✦ High Court of India · 29 Jul 2025

Darwaza Bahar, Jaipur. vs State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

Case Details High Court of India · 29 Jul 2025

Judgment

2. State Of Rajasthan Through Pp, Raj. Versus ----Petitioners ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3752/2021

Seema Rehman W/o Shri Zikrur Rehman, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Plot No. 10, Gali No. 4, Maulana Ziyauddin Colony, Char Darwaza Bahar, Jaipur. Versus ----Petitioner

2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. Mohammad Faim S/o Shri Mohammad Naim, ( Wrongly Mentioned In Fir As R/o 10, Gali No. 4, Ziyauddin Colony, Ramganj, Jaipur City ( North), Rajasthan, India ) Original R/o Plot No. 9, Suraj Nagar, Pashchim Path, Yamuna Path, Civil Lines, Ajmer. S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1830/2022 Smt. Annu Kumari W/o Ajay Parsal D/o Sukhram Choudhary, Aged About 32 Years, R/o B-152, Jamunaapuri, Muralipura, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents ----Petitioner State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. Versus [2025:RJ-JP:28512] (2 of 8) [CRLMP-6580/2024] S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2929/2022 Kirti Bhai S/o Shri Ramnik Lal Dave, R/o Chandroday Society, Opp. Goldan, Traygal, Sardar Padel Road, Navrangpura, Ahamdabad (Gujrat). ----Respondent

2. Versus ----Petitioner State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. Bharat Lal Meena S/o Manphool, R/o Khawa, Tehsil And District Sawaimadhopur. ----Respondents S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4138/2022 Sanjay Biyani @ Sanjay Maheshwari S/o Ram Swaroop Biyani, C-114 ( A And E) Road No. 8, Vishwakarma Industrial Area, Jaipur. Also At Guman Eternity, Gh-2, Subhash Nagar, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur. Kanak Biyani W/o Sanjay Maheshwari, R/o C-114 ( A And E) Road No. 8, Vishwakarma Industrial Area, Jaipur. Also At Guman Eternity, Gh-2, Subhash Nagar, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur. ----Petitioners State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. Versus Amit Kumar Meena S/o Hanuman Sahay Meena, R/o Hall Bank Manager Idbi Bank Branch Nims, Chandwaji, Jaipur Gramin, Rajasthan. ----Respondents S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6931/2022 Chainaram S/o Aasuram, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Nosal, Teh- Roopangarh District Ajmer (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner

2. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. Versus Ramdayal S/o Shri Shivraj, Resident Of Udaypura, Police Station Dudu Hall, Sail Sagar, P.s. Pachewar, Tonk (Rajasthan). ----Respondents S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 9972/2022 Ashish Somani S/o Shri Ramesh Kumar Somani, Partner Of M/s Shri Anand Enterprises, R/o 3860, Naiyon Ki Gali, Kgb Ka Rasta, Johari Bazar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. Versus [2025:RJ-JP:28512] (3 of 8) [CRLMP-6580/2024]

2. Shishram Sankhala S/o Shri Sagar Mal Sankhala, R/o Dhani Surdas Wali, Shyam Nagar, Kotputli, District Jaipur.

2. ----Respondents S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6431/2024 Phariyad Son Of Budda, Resdent Of Dholpur, Police Station Sadar Dholpur, District Dholpur (Raj). Altaph Son Of Jakar, Resident Of Katariya, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Raj). Hakku Son Of Aaseen, Resident Of Katariya, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Raj). Nanoo Son Of Aaseen, Resident Of Katariya, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Raj). Versus ----Petitioners State Of Rajasthan, Through The Public Prosecutor. Mohit Son Of Vijay, Resident Of Bhitarbar, Police Station Bhitarbar, District Gwalior ( M.p). ----Respondents S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6532/2024 Papu Sharma S/o Late Chitarmal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Kushalpura Bansa, Police Station Samod, District Jaipur.

2. Versus ----Petitioner State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. Rajkum Nitharwal S/o Babulal Nitharwal, R/o Pujari Ka Bass, Jajod, Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6593/2024 Indra Kumar Varindani Son Of Shri Kanhaiyalal Varindani, R/o 120, Girnar Colony, Scheme-6, Mandir Marg, Vaishali Marg, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) Himanshu Kumar Varindani S/o Shri Indra Kumar Varidani, R/o 120, Girnar Colony, Scheme-6, Mandir Marg, Vaishali Marg, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) Jay Kumar Varindani S/o Shri Indra Kumar Varidani, R/o 120, Girnar Colony, Scheme-6, Mandir Marg, Vaishali Marg, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) Versus ----Petitioners State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. Harish Sharma S/o Late Vishanu Datt Sharma, R/o B-01, Behind Kanwatia Hospital, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6621/2024 [2025:RJ-JP:28512] (4 of 8) [CRLMP-6580/2024]

2. Bimla W/o Sahiram, R/o Chawala, South West , Delhi. Rani W/o Hariniwas, R/o Chawala, South West , Delhi. Shakuntla W/o Jagram, R/o Chawala, South West , Delhi. Hoshiyari W/o Shivshankar, R/o Chawala, South West , Delhi. Shivshankar S/o Gangaram, R/o Chawala, South West , Delhi. Rahul Kumar S/o Randhir Singh, R/o Dhanwapur, Gurgaon Sadar, Haryana. Versus ----Petitioners State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. Deepak Gupta S/o Shri Radheshyam Gupta, R/o 782, Sector 17, Faridabad ( Hariyana). ----Respondents S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6739/2024 Bhairuram S/o Shri Ramdev, Aged About 76 Years, R/o Village Bhatawala, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur ( Rajasthan). Versus ----Petitioner

5. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. The Commissioner Of Police, Police Commissionerate, Govt. Hostel, M.i. Road, Jaipur. The Deputy Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur ( South). The Station House Officer, Police Station Sanganer Sadar, District Jaipur City ( South). S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6742/2024 Fatehchand Sharma S/o Late Shri Banshidhar Sharma, Aged About 82 Years, R/o House No. 2270, Khajane Walo Ka Rasta, Chandpole Bazar, Jaipur, ( Rajasthan). ----Respondents ----Petitioner

2. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. Versus Smt. Sharmila Devi W/o Rakesh Sansi, R/o B-371, Murlipura Scheme, Jaipur, Kardhani, Jaipur (West), Rajasthan. ----Respondents S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1595/2025

1. Sakil Ahmad Son Of Shri Munirkha, Residence Of Ward No. 20,uniara,tonk, Rajasthan.

2. Jahida Wife Of Shri Sakil Ahmad, Residence Of Ward No. [2025:RJ-JP:28512] (5 of 8) [CRLMP-6580/2024] 20,uniara,tonk, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioners

2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. Kyamudeen Son Of Shri Imamudeen, Residence Of Residence Of Ward No. 20,uniara, Tonk, Rajasthan. ----Respondents S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1985/2025 Sushil Mangal S/o Sh. Satyanarayan Mangal, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Bimal- Satya, 42, Royal Avenue, Pocket-27, Sector- 24, Rohini, Delhi- 110085,

5. Versus ----Petitioner State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. Chief Commissioner, Income Tax Department, Office Address:-Janpath, Jaipur (Raj.) Deputy Director, Enforcement Directorate, Zonal Office, 2nd Floor, Jeewan Nidhi IInd, LIC Building, Bhawani Singh Road, Jaipur (Raj.) Union of India through Secretary Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi, India. -----Respondent Varun Kumar Pandey S/o Vijay Bahadur Pandey, R/o Right Cross Road, A 24 Veshali Kommi 1, Sarjapur Road, Bengluru, India, Aged Adult. ----Respondents S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2247/2025 Anil Gupta S/o I.N. Gupta, Present Resident Of Flat No. 905, Tower-A, Ashadeep Green Avenue, Jagatpura, Jaipur. ----Petitioner

2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its P.p. Versus Anisha Anand D/o Sumindra Anand, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of 5-Ja-15, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur (Raj). ----Respondents S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2982/2025 Smt. Shyama Bansal W/o Shri Jai Kishan, Aged About 65 Years, Resident Of 2184, Dinanathji Ka Rasta, Chandpole Bazar, Nahargarh, Jaipur. Shri Jai Kishan S/o Shri Kalyan Mal Agrawal, Aged About 68 Years, Resident Of 2184, Dinanathji Ka Rasta, Chandpole Bazar, Nahargarh, Jaipur. [2025:RJ-JP:28512] (6 of 8) [CRLMP-6580/2024]

3. Versus ----Petitioners State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Pblic Prosecutor, Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur. Ashok Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Brijmohan Sharma, R/o 92, Krishna Nagar, Teen Dukaan, Dehar Ka Balaji, Murlipura, Jaipur (West), Rajasthan. ----Respondents S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3036/2025 Vinay Yadav S/o Singashan, Aged About 35 Years, House No. 365, Khasra No. 57/20, Extn-2C, Nangloi, West Delhi. Aadarsh Yadav S/o Singashan, House No. 365, Khasra No. 57/20, Extn-2C, Nangloi, West Delhi ----Petitioners State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. Versus Station House Officer, Police Station Malviya Nagar District Jaipur City (East) District Jaipur. Shri Vijay Gurunani S/o Shri Shankarlal, R/o 11/261, Malviya Nagar Jaipur City East Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. V.R. Bajwa, Sr. Adv. Assisted by Mr. Nitin Jain (Amicus curiae) Mr. Amit Jindial Mr. Prakash Lamba Mr. Chain Singh Rathore Mr. Santosh Kumar Soni Mr. Abhishek Bhardwaj Mr. Dharmendra for Mr. Kapil Gupta Mr. Pallav Choudhary Mr. Sparsh Bansal for Mr. Bharat Yadav Mr. Ankur Jain Mr. Aditya Matolia, Mr. Kushagra Sharma Mr. Sumit Kumar Jain Mr. Umesh Shringi with Mr. Sharad Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Sandeep Pathak Mr. Ram Ratan Gurjar Mr. Dharmendra Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sain Mr. Siddharth Bapna with [2025:RJ-JP:28512] (7 of 8) [CRLMP-6580/2024] Mr. Rahul Kumar Mr. Anil Kumar Yadav with Mr. Vikram Singh Mr. Sameer Dinesh Kiradiya with Mr. Mahatama Jain Mr. Saurabh Aswal Ms. Priyanka Mr. Devendra Singh Kaswa Mr. Akshay Bhardwaj with Mr. Ajay Singh for Mr. R.D. Rastogi for ED Mr. R.S. Bhardwaj HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 29/07/2025 In the instant batch of petitions, primary dispute is civil in nature, yet police authorities have intervened and in exercise of their jurisdiction wrongfully have registered the FIRs in question which is not tenable in law. In this regard, reliance is placed upon judgment passed in Rikhab Birani & Anr. Vs. State of UP & Anr.: SLP (Criminal) No. 8592/2024. Considering the facts and circumstances of the cases, on erstwhile occasion this Court appointed Mr. V. R. Bajwa, Senior Counsel as amicus curiae to assist the Court. Mr. V. R. Bajwa, Senior Counsel has submitted that the investigation should also note as to whether any preliminary enquiry was conducted prior to the registration of the complaints as per provisions of Section 223 of BNSS. On the previous date, matters were heard at length and State was directed to take appropriate action. In compliance of the directions passed by this Court, Director General of Police, has issued an instruction bearing No. 13874-958 dated 10.06.2025, issuing guidelines and directions for registration/non-registration of disputes which are prima facie civil in nature; the said [2025:RJ-JP:28512] (8 of 8) [CRLMP-6580/2024] instruction detailed guidelines as per the settled position of law. Subsequently, a Circular/instructions was issued on 14.07.2025, considering the rampant evasion of tax/revenue amount, by giving by go down Rajasthan Stamp Act, 1988, Indian Stamps Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961, Registration Act, 1908, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 and the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988. In the instant matters, this Court also observes that FIRs which are registered as per directions of the Court, should specifically follow the mandate as given under Section 175(3) read with Section 210 of BNSS in as much as appropriate enquiries, consideration of material documents, nonetheless, the orders should not be passed under Section 175(3) of BNSS in a mechanical manner without application of mind. In the facts and circumstances, after hearing the respective sides, this Court is inclined to dispose of the present petitions with a direction that if any interim order was granted, the same will continue till the investigation is concluded as per guidelines/instructions given by the above-referred Circulars. It is also expected and directed that the petitioners shall join investigation. In above terms, present petitions are disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /6-31 except 7,8,11,12,15,19,24

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments