Khuran Constructions, Ajmer v. Union of India & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Bench
- DALIP SINGH
Outcome
Withdrawn
application stand dismissed as withdrawn, as
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE DALIP SINGH Mr.D.D.Sharma, for the appellant. Mr.P.C.Sharma, for the respondents. ***** Learned counsel for the appellant submits that on account of the observations made by the learned court below while deciding the application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the case of the appellant has been prejudiced by the said observations made in the impugned order. He seeks liberty of this court to withdraw the application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to permit the appellant to withdraw the application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The said application is dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that the observations made by the learned court below shall not come in the way of either of the parties during the proceedings that may be initiated. Consequently, the appeal as well as the stay application stand dismissed as withdrawn, as aforesaid. (DALIP SINGH),J. Solanki DS, Jr.P.A.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: application stand dismissed as withdrawn, as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 9.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.