Manish Mahla v. State Of Rajasthan, Through Inspector General Of Pris
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
This criminal writ petition is disposed of in following term(s)
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. District Collector And District Magistrate, Dausa (Raj.) Superintendent Special Central Jail, Salyawas, Dausa (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tekchand Swami For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR…
Judgment
Manish Mahla S/o Shri Ramdev Singh Mahla, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Ward No. 32, Infront Of Modi Collage, Laxmangarh, Police Station Laxmangarh, District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present Con- fined In Special Central Jail, Salyawas, Dausa (Raj.), Through His Brother - Piyush Mahla S/o Shri Ramdev Singh Mahla, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Ward No. 32, Infront Of Modi Collage, Lax- mangarh, Police Station Laxmangarh, District Sikar (Raj.), Versus ----Petitioner
State Of Rajasthan, Through Inspector General Of Pris- ons, Directorate Prisons, Ghatgate, Jaipur.
Operative part
District Collector And District Magistrate, Dausa (Raj.) Superintendent Special Central Jail, Salyawas, Dausa (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tekchand Swami For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Judgment / Order 22/05/2026 This criminal writ petition is filed for quashing the order dated 27.04.2026 passed by the District Collector & District Magistrate, Dausa whereby, the petitioner was denied emergent parole for his treatment. This criminal writ petition is disposed of in following term(s) as agreed and requested by learned counsels for the respective parties:- [2026:RJ-JP:21799-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLW-711/2026] The respondents shall ensure that the i) petitioner is subjected to laser surgery for treatment of pilonidal sinus at Sawai Man Singh Hospital, Jaipur within a period of three weeks from the date of communication of this order. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J GAUTAM/133
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.