The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p v. Connected

Hemraj Rangera S/o Shri Sohan Lal Rangera, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Baliyo Ka Mohalla, Turkiyas, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Bharatpur). State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp Versus ----Petitioner ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sharma, Ms. Chanchal & Mr. Utkarsh Goyal for Mr. Rajneesh Gupta Mr. Kapil Gupta Mr. Kunal Sharma Mr. Jaswant Singh Rathore Mr. Sanjay Khedar Mr. Vikram Shishwal Mr. Shekhar Singh For Respondent(s) Mr. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Bhupendra Kumar Sharma [2025:RJ-JP:33012] (3 of 5) [CRLMB-8114/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 21/08/2025

1. This instant applications for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicants-accused Saurabh Sethi Son Of Rajesh Sethi, Suraj Meel S/o Rajendra Meel, Sunil Kumar S/o Naresh Kumar, Chirag Yadav S/o Rampal Singh, Dinesh Rajwaniya S/o Murlidhar Rajwaniya, Samir Suthar S/o Anil Suthar, Amit Babal S/o Dharmpal Babal, Hemraj Rangera S/o Shri Sohan Lal Rangera in FIR No. 165/2025 dated 13.05.2025 registered at P.S. Kotwali Bharatpur District - Bharatpur whereby the applicants-accused were charged under Sections 318(4), 316(2) of BNS and Section 66-D of IT Act.

2. The applicants were arrested and are in judicial custody since their arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application.

3. Learned counsel for the applicants relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicants are innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for applicants submits that the matter pertains to offence under Sections 318(4), 316(2) of BNS and Section 66-D of IT Act and now the parties have settled their dispute as complainant is compensated by additional payment of ₹12,00,000/- in addition to ₹10,00,000/- recovered during investigation by police. They submits that nothing survives in this matter as the offence under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of BNS are compoundable under the law. They also [2025:RJ-JP:33012] (4 of 5) [CRLMB-8114/2025] submitted that the police has already filed a charge-sheet and disposal of the case will take its own time.

4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. Learned counsel for complainant submits that he has received ₹22,00,000/- lost during transaction with accused and he has no objection in case bail is granted to these petitioners accused.

5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record.

6. Having considering the submissions and also considering the material placed on record, I am of the considered view that the parties have settled their dispute and the dispute pertains to private nature. A charge-sheet has been filed after investigation.

7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicants-accused are no more required in the investigation and they are in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicants-accused.

8. Thus, the instant bail applications filed on behalf of applicants-accused Saurabh Sethi Son Of Rajesh Sethi, Suraj Meel S/o Rajendra Meel, Sunil Kumar S/o Naresh Kumar, Chirag Yadav S/o Rampal Singh, Dinesh Rajwaniya S/o Murlidhar Rajwaniya, Samir Suthar S/o Anil Suthar, Amit Babal S/o Dharmpal [2025:RJ-JP:33012] (5 of 5) [CRLMB-8114/2025] Babal, Hemraj Rangera S/o Shri Sohan Lal Rangera , are hereby allowed and ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicants-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicants-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicants-accused shall be liable to be canceled.

9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. CHETNA BEHRANI /96-103 (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J