Rajasthan v. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary

Judgment

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12157/2024

Ved Prakash Chaturvedi S/o Shri Hansraj Chaturvedi, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village And Post Dangarwara, Tehsil Andhi, District Jaipur, Rajasthan Versus ----Petitioner

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Education Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

2. Director Secondary Education, Rajasthan Bikaner. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12219/2024 Gajanand Yadav S/o Chanda Ram, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Keshava Ki Dhani, Village Chimanpura Anatpura, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. [2025:RJ-JP:35361] (2 of 5) [CW-13138/2024] Versus ----Petitioner

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12876/2024

1. Sunil Kumar Nagwal S/o Durga Prasad, Aged About 45 Years, R/o 36, Gramin Police Line, Borkheda, Kota, Rajasthan.

2. Sumedha W/o Rakesh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ward No. 12, Gandhi Bari, Hanumangarh Rajasthan.

3. Arun Singh Rathore S/o Magan Singh Rathore, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Parmanand Colony, Didwana, Nagaur, Rajasthan.

4. Krishan Kumar S/o Rajender Kumar, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Dholera, Mahendragarh, Haryana. ----Petitioners Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13108/2024

1. Rakesh Kumar Mochee Son Of Shri Tara Chand Mochee, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of 212, Targo Ka Mohalla, Ward No. 8, Mahajan, Bikaner (Raj.)

2. Raju Ram Meghwal Son Of Shri Sant Kumar, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of 152, Ward No. 02, Meghwalon Ka Mohalla, Chak, Phooldedar, Rajhan, Bikaner (Raj.)

3. Lakhveer Kaur Wife Of Shri Khushdeep Singh, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of 19, Pbn-A Dingwala, Hanumangarh (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus [2025:RJ-JP:35361] (3 of 5) [CW-13138/2024]

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13201/2024 Sunita Wife Of Vinod Kumar, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Village Neshal Badi, District Churu, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioner

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Of Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

2. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner, Rajasthan ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13259/2024

1. Prahlad Gurjar S/o Chhotu Ram Gurjar, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Tyoda, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

2. Dan Singh Meena S/o Ramji Lal Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Shankarpur, Karauli, Rajasthan.

3. Babu Lal S/o Jagdish Raigar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ambedkar Colony, Kuchamancity, Nagaur, Rajasthan.

4. Hansraj Balai S/o Chatru Ram Balai, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Bassinaga, Kalwar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13502/2024

1. Vikram Singh S/o Shri Jailal Singh, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 07, Nunia Gothra Nooniya, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. [2025:RJ-JP:35361] (4 of 5) [CW-13138/2024]

2. Dipti Solanki W/o Shri Yogendra Singh Naruka, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Plot No. C-10, Vatika Infotech City, Opp. Urban Woods, Thikariya, Bhankrota, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Indu Vaishnav W/o Shri Sudhir Kumar Vaishnav, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of Plot No.2, Flat No. T-3, Krishna Sagar, Mansarovar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Of Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner, Rajasthan ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14714/2024 Sonika Yadav D/o Raj Singh Yadav, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Bilali, Tehsil Bansur, District Alwar, Rajasthan Gaurav Jain S/o Rajendra Jain, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Behind Water Works, Vardhman Nagar, Hindauncity, District Karauli, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naman Maheshwari with Mr. S.M. Sharma for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 03/09/2025

1. Learned counsels appearing for the parties are in complete agreement that the issues involved in the above writ [2025:RJ-JP:35361] (5 of 5) [CW-13138/2024] petitions are covered by order dated 20.10.2023 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur wherein following directions have been given:- "Consequently, the writ petitions filed by the petitioners are allowed. Clause (11) indicated in the orders of appointment restricting the relieving the petitioners, is quashed and set aside. The respondents are directed to relieve the petitioners from their present positions and permit them to join at the place(s) where they have been provided appointment by the said orders."

2. It has also been informed that the aforesaid judgment dated 20.10.2023 passed in the case of Vikram Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., has been challenged by the State Government, by way of filing number of D.B. Special Appeals (Writ) by D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.53/2024, State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Vikram Singh & Anr., and all such appeals have been dismissed vide order dated 05.03.2024.

3. In view of above consensus between learned counsels for the parties, the instant writ petitions are allowed in the light of above judgment dated 20.10.2023 passed in the case of Vikram Singh (supra) and Clause 4 indicated in the orders of appointment restricting to relieve the petitioners is hereby quashed and set aside.

4. The respondents are directed to relieve the petitioners from their present positions and permit them to join at the place(s), where they have been provided appointment by the orders in question.

5. Ordered accordingly. DIVYA /244-252 (ANAND SHARMA),J