✦ High Court of India · 08 Sep 2025

Tonk Road, Jaipur v. Mother Mamta Devi

Case Details High Court of India · 08 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
08 Sep 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,782 words

1. Mamta Devi W/o Shri Sohan Lal Balai, Aged 26 Years,

2. Sanni S/o Shri Sohan Lal Balai, Aged 7 Years,

3. Rahul S/o Shri Sohan Lal Balai, Aged 5 Years,

4. Ankit S/o Shri Sohan Lal Balai, Aged 3 Years, Respondents No. 2 to 4 Are Minors Through Guardian And Mother Mamta Devi

5. Lal Chand Urf Lala Ram S/o Late Bhonri Lal,

6. Dakha Devi W/o Lal Chand, All R/o Dhani Balaiyon Ki, Village- Khijuria Brahman, Teh. Bassi, Distt. Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Respondents/Claimants

7. Prem Kumar S/o Shri Shiv Kishor, Aged 27 Years, R/o Village Pateli, Teh. And Distt. Hardoi, Uttar Pradesh (Driver Mini Truck No. RJ-14-GF 0574)

8. M/s Balaji Traders Through Pro. Shri Govind Singh S/o Shri Moti Lal, S-A-7B, Vivek Vihar, Saras Dairy Road, Near Gandhi Nagar Railway Station, Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur (Registered Owner Mini Truck No. RJ-14-GF 0574) ----Respondents/Non- Claimants For Appellant(s) : Mr. Bhanu Prakash, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Om Prakash Gupta, Adv. Mr. Dheeraj Jain, Adv. [2025:RJ-JP:36003] (3 of 8) [CMA-3550/2015] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI 08/09/2025 Order vihykFkhZx.k@nkosnkjku dh vksj ls S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3550/2015 rFkk chek daiuh dh vksj ls S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2811/2015 fo}ku U;k;ky; eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k] la[;k&2] t;iqj egkuxj] t;iqj }kjk ,d gh Dyse ;kfpdk la[;k 756@2013 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o vokMZ fnukad 23-05-2015 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh x;h gS] ftlds ek/;e ls fo}ku vf/kdj.k us vihykFkhZx.k dks dqy 12]72]500@& :i;s izfrdj jkf'k rFkk mDr jkf'k ij ;kfpdk izLrqr djus dh fnukad 26-07-2013 ls olwyh rd 6 izfr'kr lk/kkj.k okf"kZd C;kt dh nj ls C;kt fnyok;k gSA pwafd mDr nksuksa vihysa ,d gh vkykSP; vkns'k ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh x;h gSa] ,slh fLFkfr esa mDr nksuksa vihyksa dk fuLrkj.k ,d gh vkns'k ds ek/;e ls fd;k tk jgk gSA vihykFkhZx.k@nkosnkjku ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dk cgl ds nkSjku ;g lhfer rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k us lM+d nq?kZVuk esa e`rd dh e`R;q gksus ij lkg;pZ] okR;Y; o ykM+&I;kj ds enksa esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk vfHkfu/kkZfjr fl)karksa ds vuqlkj izfrdj jkf'k ugha fnyok;h gS rFkk laink dh gkfu ds en esa dksbZ jkf'k ugha fnyok;h gS] vr% izfrdj jkf'k esa fof/k vuqlkj o`f) fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA izR;FkhZ&chek daiuh ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dk cgl ds nkSjku rdZ jgk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k us e`rd dh vk; nLrkosth ,oa ekSf[kd lk{; ls [2025:RJ-JP:36003] (4 of 8) [CMA-3550/2015] Li"V ugha gksus ds dkj.k rRle; izpfyr U;wure etnwjh nj ds fglkc ls 30 fnol dh etnwjh ds vk/kkj ij vk; gkfu dh x.kuk dh gS] tcfd 26 fnol dh etnwjh nj ds vk/kkj ij x.kuk dh tkuh pkfg, FkhA blds vfrfjDr fo}ku vf/kdj.k us Hkfo"; esa vk; o`f) ds en esa 50 izfr'kr dh nj ls ykHk fn;k x;k gS] tcfd fof/k vuqlkj 40 izfr'kr dh nj ls gh ykHk fn;k tk ldrk gSA vihykFkhZx.k dks vU; enksa esa mfpr izfrdj jkf'k fnyok;h tk pqdh gS] vr% vihykFkhZx.k dh vihy [kkfjt dh tkosA eSaus mHk; i{k ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA orZeku izdj.k esa fnukad 07-07-2013 dks lM+d nq?kZVuk esa lksgu yky dh eksVjlkbfdy ds feuh Vªd la[;k RJ 14 GF 0574 }kjk VDdj ekjus ds dkj.k mldh e`R;q gks x;h FkhA fo}ku vf/kdj.k us vihykFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ekSf[kd ,oa nLrkosth lk{; ds vk/kkj ij e`rd dh vk; fuf'pr rkSj ij fu/kkZfjr ugha gksus ij rRle; izpfyr U;wure etnwjh nj 166@& :i;s izfrfnu ds vk/kkj ij e`rd dh vk; gkfu dh x.kuk dh gSA chek daiuh ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dk viuh cgl ds nkSjku ;g rdZ jgk gS fd vk; gkfu dh x.kuk djrs le; 26 fnu dh etnwjh nj ds fglkc ls x.kuk dh tkuh pkfg,A bl laca/k esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d n`"VkUr Laxmidhar Nayak & Ors. Vs. Jugal Kishore Behera & Ors. 2018 (1) SCC 746 rFkk Laxmi Devi & Ors. Vs. Mohammad Tabbar & Anr. 2008 (12) SCC 165 esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj 30 fnu ds ikfjJfed njksa ds vuqlkj izfrdj dh x.kuk gksuk vko';d gSA ,sls [2025:RJ-JP:36003] (5 of 8) [CMA-3550/2015] esa 166@& :i;s izfrfnu ds vk/kkj ij e`rd dh ekfld vk; 4980@& :i;s izfrekg fu/kkZfjr dh tkrh gSA e`rd ij mldh iRuh] 3 iq= o ekrk&firk vkfJr Fks] ,slh fLFkfr esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk vo/kkfjr fofu'p; National Insurance Co. Vs Pranay Sethi & Ors., (2017) 16 SCC 680 ds vuqlkj mlds O;fDrxr [kpZ ds :i esa 1@4 Hkkx dh dVkSrh fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr gS] ,sls esa mDr dVkSrh fd;s tkus ds i'pkr e`rd dh ekfld vk; 3]735@& :i;s 'ks"k jgrh gSA fo}ku vf/kdj.k us nq?kZVuk ds le; e`rd dh vk;q 26 ls 30 o"kZ ds e/; fu/kkZfjr dh gS rFkk mDr vk;q ds vk/kkj ij 17 dk xq.kd iz;ksx esa fy;k gS] tks lgh iz;ksx esa fy;k gSA e`rd dh LFkk;h izd`fr dh ukSdjh gks vkSj og fu;fer osru izkIr djrk gks] bls vihykFkhZx.k dh vksj ls lkfcr ugha fd;k x;k gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa e`rd ds Lofu;ksftr gksus ds vk/kkj ij mls Hkfo"; esa vk; o`f) dk ykHk 40 izfr'kr dh nj ls fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gS] tcfd fo}ku vf/kdj.k us 50 izfr'kr dh nj ls ykHk nsdj fof/kd Hkwy o =qfV dh gSA rn~uqlkj vk; gkfu dh x.kuk dh tkos rks ;g jkf'k 3735x12x17=7,61,940@& :i;s laxf.kr gksrh gS rFkk blesa 40 izfr'kr Hkfo"; esa vk; o`f) dk ykHk 3]04]776@& :i;s tksM+s tkus ij ;g jkf'k 10]66]716@& :i;s gksrh gS] tcfd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk bl en esa 11]47]500@& :i;s fnyk;s gSaA vr% vk; gkfu ds en esa 80]784@& :i;s de fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSaA [2025:RJ-JP:36003] (6 of 8) [CMA-3550/2015] tgka rd ijEijkxr 'kh"kZd esa izfrdj jkf'k dk iz'u gS] National Insurance Co. Vs Pranay Sethi & Ors. (2017) 16 SCC 680 fofu'p; esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd%& "54. ........................ It seems to us that reasonable figures on conventional heads, namely, loss of estate, loss of consortium and funeral expenses should be Rs. 15,000/-, Rs. 40,000/- and Rs. 15,000/- respectively. The principle of revisiting the said heads is an acceptable principle. But the revisit should not be fact-centric or quantum-centric. We think that it would be condign that the amount that we have quantified should be enhanced on percentage basis in every three years and the enhancement should be at the rate of 10% in a span of three years. We are 41 disposed to hold so because that will bring in consistency in respect of those heads." bl izdkj mDr fofu'p; ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 31- 10-2017 dks ikfjr fd;k x;k gSA mlds i'pkr Sadhana Tomar & Ors. Vs. Ashok Kushwaha & Ors. Civil Appeal No. 3763/2025 fofu'p; esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 24-01-2025 dks iz.k; lsBh ¼iwoksZDr½ ds fu.kZ; ds vuq:i fu.kZ; ikfjr dj nq?kZVuk ds i'pkr dalksfVZ;e dh gkfu] lEink dh gkfu o vafre laLdkj ds enksa esa izR;sd rhu o"kZ i'pkr 10 izfr'kr dh o`f) dh x;h gSA blh izdkj dk er ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk Kavita Devi & Others Vs. Sunil Kumar & Another 2025 INSC 938 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; esa O;Dr fd;k gSA mDr fu.kZ; ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Nanu Ram @ Chuhru Ram & ors., 2018 (18) SCC 130 esa vfHkfu/kkZfjr fl)akrksa ds vuq:i fd;k x;k gS] ftlesa dalksfVZ;e] izse&Lusg dks foLr`r :i ls foosfpr djrs gq, eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e dks ykHknk;d o dY;k.kdkjh fof/k [2025:RJ-JP:36003] (7 of 8) [CMA-3550/2015] gksuk crkrs gq, mfpr izfrdj fu/kkZj.k ds laca/k esa er O;Dr fd;k x;k gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa bl izdj.k esa Hkh dalksfVZ;e dh gkfu] lEink dh gkfu o vafre laLdkj ds enksa esa iz.k; lsBh ¼iwoksZDr½ ds fu.kZ; fnukad 31-10-2017 ds vuq:i izR;sd rhu o"kZ esa 10 izfr'kr dh o`f) dk ykHk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA ,sls esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk mDr U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa esa vfHkfu/kkZfjr fl)kar ds vuqlkj dalksfVZ;e gkfu ds en esa izR;sd vihykFkhZ 48]400@& :i;s vFkkZr~ dqy 2]90]400@& :i;s rFkk vafre laLdkj ds en esa 18]150@& :i;s rFkk lEink dh gkfu ds en esa Hkh 18]150@& :i;s vFkkZr mDr enksa esa dqy 3]26]700@& :i;s izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSa] tcfd vf/kdj.k us mDr enksa esa dsoy 1]25]000@& :i;s gh fnyk;s x;s gSaA vr% mDr enksa esa dqy 2]01]700@& :i;s c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSaA bl izdkj fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk tks izfrdj jkf'k fnyk;h x;h gS] mlesa c<+ksrjh djrs gq, vihykFkhZ@nkosnkjku dqy 1]20]916@& :i;s vfrfjDr :i ls izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSaA mijksDr foospukuqlkj vihykFkhZ&chek daiuh New India Assurance Co. Ltd. dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy la[;k 2811/2015 vLohdkj dj [kkfjt dh tkrh gS rFkk vihykFkhZx.k@nkosnkjku Jherh eerk nsoh o vU; dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy la[;k 3550/2015 vkaf'kd :i ls Lohdkj dh tkdj fo}ku U;k;ky; eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k] la[;k&2] t;iqj egkuxj] t;iqj }kjk ,d gh Dyse ;kfpdk la[;k 756@2013 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o vokMZ fnukad 23-05-2015 dks mikUrfjr djrs gq, vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk tks izfrdj jkf'k vihykFkhZx.k dks [2025:RJ-JP:36003] (8 of 8) [CMA-3550/2015] fnyok;h x;h gS] mlds vfrfjDr vihykFkhZx.k 1]20]916@& :i;s izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gksaxs rFkk vihykFkhZx.k mDr c<+h gqbZ jkf'k ij ;kfpdk izLrqr djus dh fnukad ls olwyh dh fnukad rd 07 izfr'kr okf"kZd lk/kkj.k C;kt nj ls C;kt Hkh izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gksaxsA vihyk/khu vkns'k dh 'ks"k 'krsaZ ;Fkkor jgsaxhA fo}ku vf/kdj.k dk vfHkys[k ;fn bl U;k;ky; dks izkIr gks j[kk gS] rks bl vkns'k dh izfr ds lkFk ykSVk;k tkosA (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J MANISH SAINI /63-64

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments