Judicature For Rajasthan High Court · 2012
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, this revision petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Limitation Act, 1963 s. 5
Judgment
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. KOTHARI Mr. Liyakat Ali, for petitioner Mr. Laxman Meena, P.P., for the State *** Learned Counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the present revision petition. Accordingly, this revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The application u/s.5 of the Limitation Act also stands dismissed. [S.S. KOTHARI], J. FRBOHRA/406CRLREVISION2012 11-5.doc Certificate: “All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.” FATEH RAJ BOHRA, P.A.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this revision petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Limitation Act, 1963 — s. 5.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Rajasthan High Court, on 11 May 2012. The bench was S S KOTHARI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.