✦ High Court of India · 24 Mar 2025

Amer District Jaipur, Rajasthan v. State Of Rajasthan, Through Government Secretary

Case Details High Court of India · 24 Mar 2025

Court

High Court of India

Decided

24 Mar 2025

Bench

Not available

Length

1,293 words

Judgment

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Government Secretary, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Rajasthan Government, Jaipur.

2. Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department , Near 22- Godam, Jaipur.

3. Joint Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Patel Marg, Mansarowar, Jaipur. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8554/2023

Smt Renu W/o Shri Rajesh Kumar, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Peer Baba Ke Pass Nosargali Pushkar Road, Ajmer, Presently Working As Chaukidar Government Girls Hostel Kotda, Ajmer. Versus ----Petitioner

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, 22 Godown Ke Pass, Jaipur.

3. Deputy Director, Social Justice And Empowerment [2025:RJ-JP:13185] (2 of 7) [CW-13667/2024] Department, Ajmer. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6099/2024

1. Heeramani W/o Shri Prem Prakash, Aged About 38 Years, R/o- Nausar Ghati, Peer Baba Ki Majar Near Gota Factory, Pushkar Road, Ajmer, Rajasthan - At Present Girls Hostel Kotda, Ajmer.

2. Geeta W/o Shri Bhanwar Singh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o- Nausar Ghati,near Peer Baba Ki Majar, Pushkar Road, Ajmer, Rajasthan - At Present Women Hostel Kotda, Ajmer.

3. Smt. Archana W/o Late Shri Jaysingh, R/o- Gaur Ji Ka Pura, Post Aanwla Teh Parwatsar, District Nagaur, At Present Working Chowkidar, Ews Hostel, Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Near 22-Godam, Jaipur

3. Deputy Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Ajmer, Rajasthan.

4. Marwad Gaurav Sainani Security Company Society Ltd., Ajmer Through President Shri Devkaran Sardiwal, Plot No. 25, Lane No.-18, Milatry Road, Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6605/2024 Kanchan Daughter Of Shri Heeralal, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of - Hanuman Gali Vatika Bheru Khejda, Kayad, Ajmer Presently Working As Chowkidar Devnarayan Adarsh Kanya Chhatrawas, Ghooghra, Ajmer. Versus ----Petitioner

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Government Of Rajasthan, [2025:RJ-JP:13185] (3 of 7) [CW-13667/2024] Jaipur.

2. Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, 22- Godam Ke Pas, Jaipur.

3. Deputy Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Ajmer, Rajasthan.

4. Marwad Gaurav Senani Security Company Society Ltd., Ajmer Through President Shri Devkaran Sardiwal, Plot No. 25, Lane No.- 18, Military Road, Ajmer, Rajasthan. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9375/2024 Shimla Kumari W/o Ramdayal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 49, Near Temple Roop Nagar, Bundi (Raj). ----Respondents Versus ----Petitioner

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Social Justice And Empowerment, Govt. Of Rajasthan Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. Director, Social Justice And Empowerment , Govt. Of Rajasthan Near 22 Godam Bridge, Jaipur.

3. Deputy Director, Social Justice And Empowerment, Govt. Of Rajasthan, District Bundi. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10097/2024 Ramesh Chand Bhambhi Son Of Shri Polu Ram, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of - Shivpuri, Ajmer Rajasthan- 305623, Presently Working On The Post- Cook, Government Hostel, Beawar, District Beawar, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioner

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, 22- Godam Ke Pas, Jaipur.

3. Deputy Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Beawar, District Beawar (Earlier District Ajmer). [2025:RJ-JP:13185] (4 of 7) [CW-13667/2024] ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13669/2024 Nathi W/o Shri Ratan Lal Sankhla, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Bank Ke Saamne Wali Gali, Lakshmipura, District Bundi Rajasthan, Presently Working As Cook At Ambedkar Hostel Lakshmipura, District Bundi, Rajasthan. Versus ----Petitioner

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Government Secretary, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Rajasthan Government, Jaipur.

2. Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Near 22-Godam, Jaipur.

3. Sub Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Bundi. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15958/2024 Mahaveer Bagadi S/o Shri Babulal Bagadi, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Nakadev Mohalla, Atru District Baran, (Presently Assistant Employee Residential School, Atru) Versus ----Petitioner

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, 22-Godown Ke Pass, Jaipur.

3. Deputy Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Baran.

4. Principal, Maharana Pratap Govt. Residential School, Atru District Baran, Rajasthan. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16150/2024 Bablu Son Of Shri Ramswaroop Harijan, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Chardana Tehsil Atru, District Baran, Rajasthan Presently Working As Safai Karmchari, Govt. Maharana Pratap Residential Senior Secondary School, Atru, District Baran. [2025:RJ-JP:13185] (5 of 7) [CW-13667/2024] Versus ----Petitioner

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, 22- Godam Ke Pas, Jaipur.

3. Principal, Government Maharana Pratap Residential Senior Secondary School, Atru, District Baran.

4. Project Director, Rajasthan Residential Educational Institutions Socity (Reeis), Social Welfare And Empowerment Department, Ambedkar Bhawan, Near Civil Lines Phatak, Jaipur. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16428/2024 Rajesh Kumar Son Of Shri Mangilal, Aged About 41 Years, Resident Of Katawar, Tehsil Atru, District Baran, Rajasthan Presently Working As Guard, Govt. Ambedkar Hostel, Katawar, District Baran. Versus ----Petitioner

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Near 22-Godam, Jaipur.

3. Deputy Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, District Baran, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Nidhi Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manish Bhardwaj for Mr. Nalin G. Narain JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order [2025:RJ-JP:13185] (6 of 7) [CW-13667/2024] 24/03/2025

1. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy involved in these petitions is covered by the judgment passed by this Court in case of Anokha Bai Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 372/2013. Counsel submits that these matters pertain to grant of minimum of the pay scale of Class IV employees looking to the long length of their service. Counsel submits that these petitions be disposed of in the light of the order passed by this Court in the case of Anokha Bai (Supra).

2. Per contra, counsel for the respondents opposes the arguments raised by counsel for the petitioners and submits that these petitions be disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioners to approach the State Authorities. Counsel submits that in case, the petitioners submit any representation in this regard, the same would be decided strictly in accordance with law.

3. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, these petitions are disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioners to file representation before the respondents. The respondents are expected to decide the same strictly in accordance with law, taking into account the directions issued by this Court in the case of Anokha Bai (Supra) to the extent of its applicability in the present matters. In the eventuality of its applicability, the respondents are directed to grant similar benefits to the petitioners as well.

4. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any order/direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioners in a particular way, the [2025:RJ-JP:13185] (7 of 7) [CW-13667/2024] respondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law.

5. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Ashu/385-396 (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J

Find similar cases Start drafting free

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments