✦ Rajasthan High Court · 09 Sep 2008

Judicature For Rajasthan High Court · 2008

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI Mr. Yogesh Gupta, for petitioner *** Petitioner, who is working as Sub-Inspector at the relevant time, was SHO, Police Station, Hindaun City, District Karauli. FIR No.616/03 u/ss.498A, 406 & 120B IPC was registered against few accused persons and despite their application u/s.438 Cr.P.C. being rejected by this court, allegation levelled against the petitioner was that he made no efforts and has shown their arrest on 9th June, 2004 and produced before the court on the same day where they were granted bail. Since he failed in making proper investigation and adopting appropriate procedure available under law, disciplinary authority served him a notice under R.17 of CCA Rules and after taking his explanation into consideration, found him guilty and punished with the penlaty of stoppage of one annual grade increment without cumulative effect vide order dt.21st December, 2004 – against which he preverred appeal that too was dismissed by the authority vide order dt.16th July, 2007. CW 9731/07 [2] Counsel submits that the act which has been referred to in the notice served upon is not a misconduct and placed reliance on the judment of apex court reported in 2007 (4) SCC-566. Petitioner was Investigating Officer in FIR No.616/03 and for a delinquency committed by him which has come on record certainly it was a misconduct for which he was charge sheeted. As regards judgment [supra] on which counsel for petitioner placed reliance is of no assistance in the facts of instant case. This court has gone through the order passed by the authority and does not find any infirmity which may call for interference. Consequently, writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. [AJAY RASTOGI], J. FRBOHRA9731CW07 9-9.doc

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 120B, 406, 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Rajasthan High Court, on 09 Sep 2008. The bench was AJAY RASTOGI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Rajasthan High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments