✦ Rajasthan High Court

Karan Mehra v. Sohan Singh Rajput

S.B. CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No. 5605 of 2017SANDEEP TANEJA3 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

5605/2017) is dismissed as withdrawn

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 66. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. Record of the Tribunal be sent back forthwith. TN/116-117 (SANDEEP TANEJA),J

Judgment

Karan Mehra S/o Shri Daulat Mehra, Being Minor Through His Natural Guardian And Father Sh, R/o Karbala Chauraha, Mehra Basti, Amer Road, Jaipur

2. Sohan Singh Rajput S/o Shri Gokul Singh , R/o House No. 13, Rajeev Nagar, Kacchi Basti, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur Presently Working Through Sudershan Khunteta S/o Shri Shankar Lal Khunteta, R/o A-13, Agrasen Colony, Brahmpuri, Jaipur Driver Of Truck No. Rj-14-Ga-4023

3. Sudershan Khunteta S/o Shri Shankar Lal Khunteta, R/o A-13, Agrasen Colony, Brahmpuri, Jaipur Owner Of Truck No. Rj-14-Ga-4023 ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 5952/2017 Karan Mehra S/o Shri Daulat Mehra Minor Through His Natural Guardian And Father Shri Daul, R/o Karbla Crossing, Mehra Basti, Amer Road, Jaipur Raj. ----Appellant Versus

1.

Sohan Singh Rajput S/o Shri Gokul Singh , R/o House No. 13, Rajeev Nagar, Kachchi Basti, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur Raj. And At Present Through Shri Sudharshan Khunteta S/o Shri Shankar Lal Khunteta, B/c Mahajan, R/o A-13, [2026:RJ-JP:16678] (2 of 3) [CMA-5605/2017] Agarsen Colony, Brahmpuri, Jaipur Driver

2.

Sudharshan Khunteta S/o Shri Shankar Lal Khunteta, R/o A-13, Agarsen Colony, Brahmpuri, Jaipur Raj. Owner

3.

The I.C.I.C.I. Lombard General Insurance Company Limited, Regional Office, Bhagwati Bhawan, Near P.l. Motors, Government Hostel Crossing, M.I. Road, Jaipur Raj. Through Regional Manager ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Chanderdeep Singh Jodha (respondent in CMA NO.5952/2017) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sandeep Mathur with Mr. Kapil Sharma (Appellant in CMA No.5952/2017) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Judgment 20/04/2026

1. These appeals have been filed under section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and award dated

24.07.2017 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, No.1, Jaipur Metropolitan, in M.A.C. Case No.222/2018, whereby claim petition filed by the claimant was partly allowed.

2. At the outset, learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that during the pendency of this appeal, the claimant and Insurance Company have resolved their dispute amicably by way of a compromise and pray that in terms thereof, the appeal filed by the claimant (CMA No.5952/2017) be disposed of, and the appeal filed by the Insurance Company (CMA No.5605/2017) may be permitted to be withdrawn.

3. A copy of memo of compromise duly signed by learned counsel for the claimant and the Insurance Company, has been [2026:RJ-JP:16678] (3 of 3) [CMA-5605/2017] placed on record on 18.03.2026. On a specific query by this Court, learned counsel for the parties submit that they are duly authorized by their respective parties to execute the memo of compromise, which reads as under:- "The parties to this litigation i.e. appellant- Claimants and Respondent No.3- I.C.I.C.I. Lombard General Insurance Company Limited have entered into compromise on the following terms:- 1. An additional lump-sum amount of Rs.25,00,000/- (Twenty Five lakh only) (including interest) shall be paid to the claimant by insurance company by depositing the same before the tribunal concerns within 2 months from today I.e.from date of compromise order in full and final settlement of appeal with claimants. The said enhancement amount shall be disbursed to the claimants through saving bank account. 2. In case, the insurance company fails to deposit the said amount within 2 months from today i.e. from date of compromise order, claimants shall be entitled for interest at 6% PA from the date of compromise order, till payment is made. 3. in terms of this compromise. " The Appeal is agreed to be disposed of

Operative part

4.

In view of the above, the appeal filed by the claimant (CMA No.5952/2017) is disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties and the appeal filed by the Insurance Company (CMA No.5605/2017) is dismissed as withdrawn.

6.

All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. Record of the Tribunal be sent back forthwith. TN/116-117 (SANDEEP TANEJA),J

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: 5605/2017) is dismissed as withdrawn

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 173.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Rajasthan High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. S.B. CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No. 5605 of 2017). ← Search more judgments