Lal Dasaya, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Suraj Pol Gate Ke Pass, Manohar Thana, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan. Anil Kumar Nagar S/o Janki Lal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Dhakad Mohalla, Sirpoi, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan. Anita Dasaya D/o Ramesh Chand, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Suraj Pol Gate, Manohar Thana, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan. Ajay Kumar Soyal S/o Shiv Ji Ram Soyal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Rajmahal, Tehsil Deoli, District Tonk, Rajasthan. Deepak Kumar S/o Rakesh Kumar, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Patidar Mohalla, Vpo Dhabla Khinchi, Tehsil Sunel, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan. Rakesh Kumar Rana S/o Rameshwar Prasad Rana, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Pratappura, Post Jorpura, Tehsil Jobner, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.

24. Bhartendu Lawaniya S/o Suresh Kumar Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ward House Road, Katara Goyal [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (3 of 46) [CW-16144/2024] Computer Ke Samne, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan.

25. Mohit Didel S/o Dharm Singh Choudhary, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Didel Ki Dhani, Itawa, Phulera, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

29. Rajeev Chimpa S/o Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Vpo Khyaliwala, 11 Lnp, District Sriganganagar, Rajasthan. Amit Rawat S/o Anoop Kumar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Gali No. 10, Vishnupuri Colony, Near Hathras City, Railway Station, District Hathras, Uttar Pradesh. Shubham Chouhan S/o Ashok Chouhan, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Near National Fitness Centre, Siyaram Nagar, Chandravardai Nagar, Ajmer, Rajasthan Lokendra Singh Chauhan S/o Babu Singh Chauhan, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Prempura, Post Khan Bhankhari, Tehsil And District Dausa, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

7. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12099/2024 Sanjeev Kumar Kaparela S/o Rishi Kesh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Near Railway Station, Krishna Colony, Bari, Tehsil Bari, District Dholpur, Rajasthan. Jeetendra Kumar Sharma S/o Santram Sharma, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Jaganer Road, Timasiya, Tehsil Baseri, District Dholpur, Rajasthan. Yogesh Kumar Sharma S/o Jagdish Prasad Sharma, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Near Rajmahal Marriage Home, Patel Nagar Road, Behror, District Alwar, Rajasthan. Ashok Kumar Meena S/o Radheshyam Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vpo Shreema, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan. Nikhilesh Sharma S/o Madan Mohan Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, R/o 151, Maliyon Ki Dhani, Sumel, Keshav Vidhya Peeth, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Mohan Lal Meghwal S/o Tara Ram, Aged About 36 Years, R/o 446, Naya Meghwal Vas, Jamotara, Post Bhutgaon, District Sirohi, Rajasthan. Priyanka Pancholi D/o Gordhan Pancholi, Aged About 33 Years, R/o H. No. 45, Gate No. 3, Rajat Grah Colony, Bundi, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (4 of 46) [CW-16144/2024] Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

12. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12382/2024 Radhy Shyam Kumawat S/o Dhana Ram Kumawat, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 68/150 Near Radhe Bakers Sec.6 Haldi Ghati Gate Pratap Nagar Tonk Road Jaipur Raj. Kirodi Lal Meena S/o Lallu Lal Meena, R/o Vill-Chandwas Post- Hemlyawala Teh. Ram Grah Pachwara Dis. Dausa, Raj.

Prashant Nawal S/o Bhagchand Nawal, R/o Vill. Bhudol Vaya Gagwana Ajmer Raj. Dist- Ajmer Per. R/o Shri Vinayak Pollution Checking Center Ajmer Raj. Pankaj Kumar S/o Sitaram, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Vpo Budaniya Chirawa Dis. Jhunjhunu Raj. Ravi Yadav S/o Jagdish Prasad Yadav, Aged About 27 Years, Dusado Ki Dhani Kaladera Dis. Jaipur Raj. Vatsal Joshi S/o Ram Prakash Joshi, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 3806 Gokul Bhawan Deenanath Ji Ka Rasta Jaipur Raj. Somendra S/o Hawa Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vill. Dhani Hukma Post Makro Jhunjhunu Raj. Pooja Meena D/o Jaodhaj Meena, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 31 Adarsh Nagar Krishna Colony Tonk ,raj. Pushpendra Singh S/o Devi Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vpo Newara Teh. Bhusawar Bharatpur Raj. Pradeep Kumar Meena S/o Amar Singh Meena, Aged About 30 Years, 32A Laxmi Nagar Bhiend Patasa Factory Goner Road Jaipur Raj. Sachin Yadav S/o Vikram Singh Yadav, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Vill. Kheri Charnan Sikar Raj. Himmat Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o A-68 Arawali Nagar Benad Road, Nangal Siras Jaipur Raj.

13. Mohit Saini S/o Jugal Kishor Taksaliya, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Taksaliya Mohalla, Mujere Wali Gali Main Market, Deeg Bharatpur Raj.

16. Narendra Khokhar S/o Lala Ram Khokhar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Vill. Ganeshpura Post Kalakh Teh. Phulera Jaipur Raj. Surendra Singh S/o Kishan Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Gram Sirsya Post Lasadiya Teh. Phagi, Jaipur Raj. Bhanu Sharma S/o Anil Kumar Sharma, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Infront Of Water Works Barlabas Rajgarh, Alwar Raj.

17. Shubham Vyas S/o Ajay Vyas, Aged About 27 Years, R/o [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (5 of 46) [CW-16144/2024] B-42 Vallabh Nagar Sophia School Road, Kota Raj.

19. Deepak Kumar Meena S/o Sanwar Mal Meena, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vill. Bai Ka Bas Post. Kanarpura Teh. Chomu Dis. Jaipur Raj. Hemant Kumar Sain S/o Subhash Chand Sain, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Vill. Ratangarh Post. Pala Teh. Malakhera Alwar Raj. 301406.

20. Mayur Gupta S/o Ashok Gupta, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Punjabi Mevbasti Dantla Alwar Raj.

34. Himmat Singh Chouhan S/o Babu Singh Chouhan, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Vill Catarpura Post Per. R/o Deepak Kumar Sharma S/o Shyam Lal Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Rajaheda Teh. Nadoti Karauli Rishikesh Meena S/o Pyarelal Meena, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Vill. Post Dhanoli Sawaimadhopur Raj. Shubham Verma S/o Ganesh Lal, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Ramdevji K Mandir K Pichee, Nagar Parishad Ki Bundi Dis. Bundi. Raj. Neha Sharma D/o Shyam Sundar Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ward No. 6 Neta Gali, Nansa Gate S.n. Mahila College Ke Pass Dis. Jhunjhunu Raj. Suman Kanwar D/o Rajendra Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Chhinchhas Teh. Laxmangarh Sikar Raj. Satish Verma S/o Modu Lal Verma, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Nagar Parishad Ki Gali Regar Mohalla Baharali Bundi Raj. Anurag Mittal S/o Om Prakash Mittal, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Mittal Bhawan Behind Of Akashwani Gottam Colony Bazariya Sawai Madhopur Raj. 322001. Bajrang Lal Meena S/o Ramrey Meena, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Vill. Lodera Post-Sunara , Teh- Newai Distrct- Tonk State- Rajasthan .pincode. Pushpendra Singh S/o Kamal Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Pushp Vatika Colony Beside Rural Power House Bharatpur Raj. Ajay Kumar Mahamana S/o Brijendra Singh Mahamana, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Near Ranjeet Nagar A Block Daya Nagar Colony 60 Feet Road Alwar Raj. Aakanksha Vyas D/o Ajay Vyas, Aged About 31 Years, R/o B-42 Vallabh Nagar Sophia School Road Kota Raj. Harshit Sharma Sharma S/o Rajendra Prasad Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, R/o P.n. 11 Narayan Vihar 2Nd Behind Pinjarapole Gaushala Tonk Road Sanganer Jaipur Raj. Deepak Sharma S/o Banesh Kumar Sharma, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vill And Post Gidania Teh. Chirawa Jhunjhunu Raj. [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (6 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]

37. Danish Raza S/o Nisar Ahmed Ansari, Aged About 30 Years, Behind Masjid Sheopur Road Village Khatoli Dist. Kota Raj. Hemraj Gurjar S/o Dharmsingh Gurjar, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vill Post Bawanpara Dausa Raj. Harish S/o Manoj Kumar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o 174 Jaato Ka Mohalla Bharunda Khurd Jhunjhunu Raj.

38. Mohan Lal Sharma S/o Nanag Ram Sharma, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Chirara, Post - Khorashyamdass Teh. Amer Voi. Jaitpura Jaipur Raj.

40. Ajay Singh Chauhan S/o Narendra Singh Chauhan, Aged About 36 Years, R/o 1 Ga 4 Kala Kuan Housing Board Alwar Raj. Basant Kumar Sen S/o Sarwan Kumar Sen, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 31 Sunny Nagar Kumbha Marg Pratap Nagar Sanganer Thana Jaipur.

41. Manish Gurjar S/o Jagdish Prasad Gurjar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Bhadang Dhani Bawanpara Bawanpara Dausa Raj. 303326.

51. Kailash Kumawat S/o Kanha Ram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Vill Mannapura Kheri Ram Post Akoda Teh,phulera Jaipur Raj. Rahul Saini S/o Sanwar Mal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No. 01, Mandawa Jhunjhunu Raj. Hemraj Gurjar S/o Kailash Gurjar, Aged About 25 Years, Vill- Kanwarpura Post - Baniyana Teh- Lawan Dausa Raj. Akash Agarwal S/o Sunil Kumar Gupta, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No. 03, Karni Colony Amarsar Road Sikar Raj. Satpal Singh Gurjar S/o Shyoji Lal Gurjar, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Ward No. 09 Village Post Banetha Teh. Uniyara Tonk Raj. Rajesh Kumar Gurjar S/o Balram Gurjar, Aged About 32 Years, Vill Akbarpura , Post Shrimahaveerji Teh - Shree Mahaveerji Dis. Karauli Raj. Hemant Kumar Gupta S/o Brijesh Gupta, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Kalyan Colony Near Bank Of Baroda Bayana Bharatpur Raj. Sandeep Kumar S/o Bhanwar Lal Awana, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vpo - Jakhora The- Chirawa Via- Mandrella Jhunjhunu Raj. Anita Kumari D/o Khyali Ram Gurjar, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vpo- Jakhora Teh- Chirawa Jhunjhunu Raj. Darshna Saraswat D/o Poonam Chand Saraswat, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 17 Gayatri Nagar Ajmer Road Sodala Jaipur Raj. 302006

52. Vipin Kumar Gurjar S/o Kanhaiya Lal Gurjar, R/o Vill. [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (7 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]

56. Kalighati Post- Bilonchi Via- Morija Teh -Amer Jaipur Raj. Kunal Yadav S/o Suresh Kumar Yadav, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Path No.1, Krishna Vihar Colony Renwal Road , Near Power House Chomu Dis. Jaipur Raj. Akshay Kumar Khatri S/o Hira Lal, R/o B-203 Gomti Apartment Sec 18 Pratap Nagar, Sanganer Jaipur. Himmat Kumar Meena S/o Banshi Dhar, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village - Bhagwanpura Post- Cheeplata, Teh- Neem Ka Thana Sikar, Raj. Vaidehi Sharma D/o Shrawan Kumar Sharma, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Vimalpura, Post- Kanarpura, Via Kalader Teh- Chomu Jaipur

57. Mahesh Kumar Sharma S/o Roodmal Sharma, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vimalpura Post- Kanapura, Teh- Chomu Jaipur

59. Vinod Gochar S/o Shyoji Lal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vill. Anantganj Post- Dhowara Teh- Hindoli Bundi Raj Suresh Kumar S/o Girdhari Lal Samota, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Viil. Derawali Dhani Post Jairampura Teh - Srimadhopur Sikar Raj.

60. Manish Sharma S/o Banwari Lal Sharma, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vpo - Jatwara Dhani Girdharwas Teh- Bassi Jaipur Raj.

62. Vipin Gautam S/o Prakash Chand Goutam, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 1-G-12 Mahaveer Nagar Extension , Kota Gurjar Ashok S/o Kailash Ram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Dhabhaiyo Ka Mohalla, Harsolao Near Co-Operative Kota, Hrsolao, Medta City District Nagaur, Presently Residing At 23, Bajiya Pg, Gangaram Nagar, Gopal Pura By Pass Jaipur.

63. Manmohan Singh Gurjar S/o Indraraj Gurjar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Peepalkheda, Mahwa Dausa.

67. Rajesh Kumar Gurjar S/o Bachhu Singh Gurjar, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Basda, Geejgarh Road, Sikandra, District Dausa. Ajay Varma S/o Lachhi Ram Verma, Aged About 29 Years, R/o House Number 280, Ambedkar Colony, Kunhadi Police Station , Kota. Ravinder Singh S/o Ajit Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vill Kherki, Behror, Post- Gunti, District Alwar. Ramavtar Meena S/o Bheema Ram Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Rang Lal Ka Pura Tah- Todabhim, District Karauli. Versus ----Petitioners

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Information Technologies And Communications, [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (8 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]

2. Secretraite, Jaipur. Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministrial Services Selection Board (Rsmssb), Through Its Secretary, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12595/2024 Kundan Swami S/o Sita Ram Swami, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Shiv Colony Med Viratnagar, District Jaipur. Shailendra Kumar S/o Suraj Mal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vill-Murraki Post Didyari Teh-Bayana, District Bharatpur. Monu Jangid D/o Sharwan Kumar Jangir, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Jyoti Nagar, Dhod Road, Sikar. Pukhraj Gurjar S/o Ramji Lal Gurjar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vill- Soonthra Post Soonthra Teh-Uniyara, District -Tonk Balvenendra Kumar S/o Sohanlal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vpo -Channa Teh-Chirawa District-Jhunjhunu. Prerana Sharma D/o Ramavatar Sharma, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vpo-Alisar Via-Kaladera The -Chomu, District- Jaipur. Yogesh Kumar Saini S/o Madan Lal Saini, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vill-Manota Khurd, Post -Khetri Nagar, Teh- Khetri, District Jhunjhunu. Abhay Singh S/o Tej Singh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Gali District Bharatpur, Rajasthan -321642 Pankaj D/o Hetram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Suresh Kumar Raslana, Hanumangarh 335502, Presently Residing At 55/47 Heera Path, Madhyam Marg, Mansarovar, Jaipur. Pankaj Kumar Bairwa S/o Babulal Bairwa, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Vill-Naryanpura Post-Peechupara Kalan, Baswa District Dausa Rajasthan. Jitendra Kumar Meena S/o Rameshwar Prasad Meena, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Dholeta Teh- Nadoti. District Karauli-322213 Versus ----Petitioners State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Information Technologies And Communications, Secretraite, Jaipur. Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministrial Services Selection Borad (Rsmssb), Through Its Secretary, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur - 302018, Rajasthan. ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (9 of 46) [CW-16144/2024] S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13055/2024 Lakshya Jaiman S/o Shri Ram Avtar Sharma, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Behind Madhuvan Hotel, Near Pradhan Paradise, Agra Road, Dausa, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioner

3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Information Technology And Communication, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. Commissioner And Special Secretary, Department Of Information Technology And Communication, It Building, Yojana Bhavan Campus, Tilak Marg, C Scheme, Ashok Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13246/2024 Mukesh Chandra Sharma S/o Ramchandra Sharma, R/o Aashakali Ki Dhani, Vpo Labana, Via Achrol Teh Amer, District Jaipur. ----Respondents Versus ----Petitioner The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Information Technology And Department Communication, Secretariat, Jaipur. Of Commissioner Cum Special Secretary, Department Of Information Technology And Communication, Jaipur. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13614/2024 Vijay Kumar Choudhary S/o Virendra Singh Choudhary, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Bhata Ki Dhani, Village Sudarshanpura, Post Jalsoo, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Dharmendra Mali S/o Shyam Lal Mali, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Maliyo Ki Chouki, Amargarh, District Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. Mukesh S/o Prema Ram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 3/234, Old Housing Board, Pali, District Pali, Rajasthan. Babita Varma D/o Sharawan Kumar Varma, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Chhawani Badi, Jamat, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar, Rajasthan. Asha Dangi D/o Nand Lal Dangi, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Thoor, Tehsil Badgaon, District Udaipur,

5. [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (10 of 46) [CW-16144/2024] Rajasthan.

9. Jimmy Gupta S/o Lokesh Gupta, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Near Bus Stand, Bhartari Colony, Bayana, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. Kailash Kunwar Rathore D/o Bheru Singh Rathore, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Kochala, Post Sultan Ji Ka Kherwara, Tehsil Jhadol, District Udaipur, Rajasthan. Suraj Saini S/o Rampal Saini, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Plot No. 98, Kakuniya Ki Dhani, Boytawala, Benar Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Hanuman Nogiya S/o Bhola Shankar Verma, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Deipol Chungi Naka, Ward No. 12, Nainwa, Bundi, Rajasthan.

10. Abhishek Chouhan S/o Ganga Sagar Chouhan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Chouhan Panchayat Bhawan Ke Pass, District Ajmer, Rajasthan.

11. Manoj Sharma S/o Mangal Chand Sharma, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Radhapura, Post Radhapura, Post Radhakishanpura, Block Jalsoo, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

7. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13655/2024 Narendra Singh Gurjar S/o Sumer Mal Gurjar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vpo Manaksas, Tehsil Udaipurwati, District Neem Ka Thana, Rajasthan. Lokendra Khatana S/o Omprakash Khatana, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Khuntala Ka Bas, Post Khuntala, Tehsil Baswa, District Dausa, Rajasthan. Himani Jain D/o Mahendra Kumar Jain, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ward No. 7, Akshay Jain Sanghi Ji Ke Mandir Ke Pass, Todapole, Nainwan, District Bundi, Rajasthan. Nitesh Shakrawal S/o Ram Kumar Shakrawal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o 93, Shri Kalyan Nagar, Kartarpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Arjun Singh Chouhan S/o Heem Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Vpo Punawali, Tehsil Gogunda, District Udaipur, Rajasthan. Saurabh Joshi S/o Om Prakash Joshi, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Brhampuri, Vpo Kurabad, District Udaipur, Rajasthan. Arpit Vaishnav S/o Girdhari Vaishnav, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 161, Abadi Khas, Bemla, Tehsil Girwa, District Udaipur, Rajasthan. [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (11 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]

11. Megha Sharma D/o Umesh Kumar Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, R/o A-265, In Front Of M.k.b. School, Nehru Nagar, Panipech, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Harshvardhan Singh S/o Hitendra Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o 5/321, Rhb Colony, Goverdhan Vilas, Sector- 14, Udaipur, Rajasthan. Ajay Meena S/o Sitaram Meena, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Plot No. 30, Prabhu Pradhan City, B Block, Jagatpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Amit Kumar S/o Babu Lal Gupta, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Opposite Of Govt. Girls Sr. Secondary School, Ward No. 11, Khairthal, District Alwar, Rajasthan.

12. Manish Kundara S/o Ghanshyam Kundara, Aged About 34 Years, R/o B-220, Mahesh Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

20. Jyoti Purohit D/o Ratan Lal Vyas, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Ii-F/988, Mdv Colony, Bikaner, Rajasthan. Ruchi Gupta D/o Matadeen Gupta, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Physical Road, In Front Of Income Tax Office, Shivpuri, Madhya Pradesh. Satveer Singh S/o Kaan Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o A-41, U.i.t. Quarters, Karni Nagar, Lalgarh, District Bikaner, Rajasthan. Kamlesh Kumar Sharma S/o Laxman Lal Sharma, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 105, Gavalini, Madhogarh Vaya Toonga, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. Somendra Meena S/o Jagdish Prasad Meena, Aged About 24 Years, R/o 226-227, Lajpat Nagar, Teelawala, Jagatpura, Tehsil Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Abhishek Chouhan S/o Ganga Sagar Chouhan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Panchayat Bhawan Ke Pass, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. Pankaj Panwar S/o Ramesh Chand Panwar, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Near Bus Stand, Anta, District Baran, Rajasthan. Vaishali Paliwal D/o Mul Shankar Paliwal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Brahmpuri, Delwara, Nathdwara, District Rajsamand, Rajasthan.

21. Mukesh Chandra Gurjar S/o Kishan Lal Gurjar, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Pari, Tehsil Bhupalsagar, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan.

22. Rajesh Kumar Saini S/o Om Prakash Saini, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Vpo Rampura, Khandela, District Sikar, Rajasthan.

23. Manish Sharma S/o Brij Bihari Sharma, Aged About 33 Years, R/o C-119, Kardhani Scheme, Kalwar Road, Govindpura, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

24. Rahul Choudhary S/o Ram Gopal Choudhary, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 8, Maliyon Ka Mohalla, Jagdamba Colony, [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (12 of 46) [CW-16144/2024] Dher Ke Balaji, Sikar Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

12. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13657/2024 Devnarayan S/o Bholi Singh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Vpo Punchhari, Tehsil Nagar, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. Chandresh Kumar Bachlus S/o Munshi Lal Gupta, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 50, Vijay Nagar, Behind Neb Housing Board, Alwar, Rajasthan. Ruksar Banu D/o Abdul Hameed Bagwan, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Gulab Vatika, Bhankrota, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Sunil Kumawat S/o Sita Ram Kumawat, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Vpo Kajipura, Tehsil Phulera, Sambhar Lake, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Jai Prakash S/o Mangal Chand, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Posani, Tehsil Laxmangarh, Via Kudan, District Sikar, Rajasthan. Lekhraj Sharma S/o Goverdhan Lal Sharma, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Girdharwas Ki Dhani, Jatwara, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. Amit Kumar S/o Ranjeet Kumar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Garhi, Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar, Rajasthan. Sahil Ikbal S/o Suleman Khan, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Gomati Colony, Near Bayana Mod, District Karauli, Rajasthan. Naresh Chauhan S/o Mohan Lal Chauhan, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Padikala, Tehsil And District Banswara, Rajasthan. Sanjay Kumar Sharma S/o Shrawan Kumar Sharma, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ward No. 09, Vpo Dholasari, Tehsil Dantaramgarh, District Sikar, Rajasthan. Shankar Lal Bochalya S/o Banwari Lal Bochalya, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Kanwarpura, Post Itawa, Tehsil Kishangarh Renwal, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. Kalu Ram Saini S/o Kishan Lal Saini, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Niwai Darwaza, Purani Tonk, District Tonk, Rajasthan.

13. Manvendra Upman S/o Roshan Lal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Dhanwara, Tehsil Kumher, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan.

14. Krishna Kumar Singodia S/o Kanhaiya Lal Singodia, Aged [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (13 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]

22. About 33 Years, R/o Near Railway Gate No. 4, Chandbas, Sujangarh, District Churu, Rajasthan. Aakash Dan S/o Narpat Dan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Charanwas, Post Jakhari, Tehsil Raniwara, District Jalore, Rajasthan. Pratik Sarin S/o Dhirender Swaroop Sarin, Aged About 37 Years, R/o 229/1, Mateshwari Bhawan, Church Hall Road, Christian Ganj, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. Vikas Rawat S/o Gopiram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Rawata Wali Dhani, Putti, Kotputli, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Shubham Kumawat S/o Banwari Lal Kumawat, Aged About 24 Years, R/o 68, Govind Nagar, Dcm, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Bhagawati Prasad Malav S/o Banshi Lal Malav, Aged About 36 Years, R/o A-143, Vardhman Nagar, Balita Main Road, Kunhadi, District Kota, Rajasthan. Pravendra Choudhary S/o Vijay Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o 147, Tilak Nagar, Near Heeradas Circle, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. Nishant S/o Govind Singh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Sujalpur, Nagar, Deeg, Rajasthan. Vinay Gautam S/o Suresh Kumar Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 4-J-15, Mahaveer Nagar Iii, Kota, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13678/2024 Himanshu Agarwal S/o Dinesh Kumar Agarwal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Kootooki, Post Shyaluta, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar, Rajasthan. Nitesh Kumar Mahala S/o Kalu Ram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Ward No. 13, Dhani Bhogla Wali, District Sikar, Rajasthan. Ishawer Lal Nanoma S/o Ram Lal Nanoma, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Vpo Garduna, Tehsil Bichhiwara, District Dungarpur, Rajasthan. Roshan Joshi S/o Laxminarayan Joshi, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vpo Kupra, Tehsil And District Banswara, Rajasthan. Kanti Lal Patel S/o Jeevan Lal Patel, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vpo Chhapi, Tehsil Bichhiwara, District Dungarpur, Rajasthan. Shubham Agarwal S/o Jeetmal Agarwal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bhardur Singh Colony, Near Bhardur Singh Ji

6. [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (14 of 46) [CW-16144/2024] Ki Murti, District Churu, Rajasthan.

8. Arvind Kumar S/o Radhakishan Nagar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Dhaturiya, Post Badgaon, Tehsil Anta, District Baran, Rajasthan. Harshvardhan Singh Rao S/o Gopal Singh Rao, Aged About 27 Years, R/o 39, Tulsi Nagar, Chandra Colony, Old Rto Road, Pratap Nagar, Udaipur, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

4. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14072/2024 Prashant Singodiya S/o Prem Singh Singodiya, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Laxmi Chand Suman, Purani Dhani Mandi, Near Shivam Sarvodya School, District Baran, Rajasthan. Lalit Kishor S/o Brijmohan, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Gunjara, Post Kanwas, Tehsil Kanwas, District Kota, Rajasthan. Laxman Swami S/o Ramniwas Swami, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Govind Nagar, Malpura Road, Dudu, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. Roshan Lal Meena S/o Ramkaran Meena, Aged About 29 Years, R/o 16 Tatkaleswar Puri Hida Ki Mori Ramganj Bazar, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14177/2024 Ashish Sahu S/o Raj Bihari Sahu, Aged About 28 Years, R/o 47, Prem Nagar Extension, Riddhi Siddhi Chouraha, Gopalpura Byepass, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Bhawana Kumawat D/o Premprakash Kumawat, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Dwarka Nagar, Lane No. 1, Chorasiya Was Road, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer, Rajasthan. Pramod Kumawat S/o Ram Swaroop Kumawat, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Jai Balaji Furnitures, Opposite Barala Marriage Garden, Ward No. 15, Indra Colony, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Shubhangi Patodiya D/o Ram Ratan Patodiya, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Shri Balaji Garments, New Market City,

4. [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (15 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]

9. Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. Karmaveer Singh S/o Badri Lal Gehlot, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Bhawani Chowk, Barli Sadri, Tehsil Desuri, District Pali, Rajasthan. Vishal Ramawat S/o Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Shri Ram Kutir, Khara Kua School, Rajendra Colony, Jalore, Rajasthan. Laxmi Bohra D/o Umed Singh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ward No. 02, Sri Vijay Nagar, District Sriganganagar, Rajasthan. Jyotsna Tolambiya D/o Mangi Lal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 11/34, Tolambiya Sadan, Kumbha Road, Sector A, Azad Nagar, Bhilwara, Rajasthan. Priya Kumawat D/o Jairam Kumawat, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Kumawato Ka Mohalla, Manoharpur, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondent

3. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14372/2024 Shakti Singh Shekhawat S/o Jaidev Singh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 3, Narayan Vihar-A, Opposite Hukmaram Nagar, Saini Marg, Harnathpura, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Rajeev Kumar Goyal S/o Mahaveer Prasad Goyal, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Plot No. 1, Gali No. 3, Haud, Bari, District Dholpur, Rajasthan. Laxman Puri Goswami S/o Shiv Puri Goswami, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Near Dharam Raj Temple, Bhuwana, Udaipur, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14723/2024

2. Sunita Sharma D/o Jagdish Sharma, Aged About 37 Years, R/o B-4, Shree Ram Nagar, Jaipura, Jagatpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Kamal Pareek S/o Puran Mal Sharma, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ward No. 14, Rawatsar, Ward No. 14, Near Khetrapal Mandir, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan. [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (16 of 46) [CW-16144/2024] Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

6. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15431/2024 Ashok Kumar Yadav S/o Ramsingh Yadav, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Vpo Khohari, Tehsil Bansur, District Alwar, Rajasthan. Deepak Yadav S/o Prakash Chand Yadav, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Kharab Narheda, Kotputli, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Rohit Dayal S/o Shiv Dayal Dhaker, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Main Road, Tehsil Bijoiya, Post Tharoda, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan. Suresh Kumar S/o Mahendra Kumar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Ward No. 02, Bhagwan Deidas, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan. Mohit Raj Saini S/o Lal Chand Saini, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Badi Dhani, Post Thoi, Tehsil Srimadhopur, District Sikar, Rajasthan. Rakesh Bishnoi S/o Om Prakash, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Khilery Fataniyon Ki Dhani, Thata Nagar, Bhajan Nagar, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

5. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15699/2024 Mamta Meena D/o Haari Narayan Meena, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Plot No. 36, Parshvnath Nagar, Near Airport Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Dipanshu Samaria S/o Bhanwar Lal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Sector-8, In Front Of Bus Depot, Near Pratap Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Namichand Mourya S/o Ganpat Lal Mourya, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 356, Kishan Marg, Naya Khera, Ambabadi, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Yogesh Upadhyay S/o Santosh Kumar, Aged About 29 Years, R/o F-141, Mdv Colony, Bikaner, Rajasthan. Adish Gautam S/o Chandrashekhar Sharma, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Sunaro Ka Mohalla, Chechat, District Kota, Rajasthan. [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (17 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]

12. Hemant Katrawat S/o Lakhan Lal Meena, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 33 Prem Nagar, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Udai Singh Sisodiya S/o Gordhan Singh Sisodiya, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Krishi Mandi Ke Samne, Kalyanpura, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. Dilip Kumar Koli S/o Amba Lal Koli, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Adarsh Nagar, Gali No. 8, Kota Road, Bhilwara, Dausa, Rajasthan Rakesh Sharma S/o Ramesh Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 383, Keshav Nagar, Somnath Nagar, Agra Road, Dausa, Rajasthan. Indraj Meena S/o Narayan Meena, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Bhat Ka Bas, Post Raisar, Tehsil Andhi District Jaipur, Rajasthan. Swetha D/o Khuma Ram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Salwa Kalan, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. Vinita Arora D/o Ram Ratan Arora, Aged About 33 Years, R/o A-7, Marwar Nagar, Behind Railway Station, Mahamandir, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

13. Mangi Lal S/o Gopi Kishan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Newari, Tehsil Pachpadra, Kalyanpura, District Barmer, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15830/2024 Bhavna Sharma D/o Late Shri Indra Prakash Sharma, Aged About 33 Years, R/o A-408 Anand Lok 1St Gajadharpura Road, Kalwar, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. Pankaj Modi S/o Ved Prakash Modi, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Opp. 42, Adarsh Colony, Daudpur, Alwar, Rajasthan. Ankit Singh S/o Ramesh Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o A-6, Deoli Arab Road, Pragati Nagar, Borkhera, Kota, Rajasthan. Ashish Khandelwal S/o Satya Narayan Khandelwal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o 3 By 3, Ganesh Talab, Dadabari, Kota, Rajasthan. Kapil Nagar S/o Shankar Lal Nagar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Pipliya Jagir, Post Khopar, Tehsil Chhabra, District Baran, Rajasthan. Varsha Pathak D/o Ghanshyam Pathak, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 437 E, R.k. Puram, Kota, Rajasthan.

7. Ayush Sharma S/o Shiv Kumar Sharma, Aged About 27 [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (18 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]

9. Years, R/o B-35, Sharma Bhawan, Gurjar Ghati, Amer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Jeetendra Kumar Meena S/o Sultan Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Nawalpura, Post Pathena, Tehsil Bhusawar, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. Ajay Kumar Meena S/o Ghanshyam Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Vpo Nangal Sherpur, Tehsil Todabhim, District Karauli, Rajasthan.

10. Manmohan Suman S/o Mukut Bihari Suman, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Vpo Deoli, Via Kaithoon, Tehsil Kanwas, District Kota, Rajasthan.

12. Bhanwar Lal S/o Radha Kishan, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 122, Utharadha Bas, Palot, District Nagaur, Rajasthan. Harinder Singh S/o Rameshwar Lal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Fatehpur, Sihot Bari, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

2. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15885/2024 Tanuj Mittal S/o Sanjay Kumar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Nen Mandi In Front Of Patrol Pump, Station Road, Hindaun City. Amit Kumar Meena S/o Ramswaroop Meena, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Vpo Gumanpura The Sikrai District Dausa. Abhishek Yadav S/o Radhyshyam Yadav, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Vpo Khedi Milk Via Kishangarh Renwal Teh Kishangarh Renwal, District Jaipur. Manmohan Sharma S/o Kailash Chand Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Shri Govindpura Post Banasthali Vidyapeeth, Tahsil-Niwai District Tonk. Versus ----Petitioners State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Information Technologies And Communications, Secretariat, Jaipur. Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministerial Services Selection Board (Rsmssb), Through Its Secretary, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur- 302018, Rajasthan. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15946/2024

1. Gajendra Sharma S/o Gopal Lal Sharma, Aged About 34 [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (19 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]

9. Years, R/o 79, Anand Vihar-B, Dadi Ka Phatak, Benar Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Vijay Sharma S/o Hari Prasad Sharma, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Gurjar Mohalla, Tonk Road, Kherda, Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. Suresh Kumar S/o Hemraj, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Near Sbs Library, Karanpur, Post Srikaranpur, District Sriganganagar, Rajasthan. Manoj Kumar S/o Ratan Lal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Narsara, Tehsil Fatehpur Bathod, Sikar, Rajasthan. Saead Khan S/o Ayyub Khan, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Nana Chok, Chawand, Tehsil Sarada, District Udaipur, Rajasthan. Balwant Singh S/o Inder Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Ward No. 11, 10 Slw, Silwala Khurd, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan. Rakesh Kumar Sharma S/o Shimbhu Dayal Sharma, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Sabalpura, Post Dola Ka Bass, Via Kaladera, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. Mani Lal Damor S/o Dungar Lal Damor, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village Annapura, Post Charwara, Block Jhonthari, Tehsil Jhonthari, District Dungarpur, Rajasthan. Dinesh Yadav S/o Kanhaiya Lal Yadav, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Mundgasa, Post Rc Khera, Tehsil Hindoli, District Bundi, Rajasthan.

10. Mamta Meena D/o Sitaram Meena, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 6/307, Krishna Marg, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

14. Vishvajeet Singh S/o Prathvi Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o 51, Surya Colony, Near Emmanuel Mission School, Naya Gaon Road, Pali, District Pali, Rajasthan. Kishan Lal S/o Girdhari Lal Mali, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Maliyon Ka Bas, Bap, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan. Pawan Verma S/o Prabhulal Verma, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ward No. Ward No. 13, Lal Bai Mohalla, Vpo Mangrol, District Baran, Rajasthan. Priya Vedi Verma D/o Shimbhu Dayal Vedi, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Anshul Villa B-2 -59 Sudarshan Nagar Pawanpuri, District Bikaner Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16037/2024

1. Saurabh Sharma S/o Premi Sharma, Aged About 29 ----Respondent [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (20 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]

9. Years, R/o Surjeet Nagar, Nursery Road, Near Shani Dev Mandir, District Dholpur, Rajasthan. Pooja Gaur D/o Dal Chand Gaur, Aged About 33 Years, R/o 251, Chand Bihari Nagar, Khatipura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Neha Agrawal D/o Rajendra Kumar Agrawal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o E-13, Rps Colony, Gumanpura, Near Kishorepura, District Kota, Rajasthan. Saorav Dadhich S/o Bajrang Lal Dadhich, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Behind Nsp College, Inside Jassusar Gate, District Bikaner, Rajasthan. Saurabh Beniwal S/o Bhagirath Beniwal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Ward No. 13, Village Sikrori, Barani, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan. Vaibhav Kumar Meena S/o Chuttan Lal Meena, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Udai Mode, Hindaun Road, Behind Central Bank Of India, District Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. Jagdeesh Meghwal S/o Punam Chand Meghwal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No. 8, Kheechiya, Bikaner, Rajasthan. Meenu Kanwar Shekhawat D/o Mool Singh Shekhawat, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Ward No. 23, Churu, District Churu, Rajasthan. Ankita Jangid D/o Mahaveer Prasad Jangid, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Aadarsh Colony, Behind Bhagirath Hostel, Near Modi College, Sikar, Rajasthan.

11. Jitendra Kumar Khemani S/o Bhagwandas Khemani, Aged About 41 Years, R/o 1165/25, Isaia Mohalla, Dayanand Colony, Ajmer, Rajasthan. Suresh Kumar Jangu S/o Ram Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vpo Bhainsawa, Tehsil Kishangarh Renwal, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16043/2024

3. Vishnu Sharma S/o Mahesh Chand Sharma, Aged About 30 Years, R/o A-51, Balaji Vihar-16, Badh Shyopur, Ashawala, Vatika Road, Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Idris Khan S/o Bashir Khan, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Mohammedpura, Nagaur, Rajasthan. Seema Choudhary D/o Ram Chandra Choudhary, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Plot No. 53, Brij Mandal Colony, 100 [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (21 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]

9. Feet Road, Kalwar Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Shivang Sharma S/o Jainath Sharma, Aged About 23 Years, R/o 629, Mahaveer Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Pankaj Kumar Bairwa S/o Babu Lal Bairwa, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Narayanpura, Post Peechupara Kalan, Dausa, Rajasthan. Pawan Kumar Bairwa S/o Bhoma Ram Bairwa, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Plot No. A-19, Gayatri Nagar, Agra Road, Dausa, Rajasthan. Anand Singh Gurjar S/o Amar Singh Gurjar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Opposite Bharat Petrol Pump, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur Road, Bikaner, Rajasthan. Ravishankar Ankodiya S/o Murari Lal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vpo Amargarh, Tehsil Sapotara, District Karauli, Rajasthan. Vishvendra Singh S/o Ratipal Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Shakti Vihar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

10. Priyanka Jain D/o Lalit Jain, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Plot No. 1, Hanuman City B, R.k. Puram, Sitapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16278/2024 Chetan Jaiman S/o Gajanand Jaiman, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Jain Mandir Mohalla, Mojpur, Po Mauj Pur, Distt. Alwar, Rajasthan- 321633 Versus ----Petitioner

2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Chairman, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16406/2024 Vikas Sharma S/o Rajesh Sharma, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 90B Anand Vihar A Benad Road, Dadi Ka Pahtak, Jhotwara, District Jaipur. ----Respondents Versus ----Petitioner [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (22 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]

2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Information Technologies And Communications, Secretariat, Jaipur. Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministerial Services Selection Board (Rsmssb), Through Its Secretary, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur- 302018, Rajasthan. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16479/2024 Harjeet Singh Vijaywal S/o Shri Yadram Vijaywal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Basant Vihar Colony, Riico Road, Sector No. 2, Bharatpur (Raj.)

5. Versus ----Petitioner State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Rajya Krishi Prabandh Sansthan Parisar, Durgapura, Jaipur Rajasthan. President, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Rajya Krishi Prabandh Sansthan Parisar, Durgapura, Jaipur Rajasthan. (Administration) Of And Commissioner, Secretary Department Information Technology And Communication, I.t. Bhawan, Yojna Bhawan Champus, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16482/2024 Arjun Bhatia S/o Sohan Lal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o 21 A Paschim Vihar, Keshopura, Bhankrota, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. Nitin Sharma S/o Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 25 Years, R/o A-08, Pratap Colony, Somnath Nagar, District, Dausa Rajasthan. Aman Sharma S/o Manmohan Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Behind Nagar Dharmshala, Tripoliya Road, Custom Choraha, Pandit Rameshwar Joshi Ke Samne, District Banswara, Rajasthan. Manish Sutrakar S/o Sitaram Sutrakar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o 43 Vrindavan Vihar, Mukundpura Road, Bhankrota, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. Sanjay Kumawat S/o Pappu Lal Kumawat, Aged About 29 Years, R/o B-96/29, Bai Ji Ki Kothi, Jhalana Doongari, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (23 of 46) [CW-16144/2024] Rajasthan.

6. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16483/2024 Suresh Kumar Meena S/o Bhagwan Sahai, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Dhani Pipli Wali, Vpo Khanwas, Tehsil Lawan, District Dausa, Rajasthan. Seema Meena D/o Ganga Sahay Meena, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Vpo Seedra, Tehsil Newai, District Tonk, Rajasthan. Anjali Garg D/o Manoj Garg, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 123, Ward No. 24, Naya Bazar, Gangapurcity, District Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. Sonali Khandelwal D/o Hanuman Sahay Khandelwal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Plot No. 8, Suraj Nagar, Behind Kediya House, Nadi Ka Phatak, Murlipura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Chhabi Natani D/o Kamal Babu Natani, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Ward No. 12, Munim Para, Purani Nagar Palika Ke Pass, Gangapurcity, Rajasthan. Vikas Sharma S/o Rajesh Sharma, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 90 B, Anand Vihar-A, Dadi Ka Phatak, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16509/2024 Kapil Dattatrey S/o Devi Sahay Dattatrey, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Dattatrey Chauraha, Jhareda Road, Hindaun City, District Karauli, Rajasthan 322230. Versus ----Petitioner Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16546/2024

2. Hitesh Kumar Sharma S/o Ramesh Chand Sharma, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Papri, Post Sothana, Tehsil Viratnagar, District Jaipur. Rehana Bano W/o Abdul Sakur, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Ward No. 36, Mohalla Chejaran Char Kutub Masjid Ke Pass, Jhunjhunu.

3. Rajesh Kumar Meena S/o Gendi Lal Meena, Aged About [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (24 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]

5. 30 Years, R/o Village Rampura Post Boroda, Tehsil Dausa. Versus ----Petitioners State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Information Technologies And Communications, Secretraite, Jaipur. Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministerial Services Selection Board (Rsmssb), Through Its Secretary, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur- 302018, Rajasthan. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17350/2024 Premraj Mehara S/o Jagdish Narayan Mehara, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Vpo Devgaon, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. Vishanu Singh S/o Mahendra Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Vpo Pilod, Tehsil Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. Sonam D/o Daleep Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Shri Krishan Nagar, Mundawar, District Alwar, Rajasthan. Dharemendra Kumar S/o Ram Pratap, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Vpo Kolsiya, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. Narendra Yogi S/o Gopal Lal Yogi, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Yogi Bhawan, Bus Stand, Sirsi, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

4. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17380/2024 Dharmpal Saini S/o Nanchu Ram Saini, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Nopla Ki Dhani, Tehsil Bansur, District Alwar, Rajasthan. Deepak Gupta S/o Bhagwan Gupta, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Vpo Rasgan, Tehsil Mundawar, District Alwar, Rajasthan. Priyanka Kumari D/o Mahipal Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ward No. 01, Poddar Pavelian Ke Samne, Station Road, Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. Vikram Singh S/o Durjan Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Biramsar, Tehsil Ratangarh, District Churu, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (25 of 46) [CW-16144/2024] Versus Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondent

3. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17405/2024 Sachin Dara S/o Zile Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Vpo Kishorpura, Tehsil Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. Devaram Jangid S/o Ramswaroop Jangid, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Bhankrota Khurd, Post Ajairajpura, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. Shubham Agrawal S/o Rajendra Kumar Agrawal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o 15, Behind Navjivan Hospital, Hanuman Vatika, Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17701/2024 Tejpal Choudhary S/o Rampal Choudhary, R/o Ward No. 08, Ramjipura Khurd, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioner The Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

5. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17747/2024 Ramavtar Meena S/o Bheema Ram Meena, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Rang Lal Ka Pura, Tehsil Todabhim, District Karauli, Rajasthan. Suresh Kumar Meena S/o Mangal Chand Meena, Aged About 34 Years, R/o P.no. 50, Shri Nath Vihar-I, Uparli Dhani, Agra Road, Jamdoli, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. Ravindra Pareek S/o Om Prakash Pareek, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Main Bazar Ke Pass, Vpo Nokha, Chandawata, Tehsil Merta, District Nagaur, Rajasthan. Manish Baira S/o Nanda Ram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Ramsari, Tehsil Degana, District Nagaur, Rajasthan. Mayank Pareek S/o Ramdev Pareek, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Krashi Mandi Road, Tankipura, Degana Junction, District Nagaur, Rajasthan [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (26 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]

8. Suresh Kumar S/o Lal Chand, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Devasar, Post Mehrasar Upadhiyan, Via Sahwa, Tehsil Sardarshahar, District Churu, Rajasthan. Hitesh Sharma S/o Vishwambhar Dayal Sharma, Aged About 29 Years, R/o 209-C, Nemi Sagar Colony, Vaishali Marg, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Pankaj Kumar Gupta S/o Naresh Gupta, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Gupta Krishi Yantralaya, Subhash Chowk, Bayana, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondent

3. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17757/2024 Surendra Jakhar S/o Ganpat Ram Jakhar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Bharkasli, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar, Rajasthan. Saroj Kudi D/o Muknda Ram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Rambaxpura, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar, Rajasthan. Nikhil Sharma S/o Girdhari Lal Sharma, Aged About 27 Years, R/o 2/24, Housing Board, Jawahar Nagar, Bharatpur Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18103/2024

2. Harish Charan S/o Narayan Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Gadhwara, Tehsil Rohat, District Pali, Rajasthan. Mahesh Bhati S/o Jeetmal Bhati, Aged About 31 Years, R/o House No. 91, Somana Marg, Vpo Rol, Tehsil Jayal, District Nagaur, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18615/2024

1. Shiv Prakash Khangar S/o Shankar Lal Khangar, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Near Of Sr. Secondary School, Ward [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (27 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]

13. No. 9, Tehsil Uniyara, District Tonk, Rajasthan. Gagan Kumar S/o Rajesh Kumar, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 157, Main Road, In Front Of Pnb Bank, Vpo Tatarpur, District Alwar, Rajasthan. Jyoti Yadav D/o Karmveer Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vpo Gunti, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. Sourav Parmar S/o Kana Ram Parmar, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Ramdev Colony, Jalore, District Jalore, Rajasthan. Kaushal Kumar Regar S/o Ramesh Chandra Regar, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Ambedkar Marg, Regar Mohalla, Insite Surajpole, District Udaipur, Rajasthan. Mahesh Kumar Khatik S/o Ram Gopal Khatik, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Khatiko Ka Mohalla, Nangal Mode, Kunda, Amer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. Devershi Mehta S/o Navneet Mehta, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 7, Laxmi Narayan Nagar, Savina, District Udaipur, Rajasthan. Abhishek Swami S/o Parmeshwar Swami, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Behind Old Power House, Aguna Chowk, District Bikaner, Rajasthan. Shiv Shanker Baria S/o Sharwan Kumar Baria, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Near Songiri Well, Dhobi Mohalla, District Bikaner, Rajasthan. Teerth Narayan Verma S/o Keshar Lal Verma, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Plot No. 41, Shree Ram Nagar Colony, Sanganer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. Sudesh Kumar Gothwal S/o Jaswant Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ambedkar Nagar, Behind Khatiko Ki Dharmsala, Vpo Behror, District Alwar, Rajasthan. Sanjay S/o Satyanarayan, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Arihant Resort, Dudu Road, Brijlal Nagar, Malpura, District Tonk, Rajasthan. Sanket Vaishnav S/o Charan Das Vaishnav, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Kansaro Ka Vas, Near Hanuman Mandir, District Barmer, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 145/2025

1. Rohitash Kumar S/o Bajrang Lal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Jejusar, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (28 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]

3. Shubham Aeron S/o Kailash Chand Gupta, Aged About 29 Years, R/o A-24, Tirupati Nagar, Near Bus Stand, District Karauli, Rajasthan. Rinku Bairwa S/o Ram Gopal Bairwa, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Vyaso Ka Nohra, Post Kojwada, Tehsil Ramgarh Pachwara, Dausa, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

8. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1373/2025 Bhoopender Singh Gurjar S/o Siya Ram Gurjar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vpo Kemari Pul Ki Dhani, Tehsil Nadoti, District Karauli, Rajasthan. Rajpal S/o Narsi Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Tesgaon, Tehsil Nadoti, District Karauli, Rajasthan. Bhagya Singh S/o Padam Singh Gurjar, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Kemari, Tehsil Nadoti, District Karauli, Rajasthan. Bhooshan Kumar Sharma S/o Shyam Bihari Sharma, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ratawali, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Alwar, Rajasthan. Rakesh Bishnoi S/o Jisukh Ram Bishnoi, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Near Old Rto Office, Rathkhana Colony, Bikaner, Rajasthan. Lokesh Badra S/o Meghraj Badra, Aged About 28 Years, R/o 9E96 D, Indra Gandhi Nagar, Jagtpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Ganesh Ram S/o Mangla Ram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Nanana, Post Jabdi Nagar, Tehsil Nawa City, Nagour, District Nagaur, Rajasthan. Somesh Kumar Meena S/o Laxmi Narayan Meena, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Godh Walo Ki Dhani, Khora Meena, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1409/2025

1. Leela Choyal D/o Bhanwar Lal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Bera Kudiya Jetawas Road, Bilara District Jodhpur (Raj.)

2. Anup Prakash S/o Shri Ram Lal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (29 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]

5. Uppwe Bhaktiyana, Pauri Road, Near Gb Pant Office, Srinagar Garhwal, District Pauri Garhwal, Uttarakhand. Udaram S/o Lekhram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Ward No. 3, Suratgarh, District Sri Ganganagar (Raj.) Hanumana Ram S/o Shri Panna Ram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Rampura Purava, Tehsil Dhorimanna, District Barmer (Raj.) Manoj Dadhich S/o Shri Harish Chandra Dadhich, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Swami Mohalla, Naya Sahar, District Bikaner (Raj.) Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaiuur, Rajasthan. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1606/2025 Mayank Kumar Yadav S/o Kaushik Kumar Yadav, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Narayan Bhavan Bus Stand, Jhalawar, Jhalawar, Rajasthan

4. Versus ----Petitioner State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Information Technology And Communication, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. Commissioner And Special Secretary, Department Of Information Technology And Communication, It Building, Yojana Bhavan Campus, Tilak Marg, C Scheme, Ashok Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1790/2025 Sajan Singh Panwar S/o Dinesh Singh Panwar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vpo Mukta Prasad Colony, District- Bikaner, Rajasthan. Kailash Kumar Suthar S/o Om Prakash Suthar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vpo Vishwakarma Colony, Gopeshwar Basti, Bikaner, Rajasthan. Sandeep Tak S/o Hazari Mal Tak, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Vpo Chambika Thanda, District- Jodhpur, Rajasthan. Neeraj Kumar Gupta S/o Madan Mohan Gupta, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Vpo Bandariya Ke Balaji, Gangapur City, Swaimadhopur, Rajasthan.

5. Sagar Mal Poonia S/o Kalyan Mal Poonia, Aged About 33 [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (30 of 46) [CW-16144/2024] Years, R/o Vpo Harsoli, Via-K Renwal, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondent

4. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1908/2025 Ramkesh Meena S/o Pratap Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Vpo Samel, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan. Preeti D/o Surender Kumar, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Rooppura Kuloth, Khurdh, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. Pankaj Kumar S/o Mahaveer Prasad, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Ghassu Ka Bas, Post Ghassu, Laxmangarh, Sikar, Rajasthan. Parakram Singh Rathore S/o Mahaveer Singh Rathore, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Plot No. 10, Marg No. A-12, Kailash Nagar, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

6. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2078/2025 Sunil Kumar Meena S/o Hansraj Meena, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Chainpura, Post Galad Kalan, Tehsil Bonli, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan (Roll No. 176393). Pankaj Kumar Nagar S/o Ramdhan Lal Nagar, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Plot No. 119, Puran Vihar Colony, Boyatawala, Behind Railway Station, Opposite Benar Phatak, Jaipur, Rajasthan (Roll No. 174890) Jugal Tanwar S/o Premraj Tanwar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Tausar Nagaur, Bhitiyanisar Bass, Tausar Nagaur, District Nagaur, Rajasthan (Roll No. 209428) Tarun Mina S/o Shankar Lal Mina, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Vpo Jatwara, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur, Rajasthan (Roll No. 131394) Rajani Kumari Sameriya D/o Kailash Chand, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Indra Gandhi Nagar, Dcm, District Kota, Rajasthan (Roll No. 215462) Neetesh Kumar S/o Shriniwas Goswami, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 117/292, Mansarovar, Sector 17, Jhalana Chhod, Mansarovar, Jaipur, District Jaipur, Rajasthan (Roll No. 112770) [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (31 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]

7. Yogesh Prajapat S/o Bhanwarlal Prajapat, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 313, Yadav Mohalla, Bus Stand, Delwara, Rajsamand, Rajasthan (Roll No. 228916) Versus ----Petitioners Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

2. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5417/2025 Neeraj Kumar Joshi S/o Pratap Singh Joshi, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 57, Tehsil Road Maniya, District Dhilpur, Rajasthan-328024 Neetesh Babu S/o Heeralal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Sunder Colony, Infront Of Midway Hotel, Sector No. 3, Gt Road, District Dholpur, Rajasthan-328001. Manu Kumar Sharma S/o Vishnu Kumar Sharma, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village And Post Sahroli, Tehsil Saipau, District Dholpur, Rajasthan-328027. Kailash Chand Regar S/o Mohanlal Regar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Flat No. 302 Plot No. 90, Shanti Nagar, Nirmaan Nagar, Jaipur 302019. Versus ----Petitioners The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Information Technolony And Communication, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. Of The Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Aamir Khan Dr. T.N. Sharma Mr. Ashwinee Kumar Jaiman Mr. Raghu Nandan Sharma Mr. Shivatma Kumar Tank Mr. Amitabh Jatav Ms. Aradhna Swami Mr. Akshay Singh Mr. Chain Singh Rathore, Mr. Akshay Sharma Mr. Harendra Neel For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Prasad, Advocate General assisted by Ms. Dhriti Laddha, Mr. Tanay Goyal [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (32 of 46) [CW-16144/2024] Mr. Yuvraj Samant, Ms. Neha Amola Mr. Tilak Vaid Mr. Sandeep Maheshwari Mr. Hansraj Kuldeep, AGC Mr. P.C. Dewanda, Mr. Ajay Poonia Mr. Aditya Sharma for Mr. Sandeep Taneja, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Judgment 03/07/2025

1. This batch of writ petitions pertains to direct recruitment on the post of Informatics Assistant, 2023.

2. Under the advertisement dated 16.01.2023, 2730 posts were advertised, which were increased vide amended advertisement dated 27.06.2024 and total 3415 posts of Informatics Assistant through advertisement dated 16.01.2023 and amended advertisement dated 27.06.2024 were notified by the Rajasthan Subordinate and Ministerial Service Selection Board (RSMSSB) (hereinafter referred to as “the Board”).

3. The written examination was conducted by the Board on

21.01.2024. The written examination is of 100 marks comprising one question paper containing 150 objective type questions.

4. Preliminary answer key was published by the Board on

02.02.2024, then Board invited objections from the candidates during the period 05.02.2024 to 07.02.2024 vide Public Notice dated 02.02.2024.

5. On behalf of respondent-Board, reply to the writ petition has been filed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16144/2024 and with the [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (33 of 46) [CW-16144/2024] consent of counsel for respondents, same reply is treated as a standard reply to all writ petitions. As per reply to the writ petition, filed by the Board, as many as against 89 questions, objections were submitted by the candidates. Objections were sent to the Subject Experts, who thoroughly examined the objections and considered with the help of authorized and standard text books and other material available on various websites. In furtherance to the report of Expert Committee, out of 89 questions, answers of 80 questions, as indicated in the preliminary answer key, were affirmed; answer of two questions including (Question No. 125) were changed and seven questions were deleted. Thereafter, final answer key was published on 01.07.2024 and on the same day, final result was also declared.

6. It is noteworthy that although initially in the writ petitions, answers of various questions were disputed, however, during course of arguments, counsel for petitioners have confined to the answers of only five questions, referred hereinbelow bearing Questions No.12, 50, 89, 125 & 127 and a joint prayer has been made from the side of petitioners that a fresh Committee of Subject Experts be constituted in order to revisit the correctness of the answers of such five questions under consideration and as per the report of Expert Committee, the final result of present competitive examination be revised accordingly.

7. Since counsel for both parties admit that answers in respect of only five questions bearing No. 12, 50, 89, 125 and 127 is under challenge, hence, with the consent of counsel for both [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (34 of 46) [CW-16144/2024] parties, all the writ petitions have been heard together and would stand decided by this common order.

8. Heard counsel for both parties and perused the pleadings so also the other material placed on record.

9. It is noteworthy that out of five questions, answer of one question No.125 in the final answer key has been changed whereas the answers of question Nos. 12, 50, 89 and 127 are same, as was indicated in the preliminary answer key. The tabulation thereof is as under:- S.No. Question No. Preliminary Answer Key dated 02.02.2024 Final Answer Key dated 01.07.2024 Status

5. 12 50 89 125 127 C A A C B C A A B B Unchanged Unchanged Unchanged Changed Unchanged

10. The five questions from the question paper, as placed on record in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16144/2024, are being reproduced hereunder:- “12. LCD Panels or flat panel display uses the property of __. pad? (A) Fiter (B) Thickness (C) Light (D) Size (E) Question not attempted

50. Which of the following is used while working on Touch (A) Finger (B) Pencil (C) Stylus (D) Gloves (E) Questions not attempted [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (35 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]

89. In a Word document, Simrat has to display the list of online sites which can further be used by a student for preparing a research paper on, “The Effect of Social Media on behaviour of Students.” Which feature of the word is the best suitable to prepare the list? (A) Linking (B) Bullets (C) Numbering (D) Graph (E) Question not attempted

125. I am a Memory device. I am composed of transistors and capacitors. I am able to access the data fast. Who am I? (A) Dynamic ROM (B) Static RAM (C) Dynamic RAM (D) Static ROM (E) Question not attempted

127. While transmission of data from a sender to receiver using Modern on Internet, the data is first converted to ____ from ____. (A) Analog, Analog (B) Analog, Digital (C) Digital, Analog (D) Digital, Digital (E) Question not attempted”

11. Counsel for petitioners have relied upon the relevant pages from the book of Board of Secondary Education and NCERT, book of Fundamentals of Computers written by E Balagurusamy Member of UPSC, material from Google research, text book of Class IX under subject Information and Communication Technology as also few of the replies to the disputed questions sent by IITs, NITs and other institutions, in order to suggest that answers in respect of above five questions, which have been finalized by the Board in the final answer key, are incorrect and do not match with the standard text books and other material, hence, such questions be referred to a fresh Committee of expert to re- consider the final answer and as per the Report of Expert Committee, the final result may be revisited/revised. The main [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (36 of 46) [CW-16144/2024] thrust of argument is in respect of change of answer of Question No. 125 from (C) to (B) in the final answer key.

12. Reliance has been placed by counsel for petitioners to the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Vanshika Yadav Vs. Union of India [(2024) 10 SCC 641] decided on

23.07.2024 and the judgment passed by the Rajasthan High Court at Jaipur in case of Ramdhan Kumawat Vs. The State of Rajasthan S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10622/2014 decided on 18.11.2014.

13. Learned Advocate General assisted by Advocate Mr. Yuvraj Samant has vehemently repelled the submissions made by counsel for petitioners and it has been argued that the answer of Question No.125 has been changed, following the Report of Subject Experts. The answers of remaining four questions as indicated in the final answer key are also outcome of the Report of Subject Experts. It has been pointed out that Subject Experts have considered the authentic material and after analyzing the objections thoroughly, have framed their opinion to sustain the answers of questions No.12, 50, 89 and 127 while suggested answer No. (B) as correct answer to the question No. 125. Further, it has been argued that there is no allegation of arbitrariness, biasness or malafides against the Subject Experts or against Board, hence, the prayer to form a new Committee of Subject Experts is hypothetical and without any basis as much as unwarranted in the facts of the present cases.

14. In addition to above, it has been argued that the respondents have completed the recruitment process including the written examination and typing test in a transparent and fair [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (37 of 46) [CW-16144/2024] manner and due procedure was followed by inviting the objections against the preliminary answer key. Thereafter, the objections submitted by the candidates have been considered by the Committee of Subject Experts and subsequently, only the final answer key and the final result of the present recruitment have been declared.

15. It has been argued that the scope of judicial review, in matters relating to challenge to the answers of academic questions asked in the public examination, is extremely limited and very very narrow, which ordinarily may not be exercised by the High Court while exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, unless and until a clear case of apparent error on the face value of the final answer of a questionable question is made out, that too without applying any inferential process of reasoning or by applying the process of rationalization. In support of submission, oft-quoted and landmark judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court have been relied upon and referred:- (i) Ran Vijay Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. [(2018) 2 SCC 357] (ii) Vikesh Kumar Gupta and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan (iii) and Ors. [(2021) 2 SCC 309] Judgment dated 25.08.2023 delivered in Surjan Lal Dhawan and Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4777/2021, which has been affirmed by the Division Bench in Sanjay Kumar Bhaskar Vs. The State of Rajasthan : D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 636/2024 vie order dated 17.03.2025.

16. Heard. Considered.

17. Having considered the rival submissions and obtaining guidance from the case laws referred by respective counsels, this [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (38 of 46) [CW-16144/2024] Court finds that it is not in dispute that after declaration of preliminary answer key by the respondent-Board on 02.02.2024, as per prescribed procedure, objections against the answers suggested in the preliminary answer key to 150 questions, were invited by the Board vide Press Note dated 02.02.2024. The window period to submit objections by the candidates from

05.02.2024 to 07.02.2024 was provided. Thereafter, the objections, which were received by the Board, were sent to the Subject Experts for consideration and as per the report of the Subject Experts, the answer of question No. 125 was changed from (C) to (B) whereas the answers of other questions No.12, 50, 89 & 127 were kept unchanged in the final answer key dated

01.07.2024.

18. This Court finds that the counsel for petitioners have referred and relied upon few of the text books and replies by institutions, referred in Para No.8, before this Court to depict that the correct answer of question No. 125 is (C), which has wrongly been changed to (B) due to which the merits of petitioners in this competitive examination, have adversely suffered. In respect of answers to other questions as a whole, counsel for petitioners have also relied upon few text books of another authors and material, but from the side of petitioners, no allegations of any arbitrariness, biasness or malafides have been levelled against the Board or against the Subject Experts to whom Board sent the objections to give final opinion. It is evident that the final answer key published by the Board on 01.07.2024 was finalized as per the report of opinion of the Subject Experts. A copy of report by the Subject Experts has been shown by the Advocate General to the [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (39 of 46) [CW-16144/2024] Court during course of arguments, which goes to show that Subject Experts relied upon the authentic material. The relevant sources of materials relied upon by the Subject Experts are as under:- (i) https://www.diffen.com/difference/Dynamic_random- access_memory_vs_Static_random-access_memory (ii) Semiconductor Devises Physics and Technology S.M. SZE and M.K. LEE JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC ISBN 978-0470-53794-7 Link: Page 172 First Paragraph Line 4 “The mataloxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) is composed of an MOS capacitor and two p-n junctions placed immediately adjacent to the MOS capacitor” (iii) Modern Semiconductor Devises for Integrated Circuits Chenming Calvin Hu Prentice Hall 2010 ISBN: 9780136085256, 0136085252 Link: Page 158 Figure 5.2 “An MOS transistor is an MOS capacitor with PN junctions at two ends: (iv) Semiconductor Physics and Devises Donald A. Neamen McGraw-Hill, Fourth Edition, 2011 ISBN 978-0-07- 352958-5 Link: Page 371, Fourth Last Line “The MOS capacitor is the heart of the MOSFET” (v) Semiconductor device fundamentals. Pierret, R.F. Addison-Wesley, Second Edition, 1996 Link: Page 621, Chapter 17, Section 17.1 “Physically, the MOSFET is essential nothing more than an MOS-Capacitor with two pn junctions placed immediately adjacent to the regions of the semiconductor controlled by the MOS-gate. (vi) MOS Capacitor and MOS Transistors: The MOS transistors (used in SRAM) contain MOS Capacitor as part them. Specifically, the MOS Capacitor is a fundamental part which formed between the gate (metal), oxide (insulating layer), and semiconductor (channel) of the transistor, and plays an essential role in controlling the flow of current. [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (40 of 46) [CW-16144/2024] Before finalizing the answers of five questions under consideration in this batch of writ petitions, the Subject Experts have applied their mind and have taken into consideration the authentic material and text books, to change the answer of question No. 125 and to keep the answers of other questions No. 12, 50, 89 and 127 unchanged, from the answers suggested in the preliminary answer key.

19. In the opinion of this Court, no clear cut case to show the answers of five questions referred hereinabove as apparently wrong, has been made out by the petitioners. This Court is not an Expert nor can act like an Expert to substitute the opinion of the Subject Experts and there is a jurisdictional constrain under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to examine the correctness of the answers by analyzing the material, relied upon by the counsel for petitioners in respect of five questions, which are under consideration in this batch of writ petitions. The material which has been taken into consideration by the Subject Experts, to finalize the answers of five questions under consideration, has not been stated to be unauthentic or unreliable. No prima facie case, to constitute a fresh Committee of Experts to revisit answers of five questions, is make out by petitioners.

20. It is neither the case of petitioners that the written examination was not conducted in fair and transparent manner nor it is the case that the process of recruitment suffers from any leaks of paper or other kinds of infirmities. The basis of filing these writ petitions is only that petitioners are not happy and do not have consensus with the final answers, indicated in the final answer key in respect of five questions under consideration. [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (41 of 46) [CW-16144/2024] Merely, for the reason that few of the aspirants do not have consensus with the final answer key in respect of few questions, the opinion and report of Subject Experts extended on the basis of thorough research and subjective material concerned, may not be assumed to be incorrect or doubtful. The scope of judicial review, in this respect cannot be allowed to be expanded, merely on the prayer of few of the aspirants because they rely on some other material, more so, when stack of thousands of aspirants is involved in respect of a public employment competitive examination and the material taken into consideration by the Subject Experts, is not proved to be unauthentic/unreliable.

21. The grey area of interference, to re-evaluate or scrutinize the answer sheet of the public examination, as has been culled out by the Supreme Court in case of Kanpur University Vs. Samit Gupta [(1983) 4 SCC 309], which has been followed in case of West Bengal Central School Service Commission and Ors. Vs. Abdul Halim [(2019) 18 SCC 39] and by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in case of Surjan Lal Dhawan (supra) as also by the Division Bench, is not available before this Court as it is difficult to discern and hold that the final answers of five questions, as finalized by the Subject Experts and shown in the final answer key dated 01.07.2024, are apparently incorrect/ wrong nor the correctness/ incorrectness of answers of such questions can be finalized on their face value, as per the material placed on record by the petitioners. The applicability of the principle of applying the process of reasoning is also impermissible. For ready reference, the relevant portion of Para No. 16 of the judgment reads as under:- [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (42 of 46) [CW-16144/2024] “16……..the key answer should be assumed to be correct unless it is proved to be wrong and that it should not be held to be wrong by an inferential process of reasoning or by a process of rationalization. It must be clearly demonstrated to be wrong, that is to say, it must be such as no reasonable body of men well- versed in the particular subject would regard as correct. In other words, the onus is on the candidate to clearly demonstrate that the key answer is incorrect and that too without any inferential process or reasoning. The burden on the candidate is therefore, rather heavy and the constitutional courts must be extremely cautious in entertaining a plea challenging the correctness of key answer………………...”

22. In the celebrated judgment of the Apex Court in case of Ran Vijay Singh And Ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. [(2018) 2 SCC 357], a two Judge Bench of the Supreme Court referred to large number of earlier decisions and culled out the broad principles applicable in such situations, following observations may be noted:-

30. The law on the subject is therefore, quite clear and we only propose to highlight a few significant conclusions. They are: 30.1. If a statute, Rule or Regulation governing an examination permits the re-evaluation of an answer sheet or scrutiny of an answer sheet as a matter of right, then the authority conducting the examination may permit it; 30.2. If a statute, Rule or Regulation governing an examination does not permit re-evaluation or scrutiny of an answer sheet (as distinct from prohibiting it) then the Court may permit re- evaluation or scrutiny only if it is demonstrated very clearly, without any “inferential process of reasoning or by a process of rationalisation” and only in rare or exceptional cases that a material error has been committed; 30.3. The Court should not at all re-evaluate or scrutinize the answer sheets of a candidate – it has no expertise in the matter and academic matters are best left to academics; 30.4. The Court should presume the correctness of the key answers and proceed on that assumption; and [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (43 of 46) [CW-16144/2024]

30.5. In the event of a doubt, the benefit should go to the examination authority rather than to the candidate. 31. On our part we may add that sympathy or compassion does not play any role in the matter of directing or not directing re-evaluation of an answer sheet. If an error is committed by the examination authority, the complete body of candidates suffers. The entire examination process does not deserve to be derailed only because some candidates are disappointed or dissatisfied or perceive some injustice having been caused to them by an erroneous question or an erroneous answer. All candidates suffer equally, though some might suffer more but that cannot be helped since mathematical precision is not always possible. This Court has shown one way out of an impasse – exclude the suspect or offending question. 32. It is rather unfortunate that despite several decisions of this Court, some of which have been discussed above, there is interference by the Courts in the result of examinations. This places the examination authorities in an unenviable position where they are under scrutiny and not the candidates. Additionally, a massive and sometimes prolonged examination exercise concludes with an air of uncertainty. While there is no doubt that candidates put in a tremendous effort in preparing for an examination, it must not be forgotten that even the examination authorities put in equally great efforts to successfully conduct an examination. The enormity of the task might reveal some lapse at a later stage, but the Court must consider the internal checks and balances put in place by the examination authorities before interfering with the efforts put in by the candidates who have successfully participated in the examination and the examination authorities. The present appeals are a classic example of the consequence of such interference where there is no finality to the result of the examinations even after a lapse of eight years. Apart from the examination authorities even the candidates are left wondering about the certainty or otherwise of the result of the examination – whether they have passed or not; whether their result will be approved or disapproved by the Court; whether they will get admission in a college or University or not; and whether they will get recruited or not. This unsatisfactory situation does not work to anybody’s advantage and such a state of [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (44 of 46) [CW-16144/2024] uncertainty results in confusion being worse confounded. The overall and larger impact of all this is that public interest suffers.

23. In the case of Vikesh Kumar Gupta and Ors. Vs. State Of Rajasthan and Ors., [(2021) 2 SCC 309], the Supreme Court after referring to decision in case of Ran Vijay Singh (supra) had observed as under:- “16. In view of the above law laid down by this Court, it was not open to the Division Bench to have examined the correctness of the questions and the answer key to come to a conclusion different from that of the Expert Committee in its judgment dated12.03.2019. Reliance was placed by the Appellants on Richal & Ors. v. Rajasthan Public Service Commission. In the said judgment, this Court interfered with the selection process only after obtaining the opinion of an expert committee but did not enter into the correctness of the questions and answers by itself. Therefore, the said judgment is not relevant for adjudication of the dispute in this case.

17. A perusal of the above judgments would make it clear that courts should be very slow in interfering with expert opinion in academic matters. In any event, assessment of the questions by the courts itself to arrive at correct answers is not permissible. The delay in finalization of appointments to public posts is mainly caused due to pendency of cases challenging selections pending in courts for a long period of time. The cascading effect of delay in appointments is the continuance of those appointed on temporary basis and their claims for regularization. The other consequence resulting from delayed appointments to public posts is the serious damage caused to administration due to lack of sufficient personnel.”

24. In the opinion of this Court, it is no more res integra that the scope of interference by the High Court in exercise of powers of judicial review, relating to the dispute pertaining to correctness of answers of questions of a public examination, is extremely narrow, if not completely shut out. The object behind that is to render [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (45 of 46) [CW-16144/2024] finality to the process of public employment and even an element of tolerance of minor error or calibrations is acceptable.

25. The same principle of law has been expounded by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in exercise of Surjan Lal Dhawan (supra), which has been affirmed by the Division Bench.

26. As far as case of Ram Dhan Kumawat (supra) relied upon by the counsel for petitioners is concerned, the Court after evaluation of the facts of that case, arrived at a conclusion that the model answer key, prepared by the Expert Committee, is not in consonance with the standard text books and material, published by the Education Board. In the present case, this Court does not find so. Thus, the ratio decidendi as expounded by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in exercise of Ram Dhan Kumawat (supra) does not render any support to the case of petitioners in this batch of writ petitions.

27. As far as the case of Vanshika Yadav (supra) is concerned, in facts of that case, a leak of NEET UGC – 2024 paper was an undisputed fact, further the investigation report by CBI indicated that several students got benefit by playing fraud, hence, the sanctity of examination itself was found to be vitiated. In that backdrop of factual matrix, which are not present in this batch of writ petitions, the Hon’ble Supreme Court constituted an Expert Committee. Due to distinguishable facts, the ratio decidendi expounded by the Supreme Court in case of Vanshika Yadav (supra) also does not render any help/support to the case of petitioner.

28. The upshot of discussion is that the prayer made in the writ petitions and the prayer made by counsel for petitioners are [2025:RJ-JP:24571] (46 of 46) [CW-16144/2024] devoid of any substance, hence, not liable to be accepted. All writ petitions are hereby dismissed.

29. Interim stay order(s), staying the appointment of the selected candidates, is hereby vacated.

30. Stay applications and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. NITIN/131-177 (Except 175& 176) (SUDESH BANSAL),J