Dausa (Raj.) ----Appellants/Defendants vs Tarachand S/o Ramdhan, R/o Village Ranauli, Tehsil Ramgarh

----Appellants/Defendants Versus Tarachand S/o Ramdhan, R/o Village Ranauli, Tehsil Ramgarh Pachwara, District Dausa. ----Respondent/Plaintiff For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ramniwas Meena, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Kishan Yogi, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 19/09/2025 1- vihykFkhZ&izfroknh Øe&1 o 2 dh vksj ls ;g nhokuh vihy varxZr /kkjk 100 lh-ih-lh- fo}ku vihyh; U;k;ky;] vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k] ykylksV] nkSlk }kjk vihy la[;k&38@2017 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 25-09-2024 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh] ftlds ek/;e ls izR;FkhZ&oknh dh vihy Lohdkj djrs gq, fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky;] vfrfjDr ofj"B flfoy U;k;k/kh'k Øe&2 ykylksV] nkSlk }kjk nhokuh okn la[;k&15@2023 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 24-11-2017 dks vikLr fd;k] ftlds ek/;e ls oknh dk okn ckcr~ LFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk [kkfjt fd;k x;kA [2025:RJ-JP:38674] (2 of 6) [CSA-342/2025] 2- fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ o izR;FkhZ dh cgl lquh] vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA 3- lqlaxr rF; ;g gS fd oknh dh vksj ls fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k okn izLrqr dj vfHkdfFkr fd;k fd oknxzLr Hkw[k.M [kljk uacj 203 xzke jkex<+] ipokjk rglhy&ykylksV] nkSlk dh d`f"k Hkwfe dk ,d Hkkx gS] tks oknh dk [kjhn'kqnk gksdj mlds LokfeRo dk gS] izfroknhx.k bl ij dCtk djuk pkgrs gSa] vr% LFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk tkjh dh tkosA izfroknhx.k us oknxzLr Hkw[k.M vius LokfeRo dk gksuk crkrs gq, bl ij nks nqdkusa Hkh fufeZr gksuk crk;k] tcfd oknhx.k us oknxzLr Hkw[k.M ij yEcs le; ls viuk fuokl gksuk vfHkdfFkr fd;kA 4- fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk oknh dk okn ckcr~ LFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk [kkfjt fd;k ijarq mldh vksj ls vihy izLrqr djus ij vihy Lohdkj djrs gq, izfroknhx.k dks LFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk }kjk ikcan fd;k x;k fd oknh ds dCts'kqnk Hkw[k.M esa gLr{ksi ugha djsA 5- bl izdj.k esa ;g fooknjfgr fLFkfr gS fd oknxzLr Hkw[k.M d`f"k Hkwfe dk ,d Hkkx gSA oknh us viuk vkokl rFkk izfroknh us bl ij viuh nqdku gksuk crkrs gq, viuk&viuk LokfeRo crk;k gSA okn LFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk dk gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa bl f}rh; vihy esa fuEu fof/k dk lkjoku iz'u mRiUu gksrk gS%& ^^d`f"k Hkwfe ds laca/k esa LFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk dk okn flfoy U;k;ky; esa iks"k.kh; gksuk ekudj ikfjr fu.kZ; rF;ksa o fof/k ds foijhr gS\** 6- U;kf;d fu.kZ; Lal Singh Jhala Vs. Panna Lal 2016(0) Supreme (Raj.) 905 ds ekeys esa jktLFkku Hkw&jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1956 ¼ftls vkxs ^^vf/kfu;e&1956^^ dgk tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 103] jktLFkku dk'rdkjh [2025:RJ-JP:38674] (3 of 6) [CSA-342/2025] vf/kfu;e&1955 dh /kkjk 5¼24½ rFkk vU; lqlaxr izko/kkuksa ij fopkj djus ds mijkUr fuEukuqlkj O;oLFkk izfrikfnr dh x;h gS& "A bare look at the above two definitions, which have been indicated in two provisions relating to the Acts which deals with the land and abadi land, clearly reveals that till such time that the 'land' is not converted into 'abadi land', the same continuous to be land i.e. agriculture land with consequences as provided under both the Acts. ...................it is well settled that pertaining to an unconverted agriculture land, the suit would lie before the Revenue Court only and the Civil Court's jurisdiction would be barred under the provisions of section 207 of the Tenancy Act." 7- bl U;k;ky; }kjk Rama Kant Khetan Vs. Sri Ram Het Gupta & Ors. 1985 RLR 281 ds ekeys esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd tc rd d`f"k Hkwfe dk Hkw&mi;ksx ifjorZu ugha gksrk gS rc rd mldh izd`fr d`f"k Hkwfe gh jgsxhA 8- blh izdkj bl U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; Premi Devi Vs. Deva Ram & Ors. 2009 (1) DNJ (Raj.) 410 esa Hkh leku izd`fr dk fookn mRiUu gqvk Fkk rFkk U;k;ky; }kjk iSjk la[;k&3] 7 rFkk 8 esa tks vfHker izdV fd;k x;k] og lqlaxr gS tks fuEukuqlkj gS& "3. According to learned counsel for the appellant though the land is recorded as agricultural but it is surrounded by the Abadi land has come within the Municipal area of Jodhpur and further more is that the land in question was never cultivated, therefore, the civil Court has jurisdiction to entertain the suit relating to the land in question.

7. In view of the above reasons, the aforesaid judgments have no application to the facts of the case. The law in Rajasthan is very clear and it excludes the agricultural land from the jurisdiction of the civil Court and there are law by which the agricultural land can be converted into Abadi land and mere fact that the agricultural land holder [2025:RJ-JP:38674] (4 of 6) [CSA-342/2025] himself put the land for non-agricultural purpose is not sufficient for conversion of land from agricultural land to Abadi land. In Rajasthan, as per law, no agricultural land holder (Khatedar Tenant) can convert the agricultural land to Abadi land without permission of State. The taxation law may have deeming clauses for taxing the transaction and valuing the property, but same cannot be accepted while determining the jurisdiction of the civil Court qua the jurisdiction of revenue Court.

8. Learned counsel for the appellant also submitted that the defendant never contended that the land was cultivated, therefore it is not agricultural land. The argument is of no consequence in view of the fact that the nature of land is not dependent upon the fact that whether it is cultivated or not. When it is admitted case that land was not converted to Abadi from agricultural land and it is recorded as agricultural land in the revenue record, there is no merit in this appeal." 9- blh izdkj blh U;k;ky; }kjk S. B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 3658/2018 Om Prakash Vs. Smt. Mishro & Ors. esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 14-08-2025 ds iSjk la[;k&19 esa fuEu O;oLFkk izfrikfnr dh xbZ gS%& ^^19- ;fn dksbZ [kkrsnkj viuh d`f"k Hkwfe dks vd`f"k iz;kstukFkZ mi;ksx djuk pkgrk gS rks vf/kfu;e&1956 dh /kkjk 90, ds rgr fofgr izfdz;k viuk;h tkdj rFkk uxj lq/kkj dj o izhfe;e vkfn vnk dj l{ke izkf/kdkjh@jkT; ljdkj ls Hkw&:ikUrj.k vkns'k izkIr fd;k tkuk vko';d gS rFkk ,sls vkns'kksa ds fcuk vd`f"k iz;kstukFkZ d`f"k Hkwfe dk mi;ksx fd;k tkrk gS rks /kkjk 91¼1½ Hkw&jktLo vf/kfu;e ds rgr mlds fo:) csn[kyh lfgr vU; fof/k&lEer dk;Zokgh dh tk ldrh gSA orZeku ekeys esa Hkh oknh dh vksj ls d`f"k Hkwfe dk :ikUrj.k@Hkw&mi;ksx ifjorZu ugha djk;k gS] mlds ckotwn mldk ;g vfHkdFku fd bl Hkwfe dks vd`f"k iz;kstukFkZ ekuk tkos] ;g fuosnu fof/kd izko/kkuksa ds mYya?ku esa gS rFkk [2025:RJ-JP:38674] (5 of 6) [CSA-342/2025] bls flfoy U;k;ky; vFkok laoS/kkfud U;k;ky; }kjk ekU;rk ;k Lohd`fr ugha nh tk ldrhA** 10- pwafd oknxzLr Hkwfe d`f"k Hkwfe gS rFkk mlds vkoklh; vFkok O;kolkf;d vFkok vd`f"k iz;kstukFkZ Hkw mi;ksx ifjorZu ugha gqvk gS rFkk okn ek= LFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk ds laca/k esa gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 207 ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj izdj.k dh lquokbZ dk vuU; {ks=kf/kdkj jktLo U;k;ky;ksa dks gS] flfoy U;k;ky; dk {ks=kf/kdkj ugha gS ysfdu blds ckotwn fo}ku fopkj.k o vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk vihyk/khu vkns'k ikfjr fd;s x;s gaSA 11- ;|fi i{kdkjksa }kjk flfoy U;k;ky; ds {ks=kf/kdkj ds laca/k esa fopkj.k vFkok vihyh; U;k;ky; esa dksbZ vkifRr ugha dh xbZ gS ijarq blds ckotwn Hkh i{kdkjksa dh lgefr ls vFkok vk{ksi ugha fd;s tkus ls flfoy U;k;ky; esa orZeku ekeys dk {ks=kf/kdkj fufgr ugha gksrk gS] bl laca/k esa U;kf;d fu.kZ; Jannat Firdosh And Anr. Vs. Alfu & Ors. 2008(1) WLN 374 (Raj.) dk iSjk la[;k&5 lqlaxr gS] tks fuEukuqlkj gS%& "5. From a bare reading of Section 207(1) of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act shows that there is bar about the jurisdiction of the civil Court and this is statutory bar. This jurisdiction cannot be conferred by the parties in the Court which has no jurisdiction. The nature of the land can be changed only by obtaining appropriate order from the competent authority for conversion of the land from one category to another and for that purpose also, in the State of Rajasthan, there are other sets of rules framed under the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act also prescribes the procedure of the revenue Courts also. Therefore, the judgment relied upon by the learned counsel for the appellant delivered in the case of Abdulla Bin Ali (supra) has no application to the facts of the case." [2025:RJ-JP:38674] (6 of 6) [CSA-342/2025] 12- mijksDr fof/kd O;oLFkk o rF;kRed fLFkfr dks ns[krs gq, ;g Li"V gS fd izdj.k dh lquokbZ dk {ks=kf/kdkj flfoy U;k;ky; dks ugha Fks] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa fopkj.k o vihyh; U;k;ky; dk vihyk/khu fu.kZ; flfoy U;k;ky; dk {ks=kf/kdkj oftZr gksus ek= ds vk/kkj ij vikLr fd;k tkrk gS rFkk i{kdkjksa dks ;fn os pkgsa] rks jktLo U;k;ky; esa mipkj izkIr djus dh Lora=rk iznku dh tkrh gSA i{kdkjksa dh vksj ls jktLo U;k;ky; esa ;fn okn izLrqr fd;k tkrk gS rks os vihyk/khu nksuksa fu.kZ;ksa esa ikfjr fu"d"kZ o vfHker ls izHkkfor gq, fcuk Lora= :i ls lHkh i{kksa dks lqudj fof/kuqlkj fu.kZ; ikfjr djsaxsA 13- blh vuqlkj vihykFkhZ&izfroknh Øe&1 o 2 dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g f}rh; vihy fof/kd fcanq ij Lohdkj dj fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gS rFkk LFkxu vkosnu o vU; vkosnu] ;fn dksbZ yafcr gksa] rks os mDrkuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd;s tkrs gSaA 14- dk;kZy; dks funsZ'k fn;k tkrk gS fd fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; dk vfHkys[k vfoyEc izsf"kr fd;k tkosA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J DINESH KUMAWAT /40