Nanak Sankhala Son Of Shri Bhagat Singh, Aged About vs State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Joint Secretary

Judgment

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Joint Secretary Administration, Department Of Medical And Health (Group-2), Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)

2. Director (Non Gazzettee), Medical And Health Services,

5. Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Bharatpur (Raj.) Chief Medical And Health Officer, Deeg (Raj.) Medical Officer Incharge, Community Health Center Sikri Patti, District Deeg (Raj.)

6. Medical Officer Incharge, Primary Health Center Barkhera Faujdar, Nagar, District Deeg (Raj.) ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9504/2025

Chandan Singh Son Of Shri Pooran Singh, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Gopalgarh, Tehsil Pahari, District Deeg (Bharatpur)

2. Ram Lal Son Of Shri Hari Ram, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of Kishori Payhsa Mohalla, Kaman, Tehsil Kaman, District Deeg (Bharatpur)

3. Ankit Jain Son Of Shri Anoop Kumar Jain, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Udaka Mohalla, Jain Pathshalak Ke Pass, Kaman, Tehsil Kaman, District Deeg (Bharatpur)

4. Nanak Sankhala Son Of Shri Bhagat Singh, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Khatik Mohalla, Deeg, District Deeg (Bharatpur) [2025:RJ-JP:24849] (2 of 5) [CW-9505/2025] ----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Joint Secretary Administration, Department Of Medical And Health (Group-2), Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)

2. Director (Non Gazzettee), Medical And Health Services,

7. Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Bharatpur (Raj.) Chief Medical And Health Officer, Deeg (Raj.) Medical Officer Incharge, Community Health Center Gopalgarh, Division Pahari, Deeg (Raj.) Block Medical Officer, Kaman, District Deeg (Raj.) Medical Officer Incharge, Community Health Center Jurhera, Deeg (Raj.)

8. Medical Officer Incharge, Community Health Center Sinsini, Deeg (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 07/07/2025 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9505/2025:- Although, it is prayed in the writ petition that the orders impugned dated 07.05.2025 and 31.05.2025 dispensing with services of the petitioners, the pharmacists appointed on urgent temporary basis, be quashed and set aside; but, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they would feel contended if they are permitted to submit representation(s) with the respondents to consider their case in the light of an order of a coordinate Bench [2025:RJ-JP:24849] (3 of 5) [CW-9505/2025] of this Court dated 27.05.2025 passed in the case of Kaushik Kumar Pandya & Ors. versus State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil Writ Petition No.11074/2025. In the case of Kaushik Kumar Pandya & Ors. (supra), this Court observed as under:- “Be that as it may, the petitioners may file their representation(s) with the concerned Chief Medical and Health Officers for redressal of their grievances. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court deems it appropriate to direct respondents consider engagement/continuous of the petitioners on the post of Pharmacist, in case they feel that the services of the petitioners are required by them. The present writ petitions stand disposed of, accordingly. The stay applications also stand disposed of, accordingly.” Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and an order of a coordinate Bench of this Court dated 02.02.2024 passed in the case of Pawan Meena versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024, this writ petition is disposed of in following terms without issuing notices to the respondents:-

1. The petitioners are at liberty to submit representation(s) with the respondents for redressal of their grievance(s) within a period of four weeks from today. [2025:RJ-JP:24849] (4 of 5) [CW-9505/2025]

2. The respondents are directed to consider the representation(s) within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt in the light of observation made by a coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Kaushik Kumar Pandya & Ors. (supra). Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9504/2025:- Although, it is prayed in the writ petition that the orders impugned dated 03.06.2025, 16.05.2025, 24.05.2025 and

15.05.2025 dispensing with services of the petitioners, the pharmacists appointed on urgent temporary basis, be quashed and set aside; but, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they would feel contended if they are permitted to submit representation(s) with the respondents to consider their case in the light of an order of a coordinate Bench of this Court dated

27.05.2025 passed in the case of Kaushik Kumar Pandya & Ors. versus State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil Writ Petition No.11074/2025. In the case of Kaushik Kumar Pandya & Ors. (supra), this Court observed as under:- “Be that as it may, the petitioners may file their representation(s) with the concerned Chief Medical and Health Officers for redressal of their grievances. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court deems it appropriate to direct respondents consider engagement/continuous of the petitioners on the [2025:RJ-JP:24849] (5 of 5) [CW-9505/2025] post of Pharmacist, in case they feel that the services of the petitioners are required by them. The present writ petitions stand disposed of, accordingly. The stay applications also stand disposed of, accordingly.” Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and an order of a coordinate Bench of this Court dated 02.02.2024 passed in the case of Pawan Meena versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024, this writ petition is disposed of in following terms without issuing notices to the respondents:-

1. The petitioners are at liberty to submit representation(s) with the respondents for redressal of their grievance(s) within a period of four weeks from today.

2. The respondents are directed to consider the representation(s) within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt in the light of observation made by a coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Kaushik Kumar Pandya & Ors. (supra). Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. YOGESH/64-65 (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J