SB CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 18193/12 v. GOVERDHAN DAS RATHI – & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
appeal stand disposed of accordingly
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. The learned counsel Mr. Manish Sharma for the appellants and Mr. Alok Garg appearing for the respondents have submitted a joint application being No. 18193/12 signed by the respective parties, whereby the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement and the appellants-tenants have agreed…
- Para 22. In view of the above the appeal is permitted to be withdrawn as not pressed for in view of the settlement arrived at by the parties. The application and the appeal stand disposed of accordingly. (BELA M. TRIVEDI) J. MRG. All corrections made in…
Judgment
Cause title
SB
CIVIL
FIRST APPEAL NO.686/2009. AND SB CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 18193/12. MADAN LAL THROUGH LRS. – APPELLANTS
VS GOVERDHAN DAS RATHI & ANR. – RESPONDENTS
DATE OF
JUDGMENT :
29TH MAY, 2012. PRESENT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI Mr. Manish Sharma for the appellants. Mr. Alok Garg for the respondents. BY THE COURT :
The learned counsel Mr. Manish Sharma for the appellants and Mr. Alok Garg appearing for the respondents have submitted a joint application being No. 18193/12 signed by the respective parties, whereby the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement and the appellants-tenants have agreed to vacate the suit premises on 30th June, 2014, to which the respondent-landlord has no objection. The said application has been signed by all the respective parties and their respective advocates also. One of the appellant Kailash S/o Madan Gopal and the respondent Goverdhan Das are present SBCFA No. 686/09. SBCivil Misc. Appli. No.18193/12. Madan Golal & Ors. Vs. Goverdhan Das Rathi & Ors. 2 in the court and they have agreed to the terms of the settlement as mentioned in the application. The learned counsel Mr. Manish Sharma for the appellants also states that the appellants shall not transfer or submit or create any third party interest in the suit property and also pay the rent regularly till 30th June, 2014. In view of the said application, the learned counsel Mr. Manish Sharma for the appellants does not press the appeal and requested the court to dispose of the appeal accordingly.
Operative part
In view of the above the appeal is permitted to be withdrawn as not pressed for in view of the settlement arrived at by the parties. The application and the appeal stand disposed of accordingly. (BELA M. TRIVEDI) J. MRG. All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed. M.R. Gidwani PS-cum-JW
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: appeal stand disposed of accordingly
Which court decided this case, and when?
Rajasthan High Court, on 29 May 2012. The bench was BELA M TRIVEDI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.